3 Sources
[1]
Apple explains why Siri's major iOS 27 overhaul took so long
iOS 27's new Siri AI is a huge upgrade from the old Siri, but it also took longer than expected to arrive. Here's why the new Siri took so long, per Mike Rockwell. Mike Rockwell says Apple 'tore [Siri] to the ground, rebuilt it from the ground up' for iOS 27 Last week following Apple's WWDC keynote, the company held a Siri and Apple Intelligence-focused tech talk with members of the press. 9to5Mac Editor-in-Chief Chance Miller was there, and shared extensive quotes from the session here from Apple's Craig Federighi and Amar Subramanya. Another participant in the talk was Mike Rockwell, who took on leadership for Siri just last year. Rockwell provided some new context around why Siri AI took longer than hoped to ship. Here's what he said: Last year, we had actually built a first version of this that was sort of incremental on top of the original Siri that added tool calling, and we had it working. But we didn't feel it was really delivering on the vision and the experience that we wanted to do. We also had a design, which required much more extensive changes, and we decided to go with that. So we went back, and we rebuilt Siri from the ground up, literally, tore it to the ground, rebuilt it from the ground up, on top of the incredible models which Amar just told us about. It allowed us to build a profoundly more capable Siri. So it's a Siri that has its own application, it's natively multimodal, it's privacy from the ground up. And it's available across all of your platforms, which is really important to us. So you have it on iPhone, iPad, and Mac, and Watch, Vision Pro, as well as in CarPlay and AirPods. And it's the same Siri across all this. You've got a common experience. Based on Rockwell's comments, it sounds like Apple's original plan for Siri might have delivered some AI upgrades, but it wouldn't have been the full-featured revamp that iOS 27 brings. To achieve Siri AI, Apple instead opted to rebuild Siri "from the ground up." It "tore it to the ground" and rebuilt on top of its new, more modern foundation. What do you make of Rockwell's explanation for Siri AI's release timing? Let us know in the comments.
[2]
'We tore it to the ground': Apple says it built Siri AI 'from the ground up', but admits this wasn't the original plan -- a first version of its new voice assistant was ready last year
* Apple has explained why Siri's AI overhaul has taken so long * Initially, the company built an "iterative" version on top of the existing Siri, but this didn't deliver on Apple's vision * So instead Siri was then rebuilt from the ground up Siri's AI overhaul is finally set to arrive later this year, long after it was initially promised -- but Apple has now shed some light on what, exactly, took so long. In a post-WWDC talk attended by 9to5Mac and TechRadar, Mike Rockwell -- the Apple executive who took leadership of the Siri team last year -- explained that, back in 2025, the company managed to build a working version of Siri AI "that was sort of incremental on top of the original Siri" but that "we didn't feel it was really delivering on the vision and the experience that we wanted to do." As a result, the team then "rebuilt Siri from the ground up, literally, tore it to the ground," with the end result being "a profoundly more capable Siri." A necessary shift in strategy So, in other words, it sounds like Apple pivoted away from an initial plan of adding to the existing Siri after realizing this wouldn't cut it with expectant fans, and then started work on the lengthy job of completely rebuilding its digital assistant. Whether this is a satisfying explanation is debatable -- it could be argued that a company with as much talent and experience as Apple should have already known what would be necessary to build a true AI assistant, especially when there were plenty of rival models the company could look to for inspiration. But it does at least go some way to explaining why this whole endeavor has taken quite so long. And while Apple's initial goal of delivering an incremental upgrade might have been shortsighted, the ultimate decision to abandon that and rebuild Siri from the ground up was probably the right one, given how impressive the competition is in this space. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button! And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
[3]
Apple explains why the big Siri AI revamp took so long - and it actually makes a lot of sense
Apple tore Siri down and rebuilt it on the new Apple Intelligence Foundational Models. No wonder it took forever. Apple has explained why the new Siri AI assistant - powered by Google's Gemini - took so long to come to fruition. The company had received serious criticism for the long delays and even accusations it had demonstrated features that hadn't yet been realised beyond the concept stage. However, the two year delay from the original announcement at WWDC 2024 to the relaunch at WWDC can be partially explained by the revelation Apple stopped trying to retrofit existing Siri and instead admitted the need to build a replacement from the ground up. During a press roundtable at WWDC Mike Rockwell, who became the leader of the Siri platform in 2025, said the initial changes Apple had made "wasn't delivering on the vision" so it was torn down and rebuilt atop the new Apple Intelligence Foundational Models that were previously announced. During the roundtable attended by 9to5Mac, Rockwell said: "Last year, we had actually built a first version of this that was sort of incremental on top of the original Siri that added tool calling, and we had it working. But we didn't feel it was really delivering on the vision and the experience that we wanted to do. We also had a design, which required much more extensive changes, and we decided to go with that. "So we went back, and we rebuilt Siri from the ground up, literally, tore it to the ground, rebuilt it from the ground up, on top of the incredible models which Amar [Subramanya] just told us about. It allowed us to build a profoundly more capable Siri. So it's a Siri that has its own application, it's natively multimodal, it's privacy from the ground up. "And it's available across all of your platforms, which is really important to us. So you have it on iPhone, iPad, and Mac, and Watch, Vision Pro, as well as in CarPlay and AirPods. And it's the same Siri across all this. You've got a common experience." Now Apple is finally set to deliver on the vision for the new Siri that includes deeply contextual information, on-screen awareness, interaction with all of your key apps and much, much more. We're excited to give it a try.
Share
Copy Link
Apple's Mike Rockwell revealed the company scrapped a working version of Siri AI last year because it didn't meet their vision. Instead, Apple tore down the original assistant and rebuilt it entirely on new foundational models, resulting in a natively multimodal, privacy-focused AI that works seamlessly across iPhone, iPad, Mac, and more.
Apple has finally explained why the Siri AI overhaul took two years longer than expected to deliver. Mike Rockwell, who assumed leadership of the Siri platform in 2025, disclosed during a post-WWDC press roundtable that the company had actually completed a functional version of Siri AI last year
1
2
. That initial attempt was "sort of incremental on top of the original Siri that added tool calling," Rockwell explained, but the team concluded it wasn't delivering on Apple's vision for Siri3
. The decision to abandon incremental upgrades scrapped months of work but set the stage for something more ambitious.
Source: 9to5Mac
Rather than settle for modest improvements, Apple made the call to completely tear down its digital assistant. "We went back, and we rebuilt Siri from the ground up, literally, tore it to the ground, rebuilt it from the ground up, on top of the incredible models," Rockwell told attendees at the technical session
1
. The new architecture sits atop Apple Intelligence Foundational Models, which were previously announced and integrate technology from Google's Gemini3
. This fundamental shift enabled capabilities that simply weren't possible with the original Siri architecture, transforming the assistant into what Rockwell describes as "a profoundly more capable Siri."The iOS 27 release introduces a natively multimodal AI assistant that represents a significant departure from previous iterations. The redesigned Siri now operates as its own standalone application with privacy-focused AI built into its core architecture from the beginning
1
. This approach addresses longstanding concerns about data handling while enabling more sophisticated interactions. The assistant now features on-screen awareness and deeply contextual interactions that allow it to understand what users are doing across their devices3
. These capabilities position Siri to compete more effectively with rivals that have dominated the AI assistant space.
Source: TechRadar
Related Stories
Apple emphasized that the new Siri functions as a true cross-platform AI assistant, maintaining consistency across the entire ecosystem. "It's available across all of your platforms, which is really important to us. So you have it on iPhone, iPad, and Mac, and Watch, Vision Pro, as well as in CarPlay and AirPods. And it's the same Siri across all this. You've got a common experience," Rockwell stated
1
3
. This unified approach ensures users can interact with their devices seamlessly, regardless of which Apple product they're using. The consistency matters for developers building integrations and users who move between devices throughout their day.
Source: Stuff
While Rockwell's explanation provides insight into the technical decisions, some observers question whether Apple should have recognized earlier that incremental changes wouldn't suffice
2
. The company faced criticism during the two-year delay from the original WWDC 2024 announcement, with some accusing Apple of demonstrating features that existed only as concepts3
. However, the ultimate decision to prioritize quality over speed may prove correct given the competitive landscape. Users and developers will now watch closely to see whether the wait translates into meaningful advantages over established AI assistants, particularly as Apple begins rolling out the new experience later this year with interaction capabilities across key applications.Summarized by
Navi
10 Aug 2025•Technology

15 Mar 2025•Technology

11 Jun 2025•Technology

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Business and Economy
