4 Sources
[1]
EU antitrust regulators quiz publishers on Google's AI search opt-out
BRUSSELS, Sept 1 (Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are seeking feedback from publishers on Google's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab proposal to let them opt out of AI search without affecting their rankings in search results, a questionnaire seen by Reuters showed. The publishers' feedback could
[2]
Brussels is asking publishers whether Google's AI opt-out is any use
Google gave publishers a way to opt out of its AI search features in June without affecting their ordinary search rankings. The European Commission has spent the summer trying to work out whether that option actually gives publishers any meaningful choice. The Commission sent publishers a
[3]
EU antitrust regulators quiz publishers on Google's AI search opt-out
The publishers' feedback could determine the outcome of an ongoing EU investigation that could result in yet another hefty fine for Google if the proposal fails to address competition concerns and publishers' worries about unfair use of their content. EU antitrust regulators are seeking feedback
[4]
Google Under Pressure in EU Over AI Use of Content
Google announced in June a global rollout of this opt-out option, following a similar request from the UK's competition authority. Publishers are particularly concerned about "AI Overviews", AI-generated summaries shown above traditional links, which could reduce traffic to their sites and their
Share
Copy Link
EU antitrust regulators sent publishers a questionnaire to assess Google's AI search opt-out proposal. The feedback will determine if Google faces another major fine as publishers struggle with declining traffic from AI Overviews appearing above traditional search results.
EU antitrust regulators are actively seeking feedback from publishers regarding Google's proposal to let them opt out of AI-powered search features without affecting their search rankings
1
. The European Commission distributed a questionnaire in July with an August 28 deadline, asking publishers whether they plan to use Google's AI search opt-out and what factors influence their decision2
. This investigation could determine whether Google faces yet another substantial fine if the proposal fails to address competition concerns and publishers' worries about unfair content usage3
.
Source: The Next Web
Google announced its AI search opt-out for publishers in June, strategically timing the release on the same day the UK antitrust watchdog ordered it to allow publishers the option to stop their content from powering AI features
1
. The company plans to roll out the opt-out globally, effectively turning a requirement from one national regulator into a change applied across Google's entire search business2
. The mechanism allows publishers to exclude their content from AI-generated search summaries without impacting their position in traditional search results.Publishers are effectively choosing between two unattractive options. Staying in Google AI search means allowing their reporting to be used in AI Overviews—AI-generated summaries that appear above traditional hyperlinks—which can answer a reader's question without requiring a click to the original source
2
. Opting out protects content from these summaries but potentially costs visibility on the part of the search page that users increasingly see first. Publishers have reported click declines of up to 58%, and this impact has already contributed to antitrust litigation against Google2
. The fundamental problem remains: if AI summaries are becoming a more prominent part of search, refusing to appear in them means giving up visibility that publishers are trying to protect.The questionnaire also asked publishers for their views on changes to Google's search box announced in May, which included bringing AI Overviews and AI Mode into one unified AI Search experience
1
. Combining these features into a single AI Search experience gives publishers fewer distinct parts of the search page that they can choose to participate in or avoid2
. This consolidation matters because it changes what publishers are actually opting out of and reduces their granular control over how their content appears in different AI-powered search features.Related Stories
There exists a basic power imbalance that an opt-out cannot easily resolve. Google controls the search interface, the ranking system, and the AI features appearing within it, so it can decide both what options publishers are offered and how those options affect their visibility
2
. This helps explain why some publishers are pushing for compensation rather than simply asking for the ability to withdraw. French media organizations have asked their competition authority to make Google pay for using their content in AI-generated answers, while a German court found Google liable over its AI Overviews2
.The world's most popular internet search engine has accumulated more than €10 billion in EU antitrust fines for various violations over nearly two decades
4
. If Google's proposals are deemed insufficient by European competition authorities, the company could face another major financial penalty4
. The Commission's next step will depend partly on what publishers said in their responses. The questionnaire itself is not a competition inquiry, but it gives Brussels a way to establish whether publishers consider Google's opt-out meaningful and whether there is enough evidence to justify opening a formal investigation2
. The bigger question for publishers is whether these changes alter the basic economics of a search engine that can increasingly answer queries itself rather than sending users to the sites that produced the information.Source: Market Screener
Summarized by
Navi
[4]
04 Jul 2025•Policy and Regulation

10 Feb 2026•Policy and Regulation

09 Dec 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
