2 Sources
[1]
Trump administration official says some CHIPS Act companies won't need to give up equity
Unlike Intel, TSMC and Micron will be exempt due to their expanded investments. Last week, the Trump administration said it might take a stake in Intel in exchange for the $10.86 billion in federal grants the company is receiving from the Chips and Science (CHIPS) Act. However, not all companies
[2]
Towards US government involvement in Micron?
The administration has unveiled plans to convert part of the CHIPS Act subsidies paid to Intel into a stake of nearly 10%. The move would strengthen the competitiveness of the US chipmaker, which is still lagging behind its two major rivals: Arm in the CPU segment and TSMC in foundry services. For
Share
Copy Link
The Trump administration's proposal to take equity in chip companies receiving CHIPS Act funding has sparked discussions and potential changes in the semiconductor industry, with varying implications for different companies.
The Trump administration has proposed taking equity stakes in companies receiving funding from the Chips and Science (CHIPS) Act, sparking a debate in the semiconductor industry. This move could significantly impact the competitive landscape and government involvement in this strategic sector
1
.
Source: Engadget
Intel, which is set to receive $10.86 billion in federal grants, might be required to give up equity in exchange for the funding. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stated, "Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action." This could result in the government taking a stake of nearly 10% in Intel
1
2
.However, not all companies receiving CHIPS Act funds will face the same requirements. TSMC and Micron, which have significantly increased their US investments, may be exempt from giving up equity. An unnamed government official stated, "The Commerce Department is not looking to take equity from TSMC and Micron." This exemption is likely due to their expanded investments in US facilities
1
.TSMC, which was awarded $6.6 billion for its Arizona plant, has reportedly held preliminary discussions about potentially returning subsidies if asked to give up equity. The company has announced plans to invest an additional $100 billion over the next four years in US facilities, including three more fabrication plants and two advanced packaging facilities
1
.The government's attempts to take equity in companies may face legal challenges due to existing contract language. Currently, companies are required to share revenue with the US government if profits exceed a certain threshold. This existing arrangement may complicate efforts to implement equity stakes
1
.In a related development, the US government is considering diverting up to $2 billion in CHIPS Act funding toward critical minerals projects within the country. This move aims to reduce US dependence on China for key minerals used in electronics and defense industries
1
.Related Stories
The potential government involvement in chip companies could have far-reaching effects on the industry's competitive landscape. For Intel, this move could help strengthen its position against rivals like Arm in the CPU segment and TSMC in foundry services
2
.
Source: Market Screener
Micron, a key player in the HBM memory chip market essential for GPUs used in data centers, is also being mentioned in market rumors as a potential candidate for government involvement. With only three global players in this critical segment (Micron, SK Hynix, and Samsung), strengthening Micron's position could be strategically important for the US
2
.The proposal raises questions about how the US government would justify taking stakes in foreign companies like TSMC (Taiwan) and Samsung (South Korea), which are also receiving CHIPS Act subsidies. This issue becomes particularly complex given the strategic importance of the semiconductor industry in areas such as artificial intelligence
2
.As negotiations continue and the situation evolves, it's clear that this potential shift in US government involvement in the semiconductor industry could have significant implications for global technology and economic landscapes.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
23 Aug 2025•Business and Economy

15 Aug 2025•Business and Economy

25 Aug 2025•Business and Economy

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Science and Research
