2 Sources
[1]
Japanese acting union fights back against AI-generated voice use, proposing strict new guidelines, especially regarding the use of a deceased actor's voice
The Japan Actors Union has issued new rules, guidelines, and restrictions related to AI-generated voice use. This includes an outright ban on the replication of the voices of dead actors, unless the actor had authorised its use during their lifetime. Per Automaton, these guidelines are meant to
[2]
Voice Of Goku Responds To AI Stealing Her Voice: 'I can't Forgive Them...It Makes Me Really Angry, It's No Different Than Theft' - Kotaku
A union representing gaming and anime voice actors has issued guidance on the issue after many high-profile voice actors spoke out against generative AI With generative AI becoming more and more of an issue for creatives in all industries, voice actors in Japan are finding their own way to fight
Share
Copy Link
The Japan Actors Union has unveiled strict new guidelines to protect voice rights against AI-generated voice technology. The rules require consent at every stage of AI voice replication, mandate royalties for AI-generated performances, and ban the unauthorized use of a deceased actor's voice unless pre-approved during their lifetime.
The Japan Actors Union has issued comprehensive guidelines targeting the unauthorized use of generative AI in voice acting, marking a significant push to protect voice rights in an industry increasingly threatened by AI-generated voice technology
1
. The strict new guidelines, presented at a press conference on Thursday, represent the first formal framework in Japan addressing AI voice replication and cover approximately 2600 voice actors and actors2
.These rules define AI-generated voice recordings as any audio made with technology replicating actors' voices, including voice synthesis, deep learning, and machine learning applications. The move comes after years of voice actors in Japan fighting against AI stealing their voices, with notable cases including Kenjiro Tsuda's lawsuit against TikTok over AI-generated voice imitations, though the case was dismissed after the videos were removed
2
.The Japan Actors Union guidelines establish four critical protections for voice actors. First, consent must be granted at every stage of the generative AI process, requiring AI companies to obtain permission from actors before training models on their performances
1
. This addresses the core issue of unauthorized use of generative AI that has plagued the industry.Second, AI voice replication must be counted as a new performance under these industry-wide rules, meaning royalties or compensation must be paid by AI companies to the actors involved
1
. This provision ensures voice actors receive financial recognition when their voices are replicated through artificial intelligence.The third protection covers AI-powered translations that automatically convert an actor's performance to another language. These translations must maintain the artistic integrity of the original performance and cannot be used without permission in overseas regions
1
. The fourth and most stringent rule addresses the deceased actor's voice, implementing an outright ban unless the actor had authorized its use during their lifetime, with additional requirements for family consent and copyright payments1
.At the press conference, Masako Nozawa, legendary voice of Goku in the Dragon Ball franchise, delivered a powerful statement against AI stealing her voice. "I can't forgive them for using it without my permission. It makes me really angry, it's no different than theft," Nozawa told Japanese news broadcaster NHK
2
. She emphasized that her voice and performances belong to her, demanding permission for any use, and criticized AI-generated versions for lacking heart.The involvement of high-profile voice actors like Nozawa and Kenjiro Tsuda, known for roles in Attack on Titan, Chainsaw Man, and Yu-Gi-Oh!, underscores the widespread concern among Japanese performers about losing work opportunities to AI voice replication
2
. In 2024, a group of voice actors even created their own organization protesting AI voice misuse, specifically citing the lack of legal copyright protections2
.Related Stories
While the Japan Actors Union guidelines are not legally binding laws, they represent mounting pressure on AI companies and Japan's government to establish formal protections. "The Japan Actors Union will strive to not just establish these guidelines as industry-wide rules, but also strengthen its efforts to encourage the government to legislate regulations that protect 'voice rights,'" the union stated
1
. The organization emphasized that while technological advancements will continue, "living, breathing human expression" and respect for rights must remain central.
Source: Eurogamer
Japan's government is currently facing questions on how to address generative AI in response to both cyberattacks and copyright infringement, making this announcement particularly timely
2
. The guidelines send a strong signal against unauthorized AI use in a country where the technology is generally more accepted than in the United States. Given the relative strength of Japan's unions compared to those in the U.S., these strict new guidelines are likely to significantly impact how AI companies approach voice synthesis and replication. The Japan Actors Union's framework may also influence similar efforts by Western voice actor collectives, some of which have described AI's impact on their field as "catastrophic"1
.Summarized by
Navi
30 Sept 2026•Policy and Regulation

30 Oct 2024•Technology

26 May 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Business and Economy
