European Parliament builds EPGenAI Hub as AI slop infiltrates legislative work

2 Sources

Share

The European Parliament is launching EPGenAI Hub, an internal AI platform for MEPs and staff, after discovering that roughly 2,100 people use public chatbots daily to draft legislation. The platform will offer models from OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic, and Mistral to prevent sensitive parliamentary material from being fed into uncontrolled public tools. The rollout could begin as early as September 2025.

European Parliament Tackles AI Use With Sanctioned Platform

The European Parliament is building its own AI platform to address a growing concern: lawmakers and staff are using public chatbots to help draft legislation, potentially exposing sensitive parliamentary material to uncontrolled systems. The internal tool, called EPGenAI Hub, will provide MEPs and their teams with access to models from OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic, and France's Mistral

1

. Currently in testing, the secure AI platform for legislative use could begin its rollout as early as September, according to reports

1

.

The move comes as AI use among MEPs and staff has quietly become widespread. About 2,100 people, roughly 20% of parliamentary staff, now use AI tools in their daily work

2

. This surge has raised alarms among committee chairs who notice telltale signs: a flood of amendments requiring translation, recognizable AI drafting styles, and occasional hallucinations referencing laws that don't exist

1

.

Source: TechRadar

Source: TechRadar

AI Slop and Legislative Integrity Concerns

Brando Benifei, the lawmaker who steered the EU's AI Act through Parliament, acknowledged the problem directly. "Parliament has not been immune to AI slop and misleading AI-generated content," he said. "MEPs must lead by example as the AI Act's transparency rules become applicable"

1

2

. The concern extends beyond technical errors. AI-generated errors in legislative work could undermine the quality of laws being written, while the use of public tools poses data security risks when sensitive legislative materials are involved.

The internal AI platform for MEPs aims to bring this activity under institutional control. EPGenAI Hub will let users select models based on task sensitivity. Some models, including Meta's Llama, OpenAI's GPT-OSS, and Mistral Small, will run on the Parliament's own infrastructure. More powerful services like ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet will be hosted externally

1

2

. The Parliament has already demonstrated the platform to staff at workshops, promoting it as a way to "work smarter and faster"

1

.

Governance Gap and Democratic Accountability

A significant governance gap remains. MEPs currently face no obligation to disclose whether amendments, questions, or speeches were produced with AI assistance. Committee chairs have requested that the secretary-general develop guidelines, though the task may fall to the constitutional affairs committee, which would need to rewrite the Parliament's rules

1

. Staff already operate under guidelines established in April 2024, which require them to label AI-assisted work and prohibit feeding sensitive information into public AI tools

1

.

The ethical dimension troubles some lawmakers. Irish Renew MEP Barry Andrews noted that colleagues clearly use AI to draft legislation. "I fully understand, given our workload," he said. "But for me personally, these are core democratic functions which voters elected us to perform"

1

2

. This tension between efficiency and democratic accountability is likely to intensify as AI becomes more capable.

Digital Sovereignty Contradictions

The platform's reliance on American AI models creates an awkward contradiction for an institution that has championed digital sovereignty. The European Parliament has previously swapped Google for French search engine Qwant and disabled built-in AI on MEPs' tablets over data-protection concerns

1

. Now it's opening doors wider to US firms precisely when Brussels is pushing to reduce dependence on American technology.

This arrangement may prove temporary. The Parliament's press service indicated that the models available through EPGenAI Hub are under review. Open-source and EU sovereign models are becoming available through cloud providers recently contracted by the European Commission

1

. The institution writing Europe's AI rulebook is still determining how to use the technology itself while maintaining consistency with its broader policy goals. As transparency requirements from the AI Act begin to apply, the Parliament will need to demonstrate that it can meet the same standards it imposes on others when it comes to draft legislation and AI-assisted work.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved