EU Parliament pushes for stricter AI copyright protections amid industry divide

2 Sources

Share

The EU Parliament adopted recommendations for new EU rules to protect copyrighted work from AI training, proposing a European register listing all copyrighted materials used by AI models. The non-binding report calls for fair compensation for creators and transparency requirements, but tech lobby groups warn it could harm Europe's digital competitiveness.

EU Parliament Demands Stronger Protections for Copyright Against AI

The EU Parliament voted Tuesday to adopt a series of recommendations calling for a "permanent" solution to protect copyright from artificial intelligence systems, marking a significant shift in how the bloc approaches generative AI and creative rights

1

. The non-binding report, drafted by Parliament's committee on legal affairs, urges lawmakers to ensure EU copyright law applies to all AI systems made available to users within the bloc

2

.

Source: Euronews

Source: Euronews

At the heart of the proposal lies a call for creating a European register at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) that would list every copyrighted work used in training AI models, as well as artists who have opted out of having their work used

1

. The report also suggests companies disclose which websites they have scraped for training data, establishing clear transparency requirements that could reshape how AI developers operate in Europe.

Fair Compensation for Creators Takes Center Stage

MEP Axel Voss, who pushed the report, emphasized the need for clarity. "We need clear rules for the use of copyright-protected content for AI training. Legal certainty would let AI developers know which content can be used and how licences can be obtained," he stated

2

. Parliamentarians stressed that copyrighted material must be "fairly remunerated" to protect the bloc's creative sector, which generates almost seven percent of the EU's gross domestic product

1

.

Source: ET

Source: ET

The report warns that failing to comply with these transparency requirements "could be tantamount to infringement of copyright," potentially exposing AI companies to legal consequences

1

. Under current EU rules, companies can use copyrighted materials for text and data mining, including AI training, unless a creator has "reserved their rights," according to Marc du Moulin, secretary-general of the European Composer and Songwriter Alliance (ECSA)

1

.

Industry Split: Creator Alliances Welcome Move, Tech Lobby Groups Push Back

The adoption of the report has drawn sharply divided reactions from different sectors. The European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (GESAC) praised the Parliament's "firm position" in favor of creators' rights. "This vote adds to the growing recognition at EU level of what is at stake. Innovation, fairness and cultural sovereignty must go hand in hand," said Adriana Moscoso del Prado, GESAC's general manager

1

. The European Composer and Songwriter Alliance urged the European Commission to "duly take into account" the Parliament's recommendations

2

.

However, tech lobby groups voiced strong concerns about the compliance burden. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) argued that requiring prior authorization from artists before their work can be used to train AI could amount to "a compliance tax" for European companies across multiple sectors

1

. Many firms would struggle to negotiate complex licensing agreements with major publishers, the association warned. "Today's non-binding report sends the wrong signal to innovators and risks holding back Europe's digital competitiveness on the global stage," said Boniface de Champris, AI policy lead at CCIA

1

.

What Comes Next for AI and Copyright in Europe

The demand for new EU rules comes ahead of a review of the EU's copyright rules scheduled for this summer

2

. While the EU has wide-ranging rules on AI through the EU AI Act adopted in 2024, which force systems to comply with current copyright law, Parliament research found it was not clear how they should apply to general purpose AI systems that have a vast range of functions

2

.

Some industry voices argue for enforcement over new legislation. Ann Becker, chair of Creativity Works!, a coalition representing creative industries, suggested that existing legislation including the EU AI Act and the Copyright Directive should be enforced to address the unauthorized use of artistic works by AI companies. "The priority should now be on fully implementing and enforcing existing rules rather than legislative changes that could weaken current protections and jeopardise investment in culture and creativity," she said

1

. Creative groups have previously noted that current rules do not provide a clear way for artists to opt out of having their work used for AI training, highlighting a gap that the Parliament's recommendations aim to address

1

. The coming months will reveal whether the European Commission translates these recommendations into binding legislation that balances rightsholders' interests with the need to maintain Europe's position in the global AI race.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo