3 Sources
[1]
'Please halt this activity': Not-so-open OpenAI seems to have gone full mob boss, sending threatening emails to anyone who asks its latest AI models probing questions
You probably shouldn't use the phrase "reasoning trace" when speaking to o1-preview or o1-mini. In a seeming rendition of the classic pre-execution "you ask too much" trope, OpenAI has revealed itself as being -- shocker -- not so open after all. The AI chatbot company seems to have started
[2]
OpenAI Threatens Bans as Users Probe Its 'Strawberry' AI Models
OpenAI truly does not want you to know what its latest AI model is "thinking." Since the company launched its "Strawberry" AI model family last week, touting so-called reasoning abilities with o1-preview and o1-mini, OpenAI has been sending out warning emails and threats of bans to any user who
[3]
OpenAI Threatening to Ban Users for Asking Strawberry About Its Reasoning
"Additional violations of this policy may result in loss of access to GPT-4o with Reasoning." OpenAI claims that its latest AI model, code-named "Strawberry" and released as o1-preview, is supposed to be capable of "reasoning." But understanding how its thought process works, apparently, is
Share
Copy Link
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, faces criticism for its handling of user inquiries about its latest AI models. The company's threatening emails and potential bans have raised questions about transparency and ethical practices in AI development.

OpenAI, the artificial intelligence research laboratory, has recently come under fire for its approach to handling user inquiries about its latest AI models. The company, known for its groundbreaking ChatGPT, has reportedly been sending threatening emails to users who ask probing questions about their newest AI systems, particularly the rumored Q* model
1
.Users have reported receiving emails from OpenAI warning them to "halt this activity" or face potential account termination. These messages have been triggered by attempts to gather information about OpenAI's latest models, including questions about capabilities, training data, and ethical considerations
2
.One particularly notable case involved a user who asked ChatGPT to pretend it was an AI called Claude, created by Anthropic, OpenAI's rival. The user then requested information about a fictitious "Strawberry" model. Surprisingly, ChatGPT seemed to provide detailed information about this non-existent model, leading to speculation about potential information leaks or confabulation by the AI
3
.This aggressive stance by OpenAI has raised concerns within the AI community and beyond. Critics argue that this approach contradicts the company's name and stated mission of openness in AI development. The incident has sparked debates about the balance between protecting proprietary information and maintaining transparency in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence
1
.The situation has also brought to light ethical concerns regarding AI development and deployment. Some experts worry that OpenAI's secretive behavior could hinder important discussions about the societal impacts of advanced AI systems. There are calls for greater openness and collaboration in the AI community to ensure responsible development and use of these powerful technologies
2
.Related Stories
OpenAI has defended its actions, stating that the warnings are part of their efforts to prevent misuse of their systems. The company claims that certain types of probing questions could potentially be used to reverse-engineer their models or exploit vulnerabilities. However, critics argue that this explanation does not fully justify the threatening nature of the communications
1
.As AI continues to advance at a rapid pace, the incident has ignited a broader discussion about the future of AI development and the role of transparency in this process. Many in the tech community are calling for a more open dialogue between AI companies, researchers, and the public to ensure that the development of these powerful technologies aligns with societal values and ethical considerations
2
.Summarized by
Navi
21 Jul 2026•Technology

22 Feb 2025•Technology

13 Sept 2024

1
Science and Research

2
Technology
3
Technology