2 Sources
[1]
Local governments are using AI without clear rules or policies, and the public has no idea
Arizona State University provides funding as a member of The Conversation US. In 2017, the city of Rotterdam in the Netherlands deployed an artificial intelligence (AI) system to determine how likely welfare recipients were to commit fraud. After analysing the data, the system developed biases: it
[2]
Local governments are using AI without clear rules or policies, and the public has no idea
by Tan Yigitcanlar, Juan Manuel Corchado Rodriguez, Karen Mossberger, Pauline Hope Cheong and Rita Yi Man Li, The Conversation In 2017, the city of Rotterdam in the Netherlands deployed an artificial intelligence (AI) system to determine how likely welfare recipients were to commit fraud. After
Share
Copy Link
A study of 170 local governments worldwide reveals widespread AI adoption in public services without proper oversight, leading to potential ethical violations and public unawareness.

A recent study of 170 local governments worldwide has uncovered a concerning trend: the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) systems without clear policies or public awareness. This investigation, conducted by a team of researchers, revealed 262 cases of AI adoption across various domains of public service delivery
1
.The study found AI applications affecting local governance in five key areas:
Administrative services: For example, Madrid's VisitMadridGPT tourism chatbot provides personalized recommendations and real-time support
1
.Healthcare and wellbeing: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Boston launched an AI-driven chatbot for contactless food delivery
2
.Transportation and urban planning: Logan City in Australia implemented an AI system for real-time parking information
1
.Environmental management: Hangzhou, China, uses AI to classify waste more efficiently
2
.Public safety and law enforcement: Chicago has used AI to shape law enforcement strategies, reportedly reducing gun violence by 25% in 2018
1
.Despite the widespread adoption, the study found that only 26 out of 170 local governments (less than 16%) had published AI policies as of May 2023
2
. This lack of oversight raises serious concerns about potential ethical violations, systemic biases, and unregulated data use.The city of Rotterdam's experience with an AI system for detecting welfare fraud serves as a stark warning. Deployed in 2017, the system developed biases, flagging as "high risk" individuals who were female, young, had children, or had low Dutch language proficiency. The system was suspended in 2021 following an external ethics review
1
.Related Stories
A survey conducted in Australia, Spain, and the US revealed a significant disconnect between public awareness and local government AI initiatives:
2
.To address these challenges, the researchers emphasize the need for:
The research team is currently working with local governments in Australia, the US, Spain, Hong Kong, and Saudi Arabia to develop guiding AI principles, with the aim of finalizing them by the end of 2025
1
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
08 Feb 2025
16 Jan 2026•Business and Economy

30 Jun 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Science and Research

2
Technology

3
Technology
