18 Sources
[1]
Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa call on the UK to pass AI copyright transparency law
Wes Davis is a weekend editor who covers the latest in tech and entertainment. He has written news, reviews, and more as a tech journalist since 2020. Last week, Paul McCartney, Dua Lipa, Ian McKellen, Elton John, and hundreds of others in the UK creative industry signed an open letter backing an
[2]
Creatives demand AI comes clean on what it's scraping
Musicians, artists, writers, and actors urge government to protect copyright More than 400 of the UK's leading media and arts professionals have written to the prime minister to back an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, which promises to offer the nation's creative industries
[3]
Elton John and Dua Lipa urge Starmer to back UK artists in AI copyright row
Sir Paul McCartney, Richard Curtis and Dua Lipa are among the 400 top musicians, artists and media executives who have written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer seeking support to protect copyright from being ripped off by artificial intelligence tools. The letter calls on Starmer to next week
[4]
Opt out or get scraped: UK's AI copyright shakeup has Elton John, Dua Lipa fighting back
Sir Elton John (right) performs at the Verizon Center in Washington, D.C. Celebrity musicians from Elton John to Dua Lipa are urging the U.K. government to rethink controversial plans to reform copyright laws that allow artificial intelligence developers access to rights-protected content. An
[5]
The UK's House of Lords kicks back bill that let AI train on copyrighted content
It proposes an amendment to force companies to be transparent about their training. The UK's House of Lords just voted to add an amendment to a data bill that mandates that tech companies disclose which copyright-protected works were used to train AI models, . The amendment faced government
[6]
UK Parliament opts not to hold AI companies accountable over copyright material
Ministers in the UK House of Commons have blocked an amendment to a data bill that would require AI companies to disclose their use of copyrighted materials, . This transparency amendment was stripped out of the text by invoking something called financial privilege, an arcane parliamentary
[7]
Elton John and Dua Lipa seek protection from AI
Julia Willemyns, co-founder of the Centre for British Progress think tank, said such proposals could hamper the UK and its bid for growth. The measures would "do nothing to stop foreign firms from using content from the British creative industries," she told the BBC. "A restrictive copyright
[8]
UK ministers to block amendment requiring AI firms to declare use of copyrighted content
Government plans to use arcane procedure to strip amendment passed by House of Lords from its data bill Ministers are turning to an arcane parliamentary procedure to block an amendment to the data bill that would require artificial intelligence companies to disclose their use of
[9]
Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa among artists urging Starmer to rethink AI copyright plans
Hundreds of leading figures from UK creative industries urge prime minister not to 'give our work away' Hundreds of leading figures and organisations in the UK's creative industries, including Coldplay, Paul McCartney, Dua Lipa, Ian McKellen and the Royal Shakespeare Company, have urged the prime
[10]
House of Lords pushes back against government's AI plans
Peers back amendment to data bill requiring AI companies to reveal which copyrighted material they have used The government has suffered another setback in the House of Lords over its plans to let artificial intelligence firms use copyright-protected work without permission. An amendment to the
[11]
Lords examine new amendment to data bill to require AI firms declare use of copyrighted content
It circumvents financial privilege grounds on which earlier version was rejected by MPs on Wednesday A new amendment to the data bill that would require artificial intelligence companies to disclose their use of copyright-protected content has been tabled, after MPs voted to remove an earlier
[12]
Tech firms must tell newspapers when they use material to train AI, under Lords plan
Lord Black, who is the deputy chairman of the Telegraph Media Group, said the "centuries-old right" to copyright protection was in danger because the Government is "legalising theft" and allowing AI to "plunder someone else's work and profit from it". During the House of Lords debate, he argued
[13]
British govt suffers setback in AI copyright battle
The British government suffered a setback to its plans to make it easier for AI companies to access data as the House of Lords backed more protection for content creators on Monday. The Labour government under Prime Minister Keir Starmer wants to introduce a copyright exception for commercial
[14]
Labour accused of blocking fresh AI copyright protection
Labour has been accused of "manipulating" parliamentary procedure to block new rules that would help protect artists, musicians and authors from copyright violations by AI. The Government has rejected an amendment put forward by the House of Lords, which would have required tech companies to tell
[15]
UK House of Lords backs amendment to AI bill thanks to peer vote that forces companies to reveal copyrighted material used in training AI models
The UK government doesn't seem to want to give people credit for their work in the name of progress. How good is the british museum, btw? In a sentence that reads like something out of a very derivative sci-fi novella, peers in the House of Lords have pushed back against the United Kingdom
[16]
Elton John, Dua Lipa, Coldplay Among 400 Artists Seeking Copyright Protection Amid A.I. Surge
Bad Bunny Finally Facing Lawsuit Over Uncleared Afrobeats Sample Elton John, Dua Lipa, Coldplay, and Florence Welch are among the over 400 artists who have signed a letter calling on British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to update copyright laws in the face of A.I. technology. "We, along with 400
[17]
British government suffers setback in AI copyright battle
Under the proposed law, companies developing AI models would not need permission from creatives to access certain content -- a plan that has provoked a fierce backlash in the cultural sector. More than 400 artists and other creatives have signed an open letter calling for the plans to be scrapped,
[18]
UK Lords Approve AI Copyright Transparency Amendment
The UK government's attempt to introduce a copyright exception for artificial intelligence (AI) training has met stiff resistance in the House of Lords, where a majority voted 272-125 in favour of an amendment requiring greater transparency from AI developers. The measure compels companies to
Share
Copy Link
Over 400 UK artists and media professionals, including Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa, support an amendment to the Data Bill requiring AI firms to disclose copyrighted works used in training models.

In a significant move, over 400 prominent figures from the UK's creative industry have rallied behind an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, aimed at protecting copyrighted works from unauthorized use in AI training. The amendment, proposed by Baroness Beeban Kidron, would require AI companies to disclose which individual copyrighted works they have used to train their models
1
2
.The open letter supporting the amendment boasts signatures from some of the UK's most renowned artists, including Paul McCartney, Dua Lipa, Elton John, and Ian McKellen. It also has backing from major media organizations such as the Financial Times, Daily Mail, and the National Union of Journalists
2
3
.Despite this strong show of support, the UK government has opposed the amendment, arguing that the fight over it "is holding back both the creative and tech sectors and needs to be resolved by new legislation"
1
. The government's preferred position has been a provision that would require copyright holders to formally opt-out of having their work used to train AI models5
.In a significant development, the British House of Lords passed the amendment with a vote of 272 to 125
1
5
. This decision sends the bill back to the House of Commons, where the amendment could potentially be removed again. The passage of the amendment in the House of Lords represents a crucial step in the ongoing debate over AI and copyright protection.Supporters of the amendment argue that it is essential for protecting the UK's creative industries, which contribute significantly to the national economy. Baroness Kidron emphasized the sector's importance, stating, "It is an assault on the British economy and it is happening at scale to a sector worth £120bn to the UK, an industry that is central to the industrial strategy and of enormous cultural import"
1
.Related Stories
The debate in the UK reflects a broader global conversation about AI and copyright. Companies like OpenAI and Meta have faced legal challenges over alleged unauthorized use of copyrighted material in training their AI models
1
2
. The outcome of this legislative process in the UK could have far-reaching implications for how AI companies operate and how creative works are protected in the digital age.As the bill returns to the House of Commons, the creative industry remains hopeful that their concerns will be addressed. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has been exploring alternative proposals, including a potential licensing system for copyright holders and AI developers
5
. This suggests that there may be room for compromise as the government seeks to balance the interests of the creative and tech sectors.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
06 Mar 2026•Policy and Regulation

20 May 2025•Policy and Regulation

28 May 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Science and Research

3
Technology
