11 Sources
[1]
US drops bid to make Google sell AI investments in antitrust case
March 7 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday dropped a proposal to force Alphabet's Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab to sell its investments in artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI competitor Anthropic, to boost competition in online search. The DOJ still seeks a
[2]
US drops bid to make Google sell AI investments in antitrust case
March 7 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday dropped a proposal to force Alphabet's Google to sell its investments in artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI competitor Anthropic, to boost competition in online search. The DOJ and a coalition of 38 state attorneys
[3]
Google Can Keep Anthropic AI Investment Under Antitrust Proposal
Alphabet Inc.'s Google can keep its existing investments in artificial intelligence startups like Anthropic, but would be required to notify antitrust enforcers before investing in any more AI companies under a revised Justice Department proposal filed Friday in the agency's landmark antitrust case
[4]
Feds drop bid to make Google sell AI investments -- but still seek...
The Justice Department on Friday dropped a proposal to force Alphabet's Google to sell its investments in artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI competitor Anthropic, to boost competition in online search. The DOJ and a coalition of 38 state attorneys general still seek a court order
[5]
US drops antitrust case against Google over AI, not Chrome
The U.S. Department of Justice dropped a proposal Friday to force Alphabet's Google to sell its investments in artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI competitor Anthropic, to boost competition in online search. The DOJ and a coalition of 38 state attorneys general still seek a court
[6]
US drops bid to make Google sell AI investments in antitrust case
The DOJ still seeks a court order requiring Google to sell off its Chrome browser and take other measures aimed at addressing what a judge said was Google's illegal search monopoly, according to court papers filed in Washington.The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday dropped a proposal to force
[7]
DOJ Lets Google Keep AI Investments, but Not Chrome
(Credit: Mateusz Slodkowski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Google will be allowed to keep its existing AI investments but may still be forced to divest its dominant Chrome browser, following a final judgment by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The search giant has been a huge investor
[8]
New DOJ proposal still calls for Google to divest Chrome, but allows for AI investments
The US Department of Justice is still calling for Google to sell its web browser Chrome, according to a Friday court filing. The DOJ first proposed that Google should sell Chrome last year, under then-President Joe Biden, but it seems to be sticking with that plan under the second Trump
[9]
The DOJ reaffirms its stance on Google selling off Chrome
Chrome Canary just killed uBlock Origin and other Manifest V2 extensions Summary The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has reiterated that it wants Google to divest Chrome to promote competition in internet search. Google may also be required to sell Android if its proposed remedies are ineffective.
[10]
DOJ: Google Can Keep AI Investments but Must Sell Chrome | PYMNTS.com
That's according to a report Friday (March 7) by Reuters, which said the government is still seeking a court order that would compel the tech giant to sell its Chrome browser, following a judge's ruling that Google held an illegal search monopoly. "The American dream is about higher values than
[11]
US Drops Bid to Make Google Sell Anthropic Investments in Antitrust Case
Banning Google from AI investments could cause unintended consequence The US Department of Justice on Friday dropped a proposal to force Alphabet's Google to sell its investments in artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI competitor Anthropic, to boost competition in online
Share
Copy Link
The DOJ has withdrawn its proposal to make Google sell its AI investments but continues to pursue other antitrust measures, including the sale of Chrome browser, to address Google's search monopoly.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has made a significant shift in its antitrust case against Alphabet's Google. On Friday, the DOJ dropped its proposal to force Google to sell its investments in artificial intelligence companies, including Anthropic, a competitor to OpenAI
1
. This decision marks a notable change in the government's approach to regulating tech giants in the evolving AI landscape.Despite this concession, the DOJ, along with a coalition of 38 state attorneys general, is still seeking a court order that would require Google to sell its Chrome browser and implement other measures to address what a judge has deemed an illegal search monopoly
2
. These efforts are part of a broader crackdown on Big Tech companies that began during the Trump administration and has continued under President Biden.The DOJ's decision to allow Google to retain its AI investments came after prosecutors gathered additional evidence from Google's competitors and AI companies. This investigation revealed that banning Google from AI investments "could cause unintended consequences in the evolving AI space," according to the final proposal
3
. Instead, the DOJ now proposes that Google be required to give prior notice to the government about future investments in generative AI.Google, which plans to appeal the judge's ruling on its search monopoly, has put forward its own proposal. This includes loosening agreements with Apple and other companies that set Google as the default search engine on new devices
4
. The company argues that the DOJ's approach could hinder its ability to compete in AI and "jeopardize America's global economic and technological leadership."Related Stories
This case is part of a larger trend of antitrust scrutiny facing major tech companies. Apple, Meta Platforms, and Amazon also face allegations of maintaining illegal monopolies in their respective markets
5
. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for how the government approaches regulation of the rapidly evolving AI sector and the broader tech industry.U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has scheduled a trial on the proposals for April. The revised DOJ proposal includes some modifications, such as allowing Google to charge a marginal fee for sharing search query data with competitors, provided these competitors do not pose a national security risk. As the case progresses, it will likely continue to shape the landscape of tech regulation and competition in the AI space.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
09 Oct 2024•Policy and Regulation

30 May 2025•Policy and Regulation

22 Nov 2024•Policy and Regulation

1
Science and Research

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology