5 Sources
[1]
Ultra-efficient AI won't solve data centers' climate problem. This might.
Despite DeepSeek's AI efficiency gains, data centers are still expected to gobble up huge amounts of U.S. electricity. When Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek announced a chatbot that matched the performance of cutting-edge models such as ChatGPT with a fraction of the computing power, it sparked a
[2]
DeepSeek claims to have cured AI's environmental headache. The Jevons paradox suggests it might make things worse
AI burns through a lot of resources. And thanks to a paradox first identified way back in the 1860s, even a more energy-efficient AI is likely to simply mean more energy is used in the long run. For most users, "large language models" such as OpenAI's ChatGPT work like intuitive search engines.
[3]
AI is 'an energy hog,' but DeepSeek could change that
Justine Calma is a senior science reporter covering energy and the environment with more than a decade of experience. She is also the host of Hell or High Water: When Disaster Hits Home, a podcast from Vox Media and Audible Originals. DeepSeek startled everyone last month with the claim that its
[4]
ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: which AI model Is more sustainable?
How do the environmental credentials of these ChatGPT and DeepSeek compare? By now, even casual observers of the tech world are well aware of ChatGPT, OpenAI's dazzling contribution to artificial intelligence. Its ability to generate coherent, on-point responses has upended online research and
[5]
DeepSeek might not be such good news for energy after all
The latter notion is misleading, and new numbers shared with MIT Technology Review help show why. These early figures -- based on the performance of one of DeepSeek's smaller models on a small number of prompts -- suggest it could be more energy intensive when generating responses than the
Share
Copy Link
Chinese startup DeepSeek claims to have created an AI model that matches the performance of established rivals at a fraction of the cost and carbon footprint. However, experts warn that increased efficiency might lead to higher overall energy consumption due to the Jevons paradox.

Chinese startup DeepSeek has made waves in the AI industry with its claim of creating an AI model that matches the performance of established rivals like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Meta's Llama, but at a fraction of the cost and carbon footprint
1
. The company's V3 model reportedly cost just $5 million for its final training run and used 2 million GPU hours, compared to Meta's Llama 3 model, which took about 30 million GPU hours to train3
.DeepSeek attributes its efficiency gains to several innovative techniques:
2
.3
.3
.The announcement of DeepSeek's efficient model has had significant repercussions:
2
.3
.3
.While DeepSeek's efficiency gains seem promising for reducing AI's environmental impact, experts warn of potential unintended consequences:
2
3
.1
.3
.Related Stories
Several factors complicate the evaluation of DeepSeek's true environmental impact:
3
.4
.4
.As AI continues to advance rapidly, the debate on its environmental ramifications must keep pace. Experts emphasize the need for:
4
.3
.5
.As the AI race intensifies, it's clear that efficiency alone won't solve the industry's energy challenges. A holistic approach considering both technological advancements and responsible usage will be crucial in mitigating AI's environmental impact.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
[5]
1
Science and Research

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology