2 Sources
[1]
Alphabet investors push for safeguards on use of its cloud, AI tech
LONDON, April 29 (Reuters) - A group of Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab shareholders are pressing the company to explain how it governs and controls the use of its technology and cloud services by governments for surveillance after the tech giant rejected calls for greater disclosure. In a letter to Alphabet, seen by Reuters, the group asked for a meeting with management after the Google owner opposed a shareholder resolution seeking a report on how it oversees the related risks. "Cloud-based services are a growing segment, and it's getting more and more militarized," said Marcela Pinilla, director of sustainable investing at Zevin Asset Management, which wrote the letter signed by 42 organizations and 14 individuals managing a combined $1.15 trillion in assets. "We don't see that they have strict controls over intervention in high-risk contexts. That's very risky for â them if they don't have oversight of how their infrastructure is being used." The letter's signatories together own about $2.2 billion of Alphabet's shares, Pinilla said. Alphabet did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter. When urging shareholders to vote against the resolution, it said it had a "robust, multi-layered framework for data privacy and security" and that existing disclosures "already provide meaningful transparency around government access to data". It added that it maintains "rigorous oversight" of related risks and that a second report would be "duplicative and an ineffective use of our resources". The letter is part of a broader push by investors on data privacy and artificial intelligence governance at companies including Microsoft, Amazon and Apple, as cloud and AI services become more embedded in government and military operations. The investors said they want to understand how Alphabet assesses and mitigates the risk of misuse of â its technology and services, and how it ensures government contracts give it the authority to intervene or cancel agreements if risks escalate. A resolution calling for data on the company's human rights due diligence secured an estimated 11.9% of independent votes last year but just 4.5% of total votes, partly due to the voting power of insiders such as founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin. MASS SURVEILLANCE CONCERNS The letter cited concerns around Google's provision of services to U.S. immigration â authorities, its role in Project Nimbus - a $1.2 billion cloud computing contract with Israel - and its operations in Saudi Arabia. The Pentagon's AI chief Cameron Stanley on Tuesday confirmed to CNBC that the Department of Defense would expand its use of Google's Gemini AI model. The investor letter said its concerns were heightened after Alphabet â revised its AI Principles in 2025 to remove "categorical language restricting certain weapons and surveillance applications", increasing the importance of contractual safeguards and board-level oversight. Misuse of its technology could expose Alphabet to litigation, regulatory action or heavy fines, including penalties of up to 4% of revenue under â Europe's General Data Protection Regulation, the resolution said. Against that backdrop, Lauren Compere, head of stewardship at asset manager Boston Common, which co-filed the resolution, said it was "really disconcerting" that Alphabet had refused to engage with investors. "We've given the company plenty of chances to engage in one-on-one or small group dialogue, and they haven't come to the table," she said. Editing by Dawn Kopecki and Mark Potter Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab Simon Jessop Thomson Reuters Simon leads a team tracking how the financial system and companies more broadly are responding to the challenges posed by climate change, nature loss and other environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues including diversity and inclusion.
[2]
Alphabet investors push for safeguards on use of its cloud, AI tech
Investors are demanding answers from Alphabet regarding its technology and cloud services used by governments for surveillance. A group managing over a trillion dollars has written to the company seeking a meeting. They are concerned about the lack of strict controls on intervention in high-risk contexts. Alphabet previously opposed a shareholder resolution for a report, citing existing disclosures and frameworks. A group of Alphabet shareholders are pressing the company to explain how it governs and controls the use of its technology and cloud services by governments for surveillance after the tech giant rejected calls for greater disclosure. In a letter to Alphabet, seen by Reuters, the group asked for a meeting with management after the Google owner opposed a shareholder resolution seeking a report on how it oversees the related risks. "Cloud-based services are a growing segment, and it's getting more and more militarized," said Marcela Pinilla, director of sustainable â investing at â Zevin Asset Management, which wrote the letter signed by 42 organizations and 14 individuals managing a combined $1.15 trillion in assets. "We don't see that they have strict controls over intervention in high-risk contexts. That's very risky for them if they don't have oversight of how their infrastructure is being used." The letter's signatories together own about $2.2 billion of Alphabet's shares, Pinilla said. Alphabet did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter. When urging shareholders to vote against the resolution, it said it had a "robust, multi-layered framework for data privacy and security" and that existing disclosures "already provide meaningful transparency around government â access to data". It added that it maintains "rigorous oversight" of related risks and that a second report would be "duplicative and an ineffective use of our resources". The letter is part of a broader push by investors on data â privacy and artificial intelligence governance at companies including Microsoft, Amazon and Apple, as cloud and AI services become more embedded in government and military operations. The investors said they want to understand how Alphabet assesses and mitigates the risk of misuse of its technology and services, and how it ensures government contracts give it the authority to intervene or cancel agreements if risks escalate. A resolution calling for data on the company's human rights due diligence secured an estimated 11.9% of independent votes last year but just 4.5% of total votes, partly due to the voting power of insiders such as founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin. MASS SURVEILLANCE CONCERNS The letter cited concerns around Google's provision of services to U.S. immigration authorities, its role in Project Nimbus - a $1.2 billion cloud computing contract with Israel - and its operations in Saudi Arabia. The Pentagon's AI chief Cameron Stanley on Tuesday confirmed to CNBC that â the Department of Defense would expand its use of Google's Gemini AI model. The investor letter said its concerns were heightened after Alphabet revised its AI Principles in 2025 to remove "categorical language restricting certain weapons and surveillance applications", increasing the importance of contractual safeguards and board-level oversight. Misuse of its technology could expose Alphabet to litigation, regulatory action or heavy fines, including penalties of up to 4% of revenue under Europe's General Data Protection Regulation, the resolution said. Against that backdrop, Lauren Compere, head of stewardship at asset manager Boston Common, which co-filed the resolution, said it was "really disconcerting" that Alphabet had refused to engage with investors. "We've given the company plenty of chances to engage in one-on-one or small group dialogue, and they haven't come to the table," she said.
Share
Copy Link
Investors managing $1.15 trillion are demanding Alphabet explain how it controls cloud and AI tech used for government surveillance. The push comes after the tech giant rejected a shareholder resolution seeking greater transparency. Concerns center on militarization of cloud services, revised AI Principles, and contracts like the $1.2 billion Project Nimbus deal.
A coalition of Alphabet shareholders representing $2.2 billion in shares is pressing the tech giant to explain how it governs and controls the use of its cloud and AI tech by governments for surveillance purposes. The group, comprising 42 organizations and 14 individuals managing a combined $1.15 trillion in assets, sent a letter to Alphabet requesting a meeting with management after the company rejected an Alphabet shareholder resolution calling for greater transparency
2
.
Source: ET
Marcela Pinilla, director of sustainable investing at Zevin Asset Management, which drafted the letter, emphasized the growing risks: "Cloud-based services are a growing segment, and it's getting more and more militarized. We don't see that they have strict controls over intervention in high-risk contexts". The militarization of cloud services has become a focal point as AI governance and control mechanisms struggle to keep pace with rapidly expanding government contracts.
Alphabet urged shareholders to vote against the resolution, asserting it maintains a "robust, multi-layered framework for data privacy and security" and that existing disclosures "already provide meaningful transparency around government access to data". The company argued that producing an additional report would be "duplicative and an ineffective use of our resources"
2
.Lauren Compere, head of stewardship at Boston Common, which co-filed the resolution, expressed frustration with Alphabet's stance: "We've given the company plenty of chances to engage in one-on-one or small group dialogue, and they haven't come to the table". A similar resolution focused on human rights due diligence secured just 11.9% of independent votes last year and only 4.5% of total votes, partly due to voting power held by insiders including founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin
2
.The investor letter highlighted specific concerns about government surveillance capabilities enabled by cloud technology for surveillance purposes. These include Google's provision of services to U.S. immigration authorities, its role in Project Nimbusâa $1.2 billion cloud computing contract with Israelâand operations in Saudi Arabia. Adding to concerns, the Pentagon's AI chief Cameron Stanley confirmed that the Department of Defense would expand its use of the Google Gemini AI model
2
.
Source: Reuters
Investors want to understand how Alphabet assesses misuse risks and whether government contracts grant the company authority to intervene or cancel agreements if risks escalate. This push for oversight and intervention mechanisms reflects broader shareholder activism focused on ESG investing principles and human rights considerations.
Related Stories
Investor concerns intensified after Alphabet revised its AI Principles in 2025 to remove "categorical language restricting certain weapons and surveillance applications". This change elevated the importance of contractual safeguards and board-level oversight, particularly as cloud and AI services become more embedded in military operations. The removal of explicit restrictions on surveillance applications has prompted questions about whether adequate AI governance and control structures remain in place.
Misuse of technology could expose Alphabet to legal and financial risks, including litigation, regulatory action, or penalties of up to 4% of revenue under Europe's General Data Protection Regulation
2
. These potential consequences underscore why investors are demanding greater transparency around how the company monitors and manages government contracts.This investor pressure on Alphabet is part of a wider movement targeting data privacy and artificial intelligence governance at major tech companies including Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple. As government and military reliance on cloud services grows, shareholders are scrutinizing whether adequate safeguards exist to prevent misuse. The involvement of institutional investors like Zevin Asset Management and Boston Common signals that ESG considerations are becoming central to how investors evaluate tech companies' long-term viability and reputation.
Summarized by
Navi
04 Feb 2025â¢Business and Economy

27 Apr 2026â¢Policy and Regulation

25 Apr 2025â¢Business and Economy

1
Health

2
Technology

3
Technology
