2 Sources
[1]
DeepSeek AI Model Update: DeepSeek pushes out updated AI model it says is faster, leaner
DeepSeek released an update of its AI model this weekend that it says is faster and leaner, ramping up the Chinese company's challenge to Silicon Valley rivals Anthropic PBC and OpenAI as well as domestic competitors like Moonshot Kimi and Z.ai The firm unveiled the V4.1-Flash-1017 late Saturday
[2]
DeepSeek releases AI model update, opens search APIs to all users By Investing.com
Investing.com-- Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek on Saturday released an updated version of its AI model, touting improved benchmark performance, faster task completion, and shorter outputs as it seeks to enhance efficiency and broaden access to its tools. The company said
Share
Copy Link
Chinese AI startup DeepSeek unveiled its updated AI model V4.1-Flash-1017, claiming faster task completion and stronger benchmark performance across reasoning, coding, and visual tasks. The Hangzhou-based company also opened its Search and Fetch APIs to all users at $0.75 per 1,000 calls, intensifying competition with Silicon Valley rivals.
DeepSeek released its updated AI model V4.1-Flash-1017 late Saturday, marking another rapid advancement from the Chinese AI startup as it challenges both domestic competitors and Silicon Valley giants. The Hangzhou-based company announced the update through a series of posts on X, highlighting stronger benchmark performance, faster task completion, and shorter outputs compared to its previous version
1
. The model is now live across DeepSeek's web platform, mobile app, and developer API2
.The DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 demonstrates substantial improvements across reasoning, coding, agentic tasks, and visual benchmarks, according to the company's technical report published on Hugging Face
1
. On Humanity's Last Exam, which measures AI performance across thousands of questions in math, sciences, and humanities, the revised model scored between 36.8 and 42.6, improving upon the previous V4.1-Flash score of 36.8 to 39.11
. The model achieved 77.0 on the DeepSWE v1.1 benchmark, up from 74.2, and reached 60.5 on Automation-Bench V1.0.6, compared with 54.8 previously2
.DeepSeek described the update as a "Pareto improvement" in performance and cost, indicating gains in capabilities and efficiency without a corresponding increase in expense
2
. The model leverages reinforcement learning with self-feedback to improve end-to-end project development, including building games and creating 3D models from scratch2
. The system has been optimized for tools including DeepSeek Harness, Tencent CodeBuddy, and WorkBuddy2
. Enhanced capabilities now span uses ranging from game creation to 3D modeling, representing a minor but meaningful update to the earlier V4.1-Flash1
.Related Stories
Alongside the AI model update, DeepSeek opened its Search and Fetch APIs to all users, powered by the company's in-house search engine
2
. Each Search or Fetch API endpoint costs $0.75 per 1,000 calls, continuing the company's strategy of aggressively pricing its services2
. This pricing approach has previously impacted competitors, with the September release of the slimmed-down V4.1-Flash causing shares of rivals including MiniMax Group Inc., Z.ai, and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. to plummet on the Hong Kong stock exchange1
.The rapid pace of new launches from DeepSeek underscores the intensifying contest between China's open-weight models and the proprietary models of US counterparts like Anthropic PBC and OpenAI, which remain top performers but with far higher costs
1
. However, earlier this week, DeepSeek suffered an outage of about five hours, leaving its servers unreachable. Some experts attributed the glitch to a lack of sufficient computing resources1
. Service disruptions and slowdowns have increased in recent months as DeepSeek's aggressively priced AI models attract developers, putting pressure on its infrastructure1
. Watch how DeepSeek balances its rapid model releases with infrastructure scaling, and whether its pricing strategy forces established players to adjust their own cost structures in the coming months.Summarized by
Navi
1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Technology
