Devil Wears Prada 2 hired a human artist whose work looked so artificial it fooled viewers

2 Sources

Share

A meme in Devil Wears Prada 2 showing Meryl Streep's Miranda Priestly as a fast-food worker looked like AI slop to audiences. But digital artist Alexis Franklin revealed she hand-painted it, commissioned by director David Frankel. The revelation went viral, highlighting how sophisticated AI has made people skeptical of real human-made art.

Human Artist Alexis Franklin Creates Devil Wears Prada 2 Meme Mistaken for AI Art

When Devil Wears Prada 2 hit theaters on May 1, a brief meme sequence sparked an unexpected conversation about the blurring lines between human creativity and AI-generated content. The film, which dominated the box office as the highly anticipated sequel to the 2006 classic, shows editor-in-chief Miranda Priestly, played by Meryl Streep, facing a PR crisis complete with disparaging internet memes

1

. One particular image depicting Priestly as a fast-food worker with the caption "Would you like some lies with that?" looked so convincingly like AI slop that most viewers assumed it was intentionally AI-generated as part of the film's satirization of modern media.

Source: NBC

Source: NBC

But digital artist Alexis Franklin took to social media to set the record straight, revealing she hand-painted the Devil Wears Prada 2 meme at the request of director David Frankel

2

. "Absolutely no disrespect to Queen Meryl, but this is something I would've painted in my free time, so when they asked me to do this it was nothing but fun," Franklin wrote in an Instagram post that included a time lapse of her artistic process

1

. The revelation sparked hundreds of comments praising the film's decision to hire a human artist for the project, with one commenter noting it was "so refreshing it not being AI."

The Intentional Aesthetic That Fooled Audiences

Franklin told NBC News the digital painting took her a few days of on-and-off work to complete, and she was "fairly compensated" for her efforts. She explained she was aiming for a "cheap, plastic look that reminded me of the photoshopped 2010's meme aesthetic"

1

. That plastic appearance, combined with stylistic choices like blurred menu text, led many to believe the work was AI-generated. Illegible text has become a telltale sign of AI-generated imagery as models struggle to replicate small details, making Franklin's artistic choices unintentionally mirror common AI failures.

"Technically I was trying to make it look artificial, but emulating AI was not on my mind when I painted it," Franklin clarified. "It feels like the power of suggestion has taken hold in that regard"

1

. Some commenters even pointed to regular human micro-errors in the piece, claiming she intentionally created them to nail the AI slop aesthetic, which Franklin found amusing.

When Hypervigilance Hurts the Creative Industry

Despite sharing a time lapse and her extensive public portfolio from long before AI images became commonplace online, Franklin, a professional illustrator for nearly a decade, still received accusations of faking her work. This skepticism reflects a growing phenomenon troubling the creative industry: as generative AI technology becomes increasingly sophisticated, people are more likely to believe AI-generated images are real while simultaneously doubting that real images are human-made art

1

.

"This mass hypervigilance prevails because people don't want to be fooled, leading them to see signs on the walls that aren't really there or that have very simple, reasonable explanations," Franklin wrote. "And it's hard to know what the solution is"

1

. While she understands the skepticism, especially when it comes from people wanting to support human artists, she noted it also has the potential to hurt those very artists. "AI is so prevalent now, it feels like people have forgotten how it got that good -- it studied us," Franklin wrote. "The techniques it uses are ours!"

The viral discussion about human artists sparked by Franklin's revelation highlights a critical challenge facing the creative industry. As AI art becomes ubiquitous, audiences may struggle to recognize and appreciate human-made art, particularly when artists intentionally adopt aesthetics that mimic lower-quality or artificial-looking content. The incident suggests that going viral on social media for the wrong reasons—being mistaken for AI—may become an increasingly common experience for artists whose work doesn't conform to traditional standards of polish and perfection.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo
Youtube logo
© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved