3 Sources
[1]
EU data watchdog sets terms for AI model's legitimate use of personal data
The EDPB responded to the Irish authority, clarifying AI model anonymity, the legitimacy of using personal data for their development while leaving leeway to national data protection authorities. The EU's data protection agency has clarified in what circumstances developing AI models may access
[2]
EU issues new data processing guidelines for AI firms
The Irish DPC welcomed the new guidelines, which were issued after its request in September. The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has introduced guidelines around the use of personal data for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) models. The guidelines - requested by
[3]
EU privacy body weighs in on some tricky GenAI lawfulness questions | TechCrunch
The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) published an opinion on Wednesday that explores how AI developers might use personal data to develop and deploy AI models, such as large language models (LLMs), without falling foul of the bloc's privacy laws. The Board plays a key steering role in the
Share
Copy Link
The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has released an opinion clarifying the circumstances under which AI models can use personal data, addressing issues of anonymity, legitimate interest, and legal compliance in AI development and deployment.

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has issued a significant opinion addressing the use of personal data in AI model development and deployment. This guidance, requested by the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC), aims to clarify how AI companies can comply with EU privacy laws, particularly the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
1
2
.The EDPB states that for an AI model to be considered anonymous, it must be "very unlikely" to identify individuals directly or indirectly through the data used in its creation. The assessment of anonymity should be conducted on a case-by-case basis by national data protection authorities
1
2
.The opinion outlines a three-step test for assessing whether companies have a "legitimate interest" in processing personal data for AI development without explicit consent:
1
The EDPB clearly states that AI models developed using unlawfully processed personal data may not be deployed
1
.The opinion emphasizes that national data protection authorities are responsible for assessing GDPR compliance in AI development on a case-by-case basis. This approach allows for flexibility but may lead to inconsistent enforcement across the EU
1
3
.Related Stories
The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) welcomed the ruling, stating it allows for proper AI model training using personal data. However, they called for more legal clarity to avoid future uncertainties
1
.Digital rights advocates expressed concerns about the broad discretion given to national authorities and the challenges in ensuring effective data protection. They emphasized the need for harmonization to uphold digital rights universally
1
.The EDPB is expected to issue further guidelines on emerging issues such as web scraping, which is crucial for AI development. These additional clarifications will be essential as AI continues to rely heavily on vast amounts of data
1
.This opinion provides a framework for AI developers to navigate the complex landscape of data protection regulations. It supports responsible AI innovation while ensuring personal data protection in compliance with GDPR
2
3
.The guidelines will enable proactive, effective, and consistent regulation across the EU/EEA, offering greater clarity to the industry while promoting responsible innovation
2
.As the AI landscape continues to evolve, these guidelines will play a crucial role in shaping the development and deployment of AI models in the European Union, balancing innovation with privacy protection.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
