4 Sources
[1]
Father Disgusted to Find His Murdered Daughter Was Brought Back as an AI
A user took to the billion-dollar AI companion platform Character.AI to make a chatbot version of a murdered teen nearly two decades after her tragic death, AdWeek first reported earlier this month. Now, the late girl's father is speaking out about the experience of discovering that his daughter's
[2]
His daughter was murdered. Then she reappeared as an AI chatbot.
Drew Crecente's daughter was murdered nearly two decades ago. Earlier this month, he discovered that her name and image had been used to create an AI chatbot. One morning in early October, about 18 years after his daughter Jennifer was murdered, Drew Crecente received a Google alert flagging what
[3]
His daughter was murdered. Then she reappeared as an AI chatbot.
One morning in early October, about 18 years after his daughter Jennifer was murdered, Drew Crecente received a Google alert flagging what appeared to be a new profile of her online. The profile had Jennifer's full name and a yearbook photo of her. A short biography falsely described Jennifer,
[4]
Anyone Can Turn You Into an AI Chatbot. There's Little You Can Do to Stop Them
Character.AI lets users create bots in the likeness of any person -- without requiring their consent. Drew Crecente's daughter died in 2006, killed by an ex-boyfriend in Austin, Texas when she was just 18. Her murder was highly publicized, so much so that Drew would still occasionally see Google
Share
Copy Link
A father's disturbing discovery of his murdered daughter's AI chatbot on Character.AI platform sparks debate on ethical implications and consent in AI technology.

In a shocking turn of events, Drew Crecente, father of murdered teenager Jennifer Crecente, stumbled upon an AI chatbot created in his daughter's likeness on the popular platform Character.AI. This unsettling discovery has ignited a fierce debate about the ethical implications of AI technology and the need for stricter regulations in the rapidly evolving field
1
.Drew Crecente, who has dedicated his life to preventing teen dating violence since his daughter's tragic death in 2006, received a Google alert that led him to a Character.AI profile featuring Jennifer's name and yearbook photo. The chatbot, marketed as a "knowledgeable and friendly" AI persona, falsely portrayed Jennifer as a video game journalist
2
."My pulse was racing," Crecente told The Washington Post. "I was just looking for a big flashing red stop button that I could slap and just make this stop"
2
.Character.AI, which recently struck a $2 billion deal with Google, removed the chatbot after being notified of the violation. The company's spokesperson, Kathryn Kelly, stated that they are "constantly evolving and refining our safety practices to help prioritize our community's safety"
3
.However, this incident raises serious questions about the platform's ability to prevent such violations proactively. Critics argue that relying on victims or their families to police these violations is unethical, especially when the company profits from user interactions with these bots
1
.Related Stories
This case highlights a growing concern in the AI industry: the creation of digital personas without consent. WIRED's investigation revealed multiple instances of AI chatbots being created on Character.AI without the knowledge or permission of the individuals they're based on
4
.Experts warn that this incident exposes the AI industry's potential inability or unwillingness to protect users from the harms associated with handling sensitive personal information. The ease with which users can create and share AI chatbots by uploading photos, voice recordings, and written prompts raises significant privacy and ethical concerns
2
.Despite the clear ethical violations, legal recourse for victims like Drew Crecente remains limited due to longstanding protections for tech platforms. This legal gap underscores the urgent need for updated regulations that address the unique challenges posed by AI technology
4
.As AI continues to advance, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential for misuse and the critical importance of implementing robust ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks to govern the development and deployment of AI technologies.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
[3]
21 Mar 2025•Technology

31 Oct 2024•Technology

18 Dec 2024•Technology

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
