6 Sources
[1]
How Intel got left behind in the AI chip boom
Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe. In 2005, there was no inkling of the artificial intelligence boom that would come years later. But directors at Intel, whose chips served as electronic brains in most computers, faced a decision that might have altered how that
[2]
Intel's former CEO tried to buy Nvidia nearly 2 decades ago
Tech pioneer Intel (INTC+0.86%) has seemingly missed out on the artificial intelligence boom -- and part of it can reportedly be traced back to a decision not to buy the chipmaker at the center of it all almost two decades ago. Intel's former chief executive Paul Otellini wanted to buy Nvidia in
[3]
Intel's former CEO pushed for the chip maker to buy Nvidia for $20 billion in 2005 -- the GPU company is now worth $3.5 trillion
I don't think this so-called "Nvidia" will turn out to be much, anyway. Best left alone, I reckon. As some hockey player once said, "you miss 100% of the shots you don't take". Or in Intel's case, you miss out on buying a company that's currently sitting second on the list of most valuable
[4]
How Intel got left behind in the AI chip boom
Some Intel executives believed that the underlying design of graphics chips could eventually take on important new jobs in data centers, an approach that would eventually dominate AI systems. But the board resisted, according to two people familiar with the boardroom discussion who spoke only on
[5]
How Intel Got Left Behind in the A.I. Chip Boom
Steve Lohr has written about the tech industry since the 1990s. Don Clark has covered the chip industry for more than 35 years. In 2005, there was no inkling of the artificial intelligence boom that would come years later. But directors at Intel, whose chips served as electronic brains in most
[6]
Intel's former CEO reportedly wanted to buy Nvidia for $20 billion in 2005 -- Nvidia is worth over $3 trillion today
In 2005, Intel CEO Paul Otellini surprised the company's board. According to a report from the New York Times, he suggested that Intel buy Nvidia for "as much as" $20 billion. According to the Times's sources ("two people familiar with the boardroom discussion"), even some Intel executives thought
Share
Copy Link
In 2005, Intel's then-CEO Paul Otellini proposed buying Nvidia for $20 billion, a decision that could have altered the course of AI chip development. The board's rejection of this proposal has had far-reaching consequences for Intel's position in the AI market.

In 2005, Intel faced a pivotal moment that would have significant ramifications for its future in the artificial intelligence (AI) chip market. Then-CEO Paul Otellini presented the board with a bold proposal: acquire Nvidia, a rising star in computer graphics chips, for up to $20 billion
1
2
. This decision, made long before the current AI boom, could have dramatically altered Intel's trajectory in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.Some Intel executives recognized the potential of Nvidia's graphics chip design for future data center applications, an insight that would prove prescient in the age of AI
1
. Nvidia's approach of breaking tasks into parallel processes across multiple processors would later become crucial for AI computations5
.Despite the potential, Intel's board was hesitant. The company had a poor track record with acquisitions, and the $20 billion price tag would have made it Intel's most expensive purchase to date
1
4
. Faced with board skepticism, Otellini withdrew the proposal, a moment later described by an attendee as "fateful"1
3
.The consequences of this decision have become starkly apparent:
1
4
.2
4
.4
5
.In lieu of acquiring Nvidia, Intel pursued an in-house project called Larrabee, led by current CEO Pat Gelsinger
3
5
. This ambitious effort aimed to combine graphics capabilities with Intel's traditional chip design. However, after four years and significant investment, Larrabee failed due to poor performance and scheduling issues3
5
.Related Stories
Intel's struggles extend beyond the missed Nvidia opportunity:
4
.4
5
.2
3
.As Intel grapples with its diminished market position, industry observers speculate about its future. Some even consider the once-unthinkable possibility of Intel becoming an acquisition target
4
5
. The company's journey serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of long-term vision and adaptability in the fast-paced tech industry.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
