5 Sources
[1]
Why DeepSeek's 'major security and safety gaps' are causing concern
A new study looking into DeepSeek-R1's safety found that it could explain in detail the biochemical interactions of mustard gas with DNA. China-based company DeepSeek has turned the tide in the artificial intelligence (AI) wave, releasing a model that claims to be cheaper than OpenAI's chatbot and
[2]
More countries join to probe DeepSeek
Earlier this week Taiwan banned government departments from using DeepSeek's services. From half a dozen countries launching their own investigations into DeepSeek, to government departments scrambling to regulate the AI start-up's products on its workers' devices, the tech world has been left in
[3]
DeepSeek can create criminal plans and explain mustard gas, researchers say
There's been a frenzy in the world of AI surrounding the sudden rise of DeepSeek -- an open-source reasoning model out of China that's taken the AI fight to OpenAI. It's already been the center of controversy surrounding its censorship, it's caught the attention of both Microsoft and the U.S.
[4]
Chatbot vs national security? What's going on with DeepSeek bans
Chinese AI chatbot DeepSeek upended the global industry and wiped billions of US tech stocks when it unveiled its R1 program, which it claims was built on cheap, less sophisticated Nvidia semiconductors. But now governments from Washington to Seoul are scrambling to ban the user-friendly Chinese
[5]
Governments Ban DeepSeek AI Over Security and Privacy Concerns
Why Are Governments Banning DeepSeek AI? Security Risks and Data Privacy Concerns Explained Several governments are banning DeepSeek AI from official devices, citing serious security risks and data privacy concerns. The AI chatbot, developed by the Chinese startup DeepSeek, has quickly gained
Share
Copy Link
DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, is under investigation by multiple countries due to security vulnerabilities and data privacy issues, leading to bans on government devices and probes into its practices.

DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, has recently shaken the AI industry with its R1 reasoning model, claiming to offer performance comparable to OpenAI's GPT-4 and Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet at a fraction of the cost
1
2
. However, this rapid ascent has been accompanied by significant security and privacy concerns, prompting investigations and bans from multiple countries.A study by Enkrypt AI, a US-based AI security company, revealed alarming security gaps in DeepSeek-R1. The model was found to be 11 times more likely to generate harmful content compared to OpenAI's o1 model
1
. Specific concerns include:1
DeepSeek's privacy policy states that user data is transferred to servers in China, raising concerns due to China's National Intelligence Law, which requires companies to cooperate with state intelligence agencies
1
4
. This has led to probes by data protection authorities in Belgium, France, Ireland, and Italy1
2
.Several countries have taken action against DeepSeek:
2
4
2
4
5
Related Stories
DeepSeek's claim of achieving high performance using less advanced H800 chips has significant implications for the semiconductor industry
4
. This development challenges the narrative that cutting-edge chips are necessary for advanced AI models, potentially disrupting the global chip market4
.As investigations continue, DeepSeek faces challenges in addressing security concerns while maintaining its competitive edge. The company's alignment with Chinese regulations and potential censorship of sensitive topics add complexity to its global expansion
3
4
.The situation highlights the growing tension between rapid AI advancements and the need for robust security measures and data privacy protections. As governments and organizations grapple with these issues, the case of DeepSeek may set important precedents for the regulation and adoption of AI technologies developed by companies with ties to foreign governments
5
.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
[5]
17 Feb 2025•Policy and Regulation

08 Feb 2025•Policy and Regulation

31 Jan 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Science and Research

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology