2 Sources
[1]
Customers prefer ChatGPT to company chatbots, Gartner finds
Companies poured money into customer-service chatbots. Their customers went and used ChatGPT instead, and a new Gartner survey finds people are three times more likely to reach for a third-party AI tool than the bot on a company's own site. Businesses spent big on AI to answer their customers. The customers had other ideas. People are approximately three times more likely to use a third-party GenAI tool, such as ChatGPT, than a company's own chatbot to sort out a service problem, according to Gartner, Inc. The firm, a research and advisory company, surveyed 3,566 customers in February and March. Use of outside GenAI tools during service interactions has nearly doubled in a year. Use of company chatbots has barely moved since 2022. Consumers, meanwhile, have embraced these tools, and half the US public now uses AI chatbots. Money in, little out The spending tells the other half of the story. A separate Gartner survey of 1,303 senior leaders found customer-service teams put a median 12 per cent of their 2025 budget into AI, more than any other business function. Only 24 per cent saw a positive financial return. "The disappointing impact of customer-facing GenAI investments has less to do with technology limitations and more to do with misalignment with customer expectations," said Eric Keller, a senior director analyst at Gartner. He argued firms should build AI-enabled service journeys across digital and voice, not standalone bots. Customers want action, not answers The behaviour has shifted in a second way. People no longer just want an AI to answer a question. They want it to do the task. Among GenAI users, 58 per cent said they had used it to act on their behalf. In business-to-business settings that rose to 74 per cent. Booking an appointment, submitting a document, updating an account: customers expect the bot to finish the job. Most company chatbots still stop at answers. That gap helps explain why people drift to tools that already act on their behalf. Why it matters Customer service has become an early test of whether enterprise AI pays. So far the money flows in faster than the returns, an adoption-versus-impact gap seen across industries. Meanwhile the AI labs circle the same work, and rivals keep buying up support-AI. Companies that treat GenAI as a bolt-on chatbot may keep losing their own customers to someone else's AI. One more thing: people still want a human on the line when the bot fails.
[2]
Gartner: Customers prefer ChatGPT over company chatbots
Customers are about 3 times more likely to use third-party generative AI tools than company-provided chatbots when trying to resolve customer service issues, according to a new Gartner survey. The survey, conducted in February and March 2026, included 3,566 B2B and B2C customers. Gartner said the findings point to 3 major changes in customer behavior: customers are choosing third-party generative AI tools over company chatbots, using AI to complete tasks rather than only find answers, and expecting access to a human agent when companies use AI in customer service. Eric Keller, senior director analyst in Gartner's Customer Service & Support Practice, said customers are adopting generative AI in both personal and work settings, but that trend has not led to higher use of customer service chatbots provided by companies. "Instead, GenAI is shifting some service interactions outside of company-owned channels," Keller said. Gartner said the use of third-party generative AI tools during service and support interactions has nearly doubled over the past year. Use of company-provided chatbots has remained statistically unchanged since 2022. The firm said this weak adoption may help explain why many customer service organizations have not yet seen financial returns from their AI investments. A separate Gartner survey of 1,303 senior leaders across multiple industries, conducted from January through April 2026, found that service and support leaders invested a median of 12 percent of their 2025 budgets in AI. Gartner said this was the highest share among the 10 business functions it assessed. Despite that spending, only 24 percent of service and support leaders showed positive financial returns across their AI use cases. Keller said the weak results from customer-facing generative AI investments are tied less to technology limits and more to a mismatch with customer expectations. "Rather than investing primarily in standalone chatbots, organizations should focus on AI-enabled service journeys that help customers resolve issues across digital and voice channels," Keller said. Gartner said customers also expect generative AI to help them take action, not just answer questions. Among customers who use generative AI, 58 percent said they had used it to complete a task on their behalf. In B2B settings, that figure rose to 74 percent. Keller said many company-provided chatbots are still mainly built to answer questions, while customers increasingly expect AI tools to help them complete actions such as booking appointments, submitting documents or updating accounts. "Service and support leaders should redesign digital support around conversational, action-oriented experiences, rather than treating GenAI as a standalone chatbot," Keller said.
Share
Copy Link
A Gartner survey of 3,566 customers reveals people are three times more likely to use third-party GenAI tools like ChatGPT than company chatbots for service issues. Despite customer service teams investing a median 12% of their 2025 budgets in AI—the highest among business functions—only 24% see positive financial returns, exposing a critical gap between AI spending and customer expectations.
Businesses have poured substantial resources into customer service AI, but a new Gartner survey reveals a troubling disconnect: customers are approximately three times more likely to use third-party GenAI tools such as ChatGPT than company chatbots when resolving service problems
1
2
. The research, conducted in February and March with 3,566 B2B and B2C customers, shows that use of outside GenAI tools during customer service interactions has nearly doubled over the past year, while adoption of company-provided chatbots has remained statistically unchanged since 20221
. This shift signals that AI for customer service is moving outside company-owned channels, creating an unexpected challenge for organizations that invested heavily in proprietary solutions.
Source: The Next Web
The spending picture tells an even starker story. A separate Gartner survey of 1,303 senior leaders across multiple industries found that service and support teams invested a median 12 per cent of their 2025 budgets in AI—the highest share among the 10 business functions assessed
2
. Despite this substantial commitment, only 24 per cent of service and support leaders reported positive financial returns across their AI use cases1
. This adoption-versus-impact gap exposes a fundamental misalignment between what companies are building and what customers actually need. Eric Keller, senior director analyst in Gartner's Customer Service & Support Practice, argues that "the disappointing impact of customer-facing GenAI investments has less to do with technology limitations and more to do with misalignment with customer expectations"1
.The research identifies a critical shift in how people want to interact with AI. Among GenAI users, 58 per cent said they had used it to complete a task on their behalf, with that figure rising to 74 per cent among B2B customers
2
. Booking appointments, submitting documents, updating accounts—customers now expect bots to finish the job, not simply provide information. Most company chatbots still stop at answers, creating a functionality gap that drives users toward more capable third-party tools. Keller emphasizes that "service and support leaders should redesign digital support around conversational, action-oriented experiences, rather than treating GenAI as a standalone chatbot"2
.Customer service has emerged as an early proving ground for whether enterprise AI delivers ROI. The data suggests that companies treating GenAI as a bolt-on feature risk losing their own customers to someone else's AI. Organizations should focus on building AI-enabled service journeys across digital and voice channels rather than investing primarily in standalone bots
1
. The findings also reveal another persistent expectation: customers still want access to human agents when AI fails to resolve their issues2
. As AI investments and customer expectations continue to diverge, businesses face pressure to rethink their approach or watch their service interactions migrate entirely to platforms they don't control.🟡 untrained_summary='### Companies Lose Customers to Third-Party GenAI ToolsBusinesses have poured substantial resources into customer service AI, but a new Gartner survey reveals a troubling disconnect: customers are approximately three times more likely to use third-party GenAI tools such as ChatGPT than company chatbots when resolving service problems
1
2
. The research, conducted in February and March with 3,566 B2B and B2C customers, shows that use of outside GenAI tools during customer service interactions has nearly doubled over the past year, while adoption of company-provided chatbots has remained statistically unchanged since 20221
. This shift signals that AI for customer service is moving outside company-owned channels, creating an unexpected challenge for organizations that invested heavily in proprietary solutions.
Source: The Next Web
The spending picture tells an even starker story. A separate Gartner survey of 1,303 senior leaders across multiple industries found that service and support teams invested a median 12 per cent of their 2025 budgets in AI—the highest share among the 10 business functions assessed
2
. Despite this substantial commitment, only 24 per cent of service and support leaders reported positive financial returns across their AI use cases1
. This adoption-versus-impact gap exposes a fundamental misalignment between what companies are building and what customers actually need. Eric Keller, senior director analyst in Gartner's Customer Service & Support Practice, argues that "the disappointing impact of customer-facing GenAI investments has less to do with technology limitations and more to do with misalignment with customer expectations"1
.Related Stories
The research identifies a critical shift in how people want to interact with AI. Among GenAI users, 58 per cent said they had used it to complete a task on their behalf, with that figure rising to 74 per cent among B2B customers
2
. Booking appointments, submitting documents, updating accounts—customers now expect bots to finish the job, not simply provide information. Most company chatbots still stop at answers, creating a functionality gap that drives users toward more capable third-party tools. Keller emphasizes that "service and support leaders should redesign digital support around conversational, action-oriented experiences, rather than treating GenAI as a standalone chatbot"2
.Customer service has emerged as an early proving ground for whether enterprise AI delivers ROI. The data suggests that companies treating GenAI as a bolt-on feature risk losing their own customers to someone else's AI. Organizations should focus on building AI-enabled service journeys across digital and voice channels rather than investing primarily in standalone bots
1
. The findings also reveal another persistent expectation: customers still want access to human agents when AI fails to resolve their issues2
. As AI investments and customer expectations continue to diverge, businesses face pressure to rethink their approach or watch their service interactions migrate entirely to platforms they don't control.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
