Customers prefer ChatGPT over company chatbots despite billions in AI spending, Gartner finds

2 Sources

Share

A Gartner survey of 3,566 customers reveals people are three times more likely to use third-party GenAI tools like ChatGPT than company chatbots for service issues. Despite customer service teams investing a median 12% of their 2025 budgets in AI—the highest among business functions—only 24% see positive financial returns, exposing a critical gap between AI spending and customer expectations.

Companies Lose Customers to Third-Party GenAI Tools

Businesses have poured substantial resources into customer service AI, but a new Gartner survey reveals a troubling disconnect: customers are approximately three times more likely to use third-party GenAI tools such as ChatGPT than company chatbots when resolving service problems

1

2

. The research, conducted in February and March with 3,566 B2B and B2C customers, shows that use of outside GenAI tools during customer service interactions has nearly doubled over the past year, while adoption of company-provided chatbots has remained statistically unchanged since 2022

1

. This shift signals that AI for customer service is moving outside company-owned channels, creating an unexpected challenge for organizations that invested heavily in proprietary solutions.

Source: The Next Web

Source: The Next Web

AI Investments Fail to Deliver Financial Return

The spending picture tells an even starker story. A separate Gartner survey of 1,303 senior leaders across multiple industries found that service and support teams invested a median 12 per cent of their 2025 budgets in AI—the highest share among the 10 business functions assessed

2

. Despite this substantial commitment, only 24 per cent of service and support leaders reported positive financial returns across their AI use cases

1

. This adoption-versus-impact gap exposes a fundamental misalignment between what companies are building and what customers actually need. Eric Keller, senior director analyst in Gartner's Customer Service & Support Practice, argues that "the disappointing impact of customer-facing GenAI investments has less to do with technology limitations and more to do with misalignment with customer expectations"

1

.

Customers Demand Task Completion, Not Just Answers

The research identifies a critical shift in how people want to interact with AI. Among GenAI users, 58 per cent said they had used it to complete a task on their behalf, with that figure rising to 74 per cent among B2B customers

2

. Booking appointments, submitting documents, updating accounts—customers now expect bots to finish the job, not simply provide information. Most company chatbots still stop at answers, creating a functionality gap that drives users toward more capable third-party tools. Keller emphasizes that "service and support leaders should redesign digital support around conversational, action-oriented experiences, rather than treating GenAI as a standalone chatbot"

2

.

What This Means for Enterprise AI Strategy

Customer service has emerged as an early proving ground for whether enterprise AI delivers ROI. The data suggests that companies treating GenAI as a bolt-on feature risk losing their own customers to someone else's AI. Organizations should focus on building AI-enabled service journeys across digital and voice channels rather than investing primarily in standalone bots

1

. The findings also reveal another persistent expectation: customers still want access to human agents when AI fails to resolve their issues

2

. As AI investments and customer expectations continue to diverge, businesses face pressure to rethink their approach or watch their service interactions migrate entirely to platforms they don't control.🟡 untrained_summary='### Companies Lose Customers to Third-Party GenAI Tools

Businesses have poured substantial resources into customer service AI, but a new Gartner survey reveals a troubling disconnect: customers are approximately three times more likely to use third-party GenAI tools such as ChatGPT than company chatbots when resolving service problems

1

2

. The research, conducted in February and March with 3,566 B2B and B2C customers, shows that use of outside GenAI tools during customer service interactions has nearly doubled over the past year, while adoption of company-provided chatbots has remained statistically unchanged since 2022

1

. This shift signals that AI for customer service is moving outside company-owned channels, creating an unexpected challenge for organizations that invested heavily in proprietary solutions.

Source: The Next Web

Source: The Next Web

AI Investments Fail to Deliver Financial Return

The spending picture tells an even starker story. A separate Gartner survey of 1,303 senior leaders across multiple industries found that service and support teams invested a median 12 per cent of their 2025 budgets in AI—the highest share among the 10 business functions assessed

2

. Despite this substantial commitment, only 24 per cent of service and support leaders reported positive financial returns across their AI use cases

1

. This adoption-versus-impact gap exposes a fundamental misalignment between what companies are building and what customers actually need. Eric Keller, senior director analyst in Gartner's Customer Service & Support Practice, argues that "the disappointing impact of customer-facing GenAI investments has less to do with technology limitations and more to do with misalignment with customer expectations"

1

.

Customers Demand Task Completion, Not Just Answers

The research identifies a critical shift in how people want to interact with AI. Among GenAI users, 58 per cent said they had used it to complete a task on their behalf, with that figure rising to 74 per cent among B2B customers

2

. Booking appointments, submitting documents, updating accounts—customers now expect bots to finish the job, not simply provide information. Most company chatbots still stop at answers, creating a functionality gap that drives users toward more capable third-party tools. Keller emphasizes that "service and support leaders should redesign digital support around conversational, action-oriented experiences, rather than treating GenAI as a standalone chatbot"

2

.

What This Means for Enterprise AI Strategy

Customer service has emerged as an early proving ground for whether enterprise AI delivers ROI. The data suggests that companies treating GenAI as a bolt-on feature risk losing their own customers to someone else's AI. Organizations should focus on building AI-enabled service journeys across digital and voice channels rather than investing primarily in standalone bots

1

. The findings also reveal another persistent expectation: customers still want access to human agents when AI fails to resolve their issues

2

. As AI investments and customer expectations continue to diverge, businesses face pressure to rethink their approach or watch their service interactions migrate entirely to platforms they don't control.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved