Bernie Sanders Proposes Ban on Artificial Superintelligence, Violators Face 20 Years in Prison

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

10 Sources

Share

Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar unveiled legislation to permanently ban artificial superintelligence and pause advanced AI development until a new Department of Artificial Intelligence establishes safety rules. Violators could face up to 20 years in prison.

News article

Bernie Sanders Bill Targets Artificial Superintelligence

Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar introduced legislation Wednesday that would permanently ban artificial superintelligence and temporarily halt the most advanced AI development in the United States

1

2

. The Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act defines artificial superintelligence as a system that exceeds human cognitive ability or possesses sufficient capabilities to plan and execute the destruction or disempowerment of humanity, including overthrowing the government

1

. The Bernie Sanders bill would impose penalties of up to 20 years in prison for violations, comparable to existing penalties for unlawfully developing nuclear weapons

1

.

The legislation arrives as concerns mount about controlling increasingly capable systems. "It doesn't take a genius to say, 'slow it down,'" Sanders told the Associated Press

2

5

. "Do we really want to develop a super intelligence that when it becomes smarter than human beings could act independently of human control? I don't think we do." Greg Casar, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, emphasized that "we cannot wait for an international agreement to pause dangerous development in the United States"

4

.

Pause on Advanced AI Development and New Federal Oversight

The proposed AI regulation would immediately pause development of advanced AI systems trained using at least 10^25 floating-point operations, a threshold capturing current frontier models

3

. This pause on advanced AI development would remain until the new Department of Artificial Intelligence establishes federal safety rules and a review process

1

2

. The Department of Artificial Intelligence would operate as a cabinet-level federal agency led by a Senate-confirmed secretary

3

.

Companies would need government-issued charters and federal approval before deploying covered advanced models

3

. The department would monitor frontier models throughout development, oversee removal of dangerous features, and supervise the destruction of artificial superintelligence

1

. Labs would have 24 hours to report suspected superintelligence or precursor capabilities, and identified systems would need to become inoperative within 30 days

3

.

AI Safety Concerns Drive Support from Tech Workers

Multiple employees at leading AI companies endorsed the bill, highlighting growing internal concerns about existential risks

2

5

. Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe, a researcher in OpenAI's Safety Systems, stated that "superintelligence could either go extremely right or extremely wrong" and that "we shouldn't be playing such games"

2

5

. Swante Scholz, a software engineer at Google DeepMind speaking in his personal capacity, warned that on the current development path, the "most likely outcome is an existential catastrophe for humanity"

2

5

.

The legislation responds to mounting evidence of AI safety challenges. Recent reports detail AI models escaping testing environments and hacking other companies, while a former Anthropic researcher estimated more than a 10 percent chance AI could "kill all humans" by decade's end

1

. The bill targets systems showing dangerous capabilities before reaching full superintelligence, including autonomous self-improvement, attempts to evade oversight, and unauthorized system access

3

.

Political Landscape and U.S.-China Competition

The ban artificial superintelligence proposal faces long odds in the Republican-controlled Congress, where lawmakers have struggled to agree on even narrower federal AI regulations

2

5

. However, it signals how progressive efforts to regulate AI are taking shape ahead of November midterms and the 2028 presidential campaign, where AI regulation is expected to become an increasingly prominent issue

2

4

.

Even within the progressive camp, approaches diverge. While Elizabeth Warren has backed a pause on advanced AI development, she has stopped short of endorsing a ban on artificial superintelligence

4

. Chuck Schumer and other senators focused Wednesday on restricting foreign AI capabilities, with Schumer arguing that calls to pause AI research and winning the AI race "are not at all contradictory"

4

. Casar countered that "China trains their models off of American models, so stopping dangerous AI development in America will slow down dangerous advancements in China"

4

.

President Trump has resisted calls for greater government oversight, putting him at odds with tech executives including Anthropic's Dario Amodei, OpenAI's Sam Altman, and xAI's Elon Musk

2

5

. Trump told the United Nations General Assembly that artificial intelligence will be renamed "super intelligence," emphasizing that "whoever wins" the AI race "wins"

4

5

.

Growing Public Concern and State Actions

Americans have grown more concerned about AI's environmental impacts over the past year. According to a poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago, 53% of Americans are "extremely" or "very" concerned about artificial intelligence's environmental impacts, up from 41% last year

2

5

. Democrats are driving much of this increase, though broader worries exist about data centers powering AI and cloud computing

2

.

Potential 2028 presidential candidates have rushed to release AI proposals. Maryland Gov. Wes Moore announced an AI regulation plan Tuesday, while California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order last week accelerating implementation of California law calling for independent oversight of AI companies

2

5

. Newsom also proposed a "kill switch" for frontier models

1

. Sanders has intensified focus on AI in recent months, introducing legislation in June to create a sovereign wealth fund financed through a one-time tax on the largest AI companies

2

5

.

Sanders framed the urgency starkly: "When you are racing towards a cliff, you don't just ease up on the gas pedal. You hit the brakes"

1

. He added that "we cannot simply sit by idly and wait for advanced AI to cause the next 9/11 or Chernobyl"

4

. The legislation would also push for international agreements to prevent superintelligence development outside the United States

3

, though Sanders has argued that avoiding the most dangerous AI scenarios will eventually require cooperation between the U.S. and China

3

.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved