2 Sources
[1]
AI is being used in social services - but we must make sure it doesn't traumatise clients
Late last year, ChatGPT was used by a Victorian child protection worker to draft documents. In a glaring error, ChatGPT referred to a "doll" used for sexual purposes as an "age-appropriate toy". Following this, the Victorian information commissioner banned the use of generative artificial
[2]
AI is being used in social services -- but we must make sure it doesn't traumatize clients
by Suvradip Maitra, Lyndal Sleep, Paul Henman and Suzanna Fay, The Conversation Late last year, ChatGPT was used by a Victorian child protection worker to draft documents. In a glaring error, ChatGPT referred to a "doll" used for sexual purposes as an "age-appropriate toy." Following this, the
Share
Copy Link
A critical examination of AI's use in social services, highlighting potential benefits and risks, with a focus on preventing trauma and ensuring responsible implementation.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into social services, promising improved efficiency and enhanced service delivery. However, recent incidents have highlighted the potential risks associated with its use. In Victoria, Australia, a child protection worker's use of ChatGPT resulted in a concerning error, leading to a ban on generative AI in child protection services
1
.Several AI systems are being employed across various social service domains:
Chatbots: Used for mental health support and employment advice, but can produce harmful or inaccurate responses. The United States National Eating Disorders Association's chatbot, Tessa, was taken offline due to providing harmful weight loss advice
1
.Recommender Systems: Personalize suggestions but can be discriminatory, as seen in LinkedIn's job ad distribution favoring men over women
2
.Recognition Systems: Used for identity verification but raise privacy concerns. A Canadian homeless shelter discontinued facial recognition cameras due to consent issues with vulnerable users
1
.Risk-Assessment Systems: Predict outcomes like child abuse risk or welfare fraud but can perpetuate societal inequalities. Examples include a US tool unfairly targeting marginalized families and a Dutch system shut down for racial bias
2
.Research indicates that AI use in social services can potentially cause or exacerbate trauma for service users. With 57-75% of Australians experiencing at least one traumatic event in their lifetime, many social service providers have adopted a trauma-informed approach
1
.Related Stories
To mitigate risks and ensure responsible AI use, researchers have developed a trauma-informed AI assessment toolkit. This tool helps service providers evaluate the safety of AI systems before and during implementation. Key considerations include:
The toolkit, based on trauma-informed care principles and case studies of AI harms, is set to be piloted within organizations
2
.While AI offers potential benefits in social services, it's crucial to maintain a balance between innovation and safety. Service providers and users must be aware of AI-related risks to shape its implementation responsibly. As the field evolves, ongoing evaluation and adherence to trauma-informed principles will be essential in harnessing AI's potential while protecting vulnerable populations
1
2
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
05 May 2025•Health

01 Nov 2024•Policy and Regulation

09 Jul 2026•Health

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
