5 Sources
[1]
Tesla, Warner Bros fend off some claims in 'Blade Runner 2049' ad dispute
April 7 (Reuters) - Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD.O), opens new tab won a tentative ruling on Monday dismissing some claims by movie studio Alcon Entertainment over their alleged misuse of imagery from the film "Blade Runner 2049" to promote Tesla's autonomous
[2]
Blade Runner 2049 AI Lawsuit Rules That Elon Musk's Tesla Can Still Be Sued for Copyright Infringement
Tesla's presentation last year for a Cybercab gave sci-fi dystopia vibes that drew concern from Alcon Entertainment. Things are getting too meta in this dystopian landscape. Blade Runner 2049's production company Alcon Entertainment has sued Tesla and Elon Musk for allegedly feeding stills from
[3]
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in 'Blade Runner 2049' lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports. The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to
[4]
'Blade Runner 2049' vs Elon Musk case set to go ahead
A lawsuit filed by a production company for the film Blade Runner 2049 against Elon Musk's Tesla is set to go ahead. As we reported last year, Alcon Entertainment said in its lawsuit that Musk used AI-generated imagery mirroring scenes from its 2017 sci-fi film while presenting Tesla's new
[5]
Round One of 'Blade Runner 2049' Legal Battle Over AI Images Goes to Warner Bros. and Elon Musk
Mattel Retreats From DEI Disclosures Amid Government Crackdown A federal judge has narrowed the scope of a lawsuit from a production company for Blade Runner 2049 accusing Tesla of feeding images from the movie into an artificial intelligence image generator to create unlicensed promotional
Share
Copy Link
A federal judge has dismissed some claims in a lawsuit against Tesla and Warner Bros. over alleged misuse of 'Blade Runner 2049' imagery, while allowing copyright infringement claims to proceed.

In a recent legal development, U.S. District Judge George Wu has issued a tentative ruling in the lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment against Tesla and Warner Bros. Discovery. The case revolves around the alleged misuse of imagery from the film "Blade Runner 2049" to promote Tesla's autonomous cybercab
1
2
.Judge Wu dismissed several claims in the lawsuit, including allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated Alcon's rights under U.S. trademark law. The judge noted that Tesla CEO Elon Musk only referenced the original "Blade Runner" film during the event and emphasized that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors in the same industry
1
.However, the court allowed Alcon to continue pressing claims that Tesla infringed its copyright in the movie. The judge stated it was "not at all implausible" that Tesla may have used an AI image generator to create promotional materials similar to scenes from "Blade Runner 2049"
3
4
.The controversy stems from Tesla's unveiling of its new cybercab last year. Alcon alleges that Tesla used AI-generated images mimicking the film to promote the vehicle after Alcon had refused a request from Warner Bros. to use images from the film for the event
1
2
.Alcon's lawsuit claims that Tesla fed stills from "Blade Runner 2049" into an AI image generator to create unlicensed promotional materials. The production company specifically pointed to an image of a male figure in a trench coat surveying a ruined city, which they argue was intended to evoke Ryan Gosling's character from the film
5
.This case raises novel questions about whether the creation of visuals by AI image generators, using portions of copyrighted work without a license, constitutes copyright infringement. The court's decision to allow the copyright claims to proceed suggests that this issue will be further explored as the case continues
5
.Related Stories
While most claims against Warner Bros. were dismissed, the court allowed one claim for contributory infringement to proceed. This claim accuses the studio of inducing the alleged misconduct. However, the judge agreed that Warner Bros. was not responsible for overseeing Tesla's work related to the presentation
4
5
.This legal battle highlights the growing intersection of AI technology, intellectual property rights, and marketing strategies in the tech and entertainment industries. It also underscores the potential risks and legal complexities that arise when companies leverage cultural properties and advanced technologies in their promotional efforts
2
3
4
.As the case moves forward, it will likely set important precedents for how AI-generated content is treated under copyright law, potentially influencing future collaborations between tech companies and the entertainment industry
5
.Summarized by
Navi
[3]
16 Sept 2025•Technology

22 Oct 2024•Technology

13 Jun 2025•Technology

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
