2 Sources
[1]
Vertiv Enables Enterprises to Scale AI from Pilot Projects to Production
Vertiv Holdings Co. and Deloitte Center for Integrated Research introduced a collaboration to help enterprises address a critical challenge in moving artificial intelligence from experimentation to production: determining where AI workloads should run and whether the available physical
[2]
Vertiv Helps Enterprises Move from AI Pilots to Production
New deployment guide, informed by Vertiv and STL Partners research, helps organizations determine their AI archetypes and where the supporting infrastructure should be located Vertiv Holdings Co. and Deloitte Center for Integrated Research introduced a collaboration to help enterprises address a
Share
Copy Link
Vertiv and Deloitte unveiled a comprehensive framework to address a critical enterprise challenge: moving AI workloads from experimentation to sustained production. The Designing Infrastructure for Enterprise AI Guide provides a workload-based approach to determine deployment locations and assess whether existing physical infrastructure can support AI at scale.
Vertiv Holdings Co. and Deloitte Center for Integrated Research launched a collaboration targeting a fundamental obstacle enterprises face: transitioning artificial intelligence from pilot projects to production-ready systems
1
2
. The partnership introduces the Designing Infrastructure for Enterprise AI Guide, developed with STL Partners, a digital infrastructure research firm. This workload-based framework helps business, IT and facilities leaders determine where AI workloads should run and whether available physical infrastructure can support deployment at scale.The underlying research reveals that infrastructure readiness directly impacts where AI workloads can be deployed and how quickly they move into production
1
. Available power and cooling, connectivity and operational capacity determine whether existing facilities can support workloads or require alternative deployment models. "The next phase of enterprise AI will be shaped not only by models and computing, but also by whether organizations can provide the power, cooling, connectivity and operating environment each workload requires," said Giordano Albertazzi, CEO of Vertiv2
. This assessment becomes critical as organizations transition AI from pilot to production, where infrastructure constraints can become deployment barriers.The guide translates infrastructure considerations into a systematic four-step process. Organizations first define the intended business outcome and AI workload, then evaluate the workload's scale, performance and operating requirements
1
. Next, they determine the most appropriate deployment locations before matching the workload and location to physical infrastructure models and reference designs. Nicholas Merizzi, principal at Deloitte Consulting LLP, emphasized that "the economics and operating requirements of AI change as workloads move into production," requiring organizations to consider business value, governance, operating ownership and AI infrastructure together2
.The research categorizes enterprise AI into six archetypes covering model development, retraining and four categories of production use
1
. These archetypes help organizations identify workloads with similar performance, operating and infrastructure requirements, creating a consistent planning basis. The approach recognizes that enterprise AI represents a portfolio of workloads rather than a single infrastructure decision. Exploratory workloads may remain in cloud environments, while sustained or business-critical workloads may favor hybrid infrastructure or enterprise-managed capacity. Workloads requiring faster response times, greater control, data proximity or specific model performance may need edge infrastructure or controlled environments2
.Related Stories
Each workload archetype aligns with one of four physical infrastructure models: Edge AI Cluster, Small AI Cluster, Large AI Cluster and High-Density AI Cluster
1
. These models provide starting points for decisions involving power, cooling, controls, connectivity, resilience, operational support and future growth. The workload-specific approach allows public cloud, colocation, enterprise-owned capacity, hybrid environments and edge infrastructure to each play distinct roles. Rather than advocating for or against specific deployment models, the guide provides a consistent method for determining the appropriate operating environment for each AI workload2
.Facility readiness proves critical across all four infrastructure models. The guide helps enterprises evaluate whether proposed locations have sufficient power, cooling, connectivity, operational capacity and room for growth
1
. Conducting this assessment early helps identify infrastructure constraints before they become barriers to deployment. By starting with the workload, enterprises can make infrastructure decisions earlier, identify constraints sooner and build more credible paths from AI ambition to production. The full guide details the six workload archetypes, four physical infrastructure models and a four-phase roadmap for planning, deploying and evolving enterprise AI infrastructure, available at Vertiv.com1
.Summarized by
Navi