3 Sources
[1]
Are tech billionaires hijacking our future? This Nobel laureate warns of Big Tech's stranglehold on AI and democracy
Should our future by decided by the bosses of big tech firms? For Nobel economics prize winner Simon Johnson, giving too much power to a handful of billionaires will come at the expense of public interest. The British-American economist who teaches at MIT also stressed that the development of
[2]
Don't let tech gurus decide the future: Nobel winner Simon Johnson
Should our future by decided by the bosses of big tech firms? For Nobel economics prize winner Simon Johnson, giving too much power to a handful of billionaires will come at the expense of public interest. The British-American economist who teaches at MIT also stressed that the development of
[3]
Don't let tech gurus decide the future: Nobel winner Simon Johnson
Paris (AFP) - Should our future by decided by the bosses of big tech firms? For Nobel economics prize winner Simon Johnson, giving too much power to a handful of billionaires will come at the expense of public interest. The British-American economist who teaches at MIT also stressed that the
Share
Copy Link
Nobel economics prize winner Simon Johnson cautions against allowing tech billionaires to shape the future of AI, emphasizing the need for regulation and a focus on benefiting less-skilled workers.

Simon Johnson, a British-American economist and recent Nobel economics prize winner, has raised concerns about the growing influence of tech billionaires in shaping the future of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on society. Johnson, who teaches at MIT, argues that concentrating too much power in the hands of a few tech leaders could come at the expense of public interest
1
.Johnson, along with his colleagues Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson, won the Nobel Prize for their work on the relationship between democracy and economic prosperity. A key focus of Johnson's research is the impact of automation on jobs. He questions whether AI will genuinely improve the productivity and wages of low-skilled workers or lead to what he terms "excessive automation," where human workers are replaced by machines
2
.According to Johnson, AI currently benefits big tech companies disproportionately. He cautions against allowing a small group of tech visionaries to dominate the development and application of AI technologies. Johnson states, "Don't let the big tech gurus dominate what gets developed and how it's used and how it impacts jobs... You will get their vision of the future. And for their wealth, not for you, not for your people, not for your community"
3
.Johnson advocates for increased regulation of Big Tech companies, particularly targeting their digital advertising-driven business models. He compares digital advertising to tobacco and junk food, arguing that it manipulates emotions, harms mental health, and undermines democracy. Johnson and Acemoglu propose a high tax on digital advertising, which they estimate could generate around $200 billion in additional revenue for the United States
1
.Related Stories
The economist also addresses the rise of populist movements in Western nations, attributing it to a failure to deliver economic progress to all segments of society. Johnson emphasizes the need to create more high-quality jobs with better pay and working conditions to address growing frustration and disappointment with democratic systems
2
.To counter these challenges, Johnson suggests using the proposed digital advertising tax revenue to fund mental health initiatives, including children's mental health programs. He also advocates for pushing tech companies to change their business models and rely less on digital advertising. Johnson believes these steps are crucial for improving democracy and finding common ground in increasingly polarized societies
3
.Summarized by
Navi
11 Sept 2026•Policy and Regulation

12 Nov 2025•Policy and Regulation

11 Sept 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
