Sony and Warner Sue Anthropic for Billions Over Alleged Mass Copyright Infringement in AI Training

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

18 Sources

Share

Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell have filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, alleging the AI company engaged in a brazen campaign of illegally torrenting thousands of copyrighted musical works to train Claude. The publishers seek up to $150,000 per infringed work, potentially totaling billions in damages.

Music Publishers Launch Major Copyright Infringement Case Against Anthropic

Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell have filed a federal lawsuit against Anthropic and its co-founders Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann, accusing the AI company of conducting what they call "one of the largest and most blatant ongoing thefts of intellectual property in history."

1

2

Filed late Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the complaint alleges that Anthropic engaged in a brazen campaign of illegally torrenting, scraping, and downloading copyrighted works on a massive scale to develop its Claude AI model.

4

Source: The Next Web

Source: The Next Web

Publishers Seek Up to $150,000 Per Infringed Work

The music publishers are seeking damages of up to $150,000 for each infringed copyright and $25,000 for each instance of Anthropic removing copyright management information.

5

Given that the complaint alleges "thousands upon thousands" of copyrighted musical compositions were illegally harvested, the total damages could exceed billions of dollars.

3

The lawsuit specifically mentions that Anthropic pirated song lyrics and sheet music from artists including The Beatles, Taylor Swift, Michael Jackson, and hundreds of others to train Claude to respond to human prompts.

4

Internal Messages Reveal "Zlibrary My Beloved" Comments

The lawsuit reveals damaging internal communications from Anthropic staff that appear to celebrate piracy. According to the complaint, Anthropic's mass campaign of illegal torrenting began in July 2021 when co-founder Benjamin Mann personally used BitTorrent to download millions of pirated books from Library Genesis (LibGen).

1

After the FBI shut down LibGen, Anthropic allegedly gained access to Z-Library through the Pirate Library Mirror (PiLiMi). Mann reportedly directed employees to torrent PiLiMi, messaging that it dropped "just in time!" An Anthropic staffer responded with "zlibrary my beloved," which publishers cite as proof the company extolled the use of piracy.

1

Source: Futurism

Source: Futurism

Anthropic's $1.5 Billion Settlement Called Insufficient Deterrent

This lawsuit follows Anthropic's landmark $1.5 billion settlement in September 2025 with a group of authors who accused the company of pirating more than 7 million books for AI training purposes.

1

The music publishers argue that this settlement was inadequate, stating that "$1.5 billion is obviously not a large enough settlement to deter infringing conduct by a company that has parlayed such mass infringement into a staggering $2-trillion-dollar valuation."

1

They claim Anthropic "clearly considers that to be just the cost of doing business given that its entire business model continues to be built on copyright theft."

3

Complex Training Methods Complicate Copyright Claims

Publishers acknowledge that Anthropic denies using torrented books to train commercial Claude AI models directly. However, they argue the company's statements depend on how "training" is defined.

1

The complaint explains that Anthropic trained at least one commercially released Claude model using synthetic data created by a non-commercial AI model that was trained on text from LibGen and PiLiMi. Additionally, recently unsealed documents revealed that Anthropic continues using the LibGen dataset for guardrails, specifically to check if output text too closely matches source material.

1

Claude Allegedly Reproduces Lyrics and Generates Competing Works

The publishers claim that without an injunction ending improper AI training, Anthropic will continue violating music copyrights by reproducing song lyrics verbatim and generating "new" songs that mimic the heart of popular works.

1

Sony and Warner allege that Anthropic used their copyrighted musical works to teach Claude to "generate vast quantities of purportedly 'new' AI-generated song lyrics, which compete with Music Publishers' legitimate copyrighted works as harmful market substitutes."

4

For example, Anthropic may rely on songbooks to respond to prompts asking Claude to change Eminem lyrics into a song written in "Beyonce's style."

1

Source: Ars Technica

Source: Ars Technica

Growing Wave of Copyright Litigation Against AI Companies

This lawsuit represents the latest in a wave of intellectual property theft cases brought against tech companies by copyright owners, including authors, publishers, music labels, and news outlets over the use of their work for AI training.

4

Universal Music Group sued Anthropic in 2023 over alleged use of copyrighted song lyrics, with that case still ongoing and publishers now seeking more than $3 billion in damages as of January 2026.

3

The publishers claim that through discovery, they will reveal the full extent of Anthropic's illegal scraping and downloading activities by examining torrent downloads from pirate libraries.

1

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved