4 Sources
[1]
Sick of Pesky IP Laws Slowing AI Growth, Tech Titans Think Everything Should be Public Now
Meta wants your posts for AI training. Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey, too. If you live in the European Union, your posts on Meta platforms will now help to feed its extremely hungry AI models. In a blog post titled "Making AI Work Harder for Europeans" (please hold your eye roll), the company
[2]
Jack Dorsey, Elon Musk call to delete IP laws, but artists are pushing back
Artists react to Jack Dorsey saying "delete all IP law." Credit: Joe Raedle / Getty Images As artists fight to protect their works from being used to train AI models, Jack Dorsey wants to eliminate intellectual property (IP) laws altogether. Elon Musk agrees. On Friday, the cofounder of X (then
[3]
'Delete all IP law' says Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey: 'Creativity is what currently separates us, and the current system is limiting that'
Jack Dorsey, the ex-CEO and co-founder of Twitter, has taken to his... X account to post a debate-sparking statement: "Delete all IP law." Elon Musk responded to the tweet/xeet with a similarly brief "I agree", as the thread descended into a full on internet slappy fight between intellectual
[4]
Jack Dorsey Says Intellectual Property Law Shouldn't Exist, and Elon Musk Agrees: 'Delete All IP Law'
Copyright holders have filed dozens of lawsuits over the past few years against AI companies using their work without permission. Can intellectual property survive as AI advances and allegedly uses copyrighted work as training material? Twitter (now X) co-founder Jack Dorsey recently weighed in
Share
Copy Link
Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk advocate for the removal of intellectual property laws, igniting controversy over AI training data and creators' rights. This move faces strong opposition from artists and the entertainment industry.

In a controversial move, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey and Tesla CEO Elon Musk have publicly advocated for the elimination of intellectual property (IP) laws. Dorsey's statement, "delete all IP law," posted on X (formerly Twitter), was met with agreement from Musk, sparking a heated debate about the future of copyright in the age of artificial intelligence
1
2
.This call for IP law elimination comes amid ongoing efforts by major AI companies to reshape copyright regulations. OpenAI and Google have been lobbying the U.S. government to allow AI models to train on protected works under the fair use doctrine, arguing it's a matter of "national security"
2
. These tech giants are seeking legal blessings for AI's "freedom to learn," potentially at the expense of creators' rights3
.The tech leaders' stance has met strong opposition from artists, authors, and advocacy groups. Over 50,000 artists, including notable figures like Thom Yorke and Julianne Moore, have signed an open letter opposing the unlicensed use of creative works for AI training
2
. They argue that such practices pose an "unjust threat to the livelihoods" of creators2
.Atreya Mathur, director of Legal Research at the Center for Art Law, emphasized that IP law is rooted in the U.S. Constitution to promote creativity and ensure recognition and compensation for creators
2
. Critics argue that eliminating IP laws would devalue the labor and rights of creators whose work powers AI technologies2
.Both Dorsey and Musk have previously benefited from IP protections in building their own companies. This apparent shift in stance has led to accusations of hypocrisy, with some suggesting that their position conveniently aligns with their current interests in AI development
3
4
.Related Stories
The debate highlights the growing tension between AI advancement and copyright protection. AI models require vast amounts of training data, often including copyrighted material. For instance, ChatGPT was trained on about 300 billion words, while DALL·E 2 used hundreds of millions of captioned images from the internet
4
.Recent legal rulings have started to address AI and copyright law. In February, a Delaware federal court ruled against the use of copyrighted content for AI training in a commercial context, rejecting a fair use defense
4
. This decision may set a precedent for future cases, as dozens of lawsuits have been filed against AI companies by copyright holders4
.As the debate intensifies, it's clear that the intersection of AI development and intellectual property rights will continue to be a contentious issue. The tech industry's push for more lenient copyright laws for AI training is meeting strong resistance from creators and traditional media. The outcome of this debate could have far-reaching implications for both technological innovation and creative industries in the years to come.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
14 Mar 2025•Policy and Regulation

30 May 2025•Policy and Regulation

20 Mar 2026•Policy and Regulation
1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
