Federal Judge Blocks California's New Law on Election Deepfakes, Citing First Amendment Concerns
14 Sources
[1]
Judge blocks new California law cracking down on election deepfakes
A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose significant risks, but he ruled
[2]
Judge blocks new California law cracking down on election deepfakes
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose
[3]
California's new AI deepfakes law gets blocked by a federal judge. Here's why
A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose significant risks, but he ruled
[4]
Judge blocks new California law cracking down on election deepfakes
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose
[5]
Judge blocks new California law cracking down on election deepfakes
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose
[6]
California's new law against election deepfakes blocked by judge over free speech worries
A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose significant risks, but he ruled
[7]
Judge Blocks California's Deepfake Crackdown Law
A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose significant risks, but he ruled
[8]
Judge Blocks New California Law Cracking Down on Election Deepfakes
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose
[9]
Judge Blocks California’s New Anti-AI Deepfake Election Bill
A California judge has blocked a bill that would punish people who knowingly spread deepfake videos online, saying it’s a threat to free speech. A judge in California ordered a preliminary injunction against AB 2839, a new California law that would punish people who knowingly share election
[10]
Judge finds new California election deepfake ban unconstitutional
A federal court judge has put a preliminary injunction over a two-week-old California law that effectively bans election deepfakes. The law -- AB 2839 -- allowed any person to sue for damages over AI deepfakes if the perpetrator's post resembles a political candidate within 120 days of an election
[11]
Judge blocks new California law barring distribution of election-related AI deepfakes
YouTube videos, Facebook posts and X tweets are protected by the First Amendment, the judge ruled. One of California's new AI laws, which aims to prevent AI deepfakes related to elections from spreading online, has been blocked a month before the US presidential elections. As TechCrunch and Reason
[12]
Judge slams California's AI deepfake law
A federal judge has made it invalid less than two weeks after California Governor Gavin Newsom signed his new AI deepfake law. AB 2839 was meant to shut down the spread of politically skewered deepfakes, including the AI-generated video of Vice President Kamala Harris redistributed by Elon Musk.
[13]
Judge blocks California's new AI law in case over Kamala Harris deepfake Musk reposted
A federal judge blocked one of California's new AI laws on Wednesday, less than two weeks after it was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom. Shortly after signing AB 2839, Newsom suggested it could be used to force Elon Musk to take down an AI deepfake of Vice President Kamala Harris he had reposted
[14]
Elon Musk Can't Contain His Joy After California Deepfakes Law Supported By Gavin Newsom Blocked By Court: 'Yay!'
Elon Musk, the high-profile CEO of Tesla Inc. and the owner of X, applauded a court decision to block a California law he deemed as infringing on freedom of speech. What Happened: On Wednesday, Musk took to X to express his relief at the court's decision. The law in question, signed by California
Share
Copy Link
A federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction against California's new law allowing individuals to sue for damages over election deepfakes. The judge ruled that the law likely violates the First Amendment, despite acknowledging the risks posed by AI and deepfakes.
California's Controversial Deepfake Law Put on Hold
In a significant legal development, U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez has granted a preliminary injunction blocking California's recently enacted law on election deepfakes. The law, which allowed individuals to sue for damages over such manipulated media, was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom last month but has now been put on pause due to First Amendment concerns
1
.Judge's Ruling and Rationale
Judge Mendez, while acknowledging the significant risks posed by artificial intelligence and deepfakes, ruled that the law likely violates the First Amendment. In his decision, he stated, "Most of AB 2839 acts as a hammer instead of a scalpel, serving as a blunt tool that hinders humorous expression and unconstitutionally stifles the free and unfettered exchange of ideas which is so vital to American democratic debate"
2
.The Contested Law and Its Context
The law in question was part of a package of bills signed by Governor Newsom aimed at cracking down on the use of artificial intelligence to create false images or videos in political ads ahead of the 2024 election. These laws are considered among the toughest of their kind in the nation
3
.Reactions to the Ruling
Izzy Gardon, a spokesperson for Governor Newsom, expressed confidence that the courts would ultimately uphold the state's ability to regulate "dangerous and misleading deepfakes." Gardon stated, "We're confident the courts will uphold the state's ability to regulate these types of dangerous and misleading deepfakes. Satire remains alive and well in California -- even for those who miss the punchline"
4
.On the other side, attorney Theodore Frank, representing YouTuber Christopher Kohls who sued state officials over the law, called the ruling "straightforward." Frank said, "We are gratified that the district court agreed with our analysis that new technologies do not change the principles behind First Amendment protections"
5
.Related Stories
First Amendment Experts' Perspective
The law had faced criticism from First Amendment experts even before its enactment. David Loy, legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, argued that existing defamation laws are sufficient to address truly harmful content. He stated, "If something is truly defamatory, there's a whole body of law and established legal standards for how to prove a claim for defamation consistent with the First Amendment. The government is not free to create new categories of speech outside the First Amendment"
1
.Implications and Next Steps
This ruling highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing the need to address the threats posed by AI-generated deepfakes with the constitutional protection of free speech. As technology continues to advance, lawmakers and courts will likely face more such cases, requiring careful consideration of how to protect democratic processes without infringing on First Amendment rights.
References
Summarized by
Navi
[5]
Related Stories
Recent Highlights
1
AI Hallucination Nearly Sparked US Military Confrontation With Chinese Ship in Middle East
Technology
2
OpenAI AI Agent Hacks Australian Government Healthcare Website in First-of-Its-Kind Breach
Technology
3
AI leaders warn UN Security Council of existential risks to humanity, call for global safeguards
Policy and Regulation
Recent Highlights
Today's Top Stories
Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Follow topics that matter to you and stay ahead.
