2 Sources
[1]
European Parliament builds its own AI platform for MEPs
MEPs and their staff are already drafting speeches, questions and amendments with AI. The European Parliament's fix is to give them an official chatbot of its own, so they stop pasting draft laws into public tools. The European Parliament has a problem with AI, and its answer is more AI. Lawmakers keep using public chatbots to help write legislation. So the institution is building a sanctioned platform to bring that habit under control. The internal tool, called EPGenAI Hub, will give MEPs and staff access to models from Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic and France's Mistral. The Parliament is testing it now and could begin the rollout as early as September, Politico reported. Why now AI has quietly seeped into the daily work of the Parliament. About 2,100 people, roughly 20% of staff, use it every day. The worry is what that is doing to the law. At a meeting this month, several committee chairs raised the alarm that MEPs and assistants were leaning on AI to draft amendments and other legislative work. The tells are hard to miss: a surge in amendments needing translation, recognisable drafting styles, and the odd hallucinated reference to a law that does not exist. "Parliament has not been immune to AI slop and misleading AI-generated content," said Brando Benifei, the lawmaker who steered the EU's AI Act. "MEPs must lead by example as the AI Act's transparency rules become applicable." What the Hub offers The platform lets users pick their model based on how sensitive the task is. Some run inside the Parliament's own systems, including Meta's Llama, OpenAI's GPT-OSS and Mistral Small. Others are more powerful services hosted outside, such as ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet. The goal is to stop officials feeding parliamentary material into uncontrolled public apps. The Parliament has already shown it to staff at workshops, one of which promised to help them "work smarter and faster." A governance gap The rules have not kept up. MEPs face no obligation to disclose whether an amendment, question or speech was written with AI. Committee chairs asked the secretary-general to draw up guidelines. They heard the job may instead fall to the constitutional affairs committee, which would have to rewrite the Parliament's rules. Staff already have their own rules, from April 2024 and now due for a rewrite. They must label AI-assisted work, and cannot put sensitive information into public AI tools. Not everyone is comfortable with the drift. Barry Andrews, an Irish Renew MEP, said some colleagues clearly use AI to draft questions, speeches and amendments. "I fully understand, given our workload," he said. "But for me personally, these are core democratic functions which voters elected us to perform." The sovereignty snag There is an awkward contradiction here. The rollout leans heavily on American AI, even as Brussels pushes to cut its dependence on US technology. The Parliament has been chasing digital sovereignty elsewhere, swapping Google for the French search engine Qwant and switching off built-in AI on MEPs' tablets over data-protection fears. Now it is opening its doors wider to US firms. The mix may not last. The Parliament's press service said the models on offer are under review. Open-source and EU sovereign models are becoming available through cloud providers the European Commission recently contracted. For now, the institution writing Europe's AI rulebook is still working out how to use the technology itself.
[2]
'Parliament has not been immune to AI slop': The EU is about to roll out its own AI platform -- including tools from OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic and Mistral
The European Parliament wants secure AI for legislative use * The European Parliament is introducing a secure AI platform for legislative use * The officially sanctioned platform will allow MEPs and staff to use AI models * AI slop and hallucinations have become a problem for the European Parliament The European Union is planning to introduce an officially sanctioned AI platform to provide European lawmakers with a safer alternative to publicly available AI tools. The platform, dubbed the 'EPGenAI Hub', will include Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Mistral models designed for legislative purposes. Multiple Members of European Parliament (MEPs) have raised concerns about the growing use of AI within the European Parliament, prompting the development of a platform that doesn't feed sensitive information into public models. Around 20% of the parliament's current staff use AI tools in their daily work - or about 2,100 people - which has contributed to some legislative materials containing errors and AI hallucinations. EU to adopt new AI platform "Parliament has not been immune to AI slop and misleading AI-generated content," said Brando Benifei, the Socialists and Democrats lawmaker. "MEPs must lead by example as the AI Act's transparency rules become applicable." Benifei led the European Parliament's work on producing the AI Act. Currently, there are no regulations that force MEPs to disclose if AI tools have been used to draft or amend legislative materials, but Irish Renew lawmaker Barry Andrews said that there is obvious evidence of AI use throughout the European Parliament. "That is their choice and I fully understand given our workload," he said, "But for me personally, these are core democratic functions which voters elected us to perform." There are guidelines in place for parliamentary employees however, with Politico reporting that any materials modified or produced using AI tools must include an "AI-assisted" disclaimer, and employees are not allowed to feed sensitive information into AI tools. MEPs and European Parliament staff have been given demos of the new EPGenAI Hub. The platform runs on the parliament's own infrastructure and external hosting, allowing the secure use of a range of AI models such as Meta's Llama, OpenAI's GPT-OSS, Mistral Small, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.
Share
Copy Link
The European Parliament is launching EPGenAI Hub, an internal AI platform for MEPs and staff, after discovering that roughly 2,100 people use public chatbots daily to draft legislation. The platform will offer models from OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic, and Mistral to prevent sensitive parliamentary material from being fed into uncontrolled public tools. The rollout could begin as early as September 2025.
The European Parliament is building its own AI platform to address a growing concern: lawmakers and staff are using public chatbots to help draft legislation, potentially exposing sensitive parliamentary material to uncontrolled systems. The internal tool, called EPGenAI Hub, will provide MEPs and their teams with access to models from OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic, and France's Mistral
1
. Currently in testing, the secure AI platform for legislative use could begin its rollout as early as September, according to reports1
.The move comes as AI use among MEPs and staff has quietly become widespread. About 2,100 people, roughly 20% of parliamentary staff, now use AI tools in their daily work
2
. This surge has raised alarms among committee chairs who notice telltale signs: a flood of amendments requiring translation, recognizable AI drafting styles, and occasional hallucinations referencing laws that don't exist1
.
Source: TechRadar
Brando Benifei, the lawmaker who steered the EU's AI Act through Parliament, acknowledged the problem directly. "Parliament has not been immune to AI slop and misleading AI-generated content," he said. "MEPs must lead by example as the AI Act's transparency rules become applicable"
1
2
. The concern extends beyond technical errors. AI-generated errors in legislative work could undermine the quality of laws being written, while the use of public tools poses data security risks when sensitive legislative materials are involved.The internal AI platform for MEPs aims to bring this activity under institutional control. EPGenAI Hub will let users select models based on task sensitivity. Some models, including Meta's Llama, OpenAI's GPT-OSS, and Mistral Small, will run on the Parliament's own infrastructure. More powerful services like ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet will be hosted externally
1
2
. The Parliament has already demonstrated the platform to staff at workshops, promoting it as a way to "work smarter and faster"1
.A significant governance gap remains. MEPs currently face no obligation to disclose whether amendments, questions, or speeches were produced with AI assistance. Committee chairs have requested that the secretary-general develop guidelines, though the task may fall to the constitutional affairs committee, which would need to rewrite the Parliament's rules
1
. Staff already operate under guidelines established in April 2024, which require them to label AI-assisted work and prohibit feeding sensitive information into public AI tools1
.The ethical dimension troubles some lawmakers. Irish Renew MEP Barry Andrews noted that colleagues clearly use AI to draft legislation. "I fully understand, given our workload," he said. "But for me personally, these are core democratic functions which voters elected us to perform"
1
2
. This tension between efficiency and democratic accountability is likely to intensify as AI becomes more capable.Related Stories
The platform's reliance on American AI models creates an awkward contradiction for an institution that has championed digital sovereignty. The European Parliament has previously swapped Google for French search engine Qwant and disabled built-in AI on MEPs' tablets over data-protection concerns
1
. Now it's opening doors wider to US firms precisely when Brussels is pushing to reduce dependence on American technology.This arrangement may prove temporary. The Parliament's press service indicated that the models available through EPGenAI Hub are under review. Open-source and EU sovereign models are becoming available through cloud providers recently contracted by the European Commission
1
. The institution writing Europe's AI rulebook is still determining how to use the technology itself while maintaining consistency with its broader policy goals. As transparency requirements from the AI Act begin to apply, the Parliament will need to demonstrate that it can meet the same standards it imposes on others when it comes to draft legislation and AI-assisted work.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
