California Cities Secure $19.9 Million Settlement in Property Tax Dispute with Invitation Homes

Settlement Overview

Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP, along with co-counsel, has announced a landmark $19.9 million settlement on behalf of 30 California cities against Invitation Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries 1

1

. This settlement resolves allegations that the company underpaid property taxes on thousands of single-family homes across the state.

Background of the Dispute

The lawsuit, initially filed in 2020, accused Invitation Homes of exploiting a loophole in California's property tax system. The company allegedly structured its 2017 initial public offering (IPO) in a way that avoided triggering reassessments of its properties, despite a change in ownership 2

2

.

Impact on Local Governments

This settlement represents a significant victory for local governments in California. The funds recovered will help support essential public services that rely on property tax revenue. Kevin Sharp, Managing Partner of Sanford Heisler Sharp's Nashville office, emphasized the importance of the settlement, stating, "This resolution ensures that Invitation Homes pays its fair share of property taxes" 1

1

.

Legal Team and Strategy

The legal team representing the California cities included attorneys from Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP, Kralowec Law, P.C., and Hijazi Law Group, P.C. Their collaborative effort and strategic approach were crucial in achieving this substantial settlement 2

2

.

Broader Implications

This case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by local governments in ensuring fair taxation, particularly when dealing with large corporate entities. It also underscores the importance of vigilance in monitoring property ownership structures and their tax implications.

Invitation Homes' Response

While Invitation Homes has agreed to the settlement, it's worth noting that the company has not admitted to any wrongdoing. The resolution of this case without protracted litigation suggests a willingness on the part of the company to address the concerns raised by the California cities 1

1

2

2

.

Future Outlook

The settlement sets a precedent for similar cases and may prompt other jurisdictions to scrutinize property tax payments more closely, especially those involving complex corporate structures. It also serves as a reminder to companies of the importance of transparent and compliant tax practices in their operations.