2 Sources
[1]
A 'Devil Wears Prada 2' meme that viewers thought was AI slop was actually made by a human
What some viewers thought was an AI-generated meme in "The Devil Wears Prada 2" was actually drawn by a human artist. The highly anticipated sequel to the 2006 classic dominated the box office this weekend as its original cast returned to the story of the fictional magazine "Runway" 20 years later. One clip from the new film shows a slew of internet memes disparaging editor-in-chief Miranda Priestley, played by Meryl Streep, including one of Priestley as a fast-food worker, with the text: "Would you like some lies with that?" The meme, which was on screen for only a brief moment, looked to many audience members as an intentional depiction of AI slop, part of the film's satirization of the modern state of media. But when the artist who drew it, Alexis Franklin, shared online that the image was hand-painted, many viewers expressed their surprise and excitement that the meme, despite its appearance, wasn't AI-generated at all. "Absolutely no disrespect to Queen Meryl, but this is something I would've painted in my free time, so when they asked me to do this it was nothing but fun," Franklin wrote in an Instagram post. She said that "The Devil Wears Prada" director David Frankel asked to commission her for the piece. Franklin's post, which included a time lapse of her artistic process, accrued hundreds of comments praising her work as well as the film's decision to hire a human artist for the project. One commenter wrote that it was "so refreshing it not being AI." "Ai replacing artists 🙅🏻♀️ artists replacing ai 🙂↕️," wrote another. Franklin told NBC News that the digital painting took her a few days of on-and-off work to complete, and that she was "fairly compensated." She wrote in an email that she was going for a "cheap, plastic look that reminded me of the photoshopped 2010's meme aesthetic." But that plastic look has also spurred some commenters to ask if she intended to mimic the look of AI, particularly with certain stylistic choices like the blurring of menu text. (Illegible text has been a telltale sign of AI-generated imagery as models struggle to replicate small details.) "Technically I was trying to make it look artificial, but emulating AI was not on my mind when I painted it," Franklin wrote. "It feels like the power of suggestion has taken hold in that regard. I've had people point out regular, human micro-errors in the piece and claim I did it intentionally to nail the 'AI slop' of it all, which is amusing." Still, Franklin, a professional illustrator for nearly a decade, said some people are still having trouble believing that the work is her own. She's received accusations of faking her Priestley painting despite the time lapse she shared and her public portfolio of work from long before AI images became commonplace online. It's part of a growing phenomenon that has troubled media experts. As generative AI technology gets increasingly sophisticated, people are not only more likely to believe AI-generated images are real, but they're also more likely to believe real images are AI. "This mass hypervigilance prevails because people don't want to be fooled, leading them to see signs on the walls that aren't really there or that have very simple, reasonable explanations," Franklin wrote. "And it's hard to know what the solution is." She added that she understands people's skepticism, especially when it comes from a place of wanting to support human artists. But she said it also has the potential to hurt those artists. "AI is so prevalent now, it feels like people have forgotten how it got that good -- it studied us," Franklin wrote. "The techniques it uses are ours!"
[2]
The 'Devil Wears Prada 2' hired an artist whose work looked like AI. How she did it is going viral
Forget AI replacing human artists -- The Devil Wears Prada 2 just proved that human artists can replace AI. The new movie, a long-awaited sequel to 2006's The Devil Wears Prada, sees the return of star Meryl Streep as iconic fashion editor Miranda Priestly. It begins with Priestly in a PR crisis, sparking a slew of online hate. That includes memes like an image of Priestly dressed as a fast-food worker captioned, "Would you like lies with that?" The image is only briefly on screen, and at first glance, many moviegoers assumed it was AI-generated. After all, on the internet of 2026, it most likely would be -- an internet troll likely isn't going out of their way to craft the image by hand. But after The Devil Wears Prada 2 hit theaters on May 1, digital artist Alexis Franklin took to social media to set the record straight: She's the one who created the artwork, not AI, at the request of director David Frankel.
Share
Copy Link
A meme in Devil Wears Prada 2 showing Meryl Streep's Miranda Priestly as a fast-food worker looked like AI slop to audiences. But digital artist Alexis Franklin revealed she hand-painted it, commissioned by director David Frankel. The revelation went viral, highlighting how sophisticated AI has made people skeptical of real human-made art.
When Devil Wears Prada 2 hit theaters on May 1, a brief meme sequence sparked an unexpected conversation about the blurring lines between human creativity and AI-generated content. The film, which dominated the box office as the highly anticipated sequel to the 2006 classic, shows editor-in-chief Miranda Priestly, played by Meryl Streep, facing a PR crisis complete with disparaging internet memes
1
. One particular image depicting Priestly as a fast-food worker with the caption "Would you like some lies with that?" looked so convincingly like AI slop that most viewers assumed it was intentionally AI-generated as part of the film's satirization of modern media.
Source: NBC
But digital artist Alexis Franklin took to social media to set the record straight, revealing she hand-painted the Devil Wears Prada 2 meme at the request of director David Frankel
2
. "Absolutely no disrespect to Queen Meryl, but this is something I would've painted in my free time, so when they asked me to do this it was nothing but fun," Franklin wrote in an Instagram post that included a time lapse of her artistic process1
. The revelation sparked hundreds of comments praising the film's decision to hire a human artist for the project, with one commenter noting it was "so refreshing it not being AI."Franklin told NBC News the digital painting took her a few days of on-and-off work to complete, and she was "fairly compensated" for her efforts. She explained she was aiming for a "cheap, plastic look that reminded me of the photoshopped 2010's meme aesthetic"
1
. That plastic appearance, combined with stylistic choices like blurred menu text, led many to believe the work was AI-generated. Illegible text has become a telltale sign of AI-generated imagery as models struggle to replicate small details, making Franklin's artistic choices unintentionally mirror common AI failures."Technically I was trying to make it look artificial, but emulating AI was not on my mind when I painted it," Franklin clarified. "It feels like the power of suggestion has taken hold in that regard"
1
. Some commenters even pointed to regular human micro-errors in the piece, claiming she intentionally created them to nail the AI slop aesthetic, which Franklin found amusing.Related Stories
Despite sharing a time lapse and her extensive public portfolio from long before AI images became commonplace online, Franklin, a professional illustrator for nearly a decade, still received accusations of faking her work. This skepticism reflects a growing phenomenon troubling the creative industry: as generative AI technology becomes increasingly sophisticated, people are more likely to believe AI-generated images are real while simultaneously doubting that real images are human-made art
1
."This mass hypervigilance prevails because people don't want to be fooled, leading them to see signs on the walls that aren't really there or that have very simple, reasonable explanations," Franklin wrote. "And it's hard to know what the solution is"
1
. While she understands the skepticism, especially when it comes from people wanting to support human artists, she noted it also has the potential to hurt those very artists. "AI is so prevalent now, it feels like people have forgotten how it got that good -- it studied us," Franklin wrote. "The techniques it uses are ours!"The viral discussion about human artists sparked by Franklin's revelation highlights a critical challenge facing the creative industry. As AI art becomes ubiquitous, audiences may struggle to recognize and appreciate human-made art, particularly when artists intentionally adopt aesthetics that mimic lower-quality or artificial-looking content. The incident suggests that going viral on social media for the wrong reasons—being mistaken for AI—may become an increasingly common experience for artists whose work doesn't conform to traditional standards of polish and perfection.
Summarized by
Navi
21 Aug 2025•Technology

05 Feb 2025•Entertainment and Society

17 Mar 2026•Technology

1
Entertainment and Society

2
Health

3
Technology
