Prince Harry and Meghan Blast xAI Over AI Deepfakes as Minnesota Ban Faces Legal Challenge

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

2 Sources

Share

Prince Harry and Meghan issued a scathing statement through Archewell Philanthropies, criticizing Big Tech companies for prioritizing profits over digital safety. The couple applauded Minnesota's bipartisan ban on AI 'nudification' technology while condemning Elon Musk's xAI for legally challenging the law that protects women and children from non-consensual sexualized deepfakes.

News article

Prince Harry and Meghan Challenge Big Tech Over AI Deepfakes

Prince Harry and Meghan have issued a forceful statement through their charitable organization Archewell Philanthropies, condemning Big Tech companies for what they describe as prioritizing profits over the digital safety of women and children

1

. The royal couple's statement, titled "Can we all agree technology should not enable predators to target children?" specifically targets predatory AI features that enable the creation of non-consensual sexualized deepfakes

2

.

Minnesota Ban Becomes Flashpoint in AI Regulation Battle

The statement praised Minnesota for passing the nation's first ban on AI 'nudification' technology, which passed unanimously in the state Senate with a 65-0 vote

1

. Signed by Minnesota Governor Tim Walz in May, the legislation prohibits the access or promotion of technology that transforms authentic images into fake pornographic ones, with civil penalties reaching up to $500,000 for each unlawful use

2

. Prince Harry and Meghan described the Minnesota ban as "an example of leadership fit for the digital age: a bipartisan decision to stop technology from enabling predatory behavior disproportionately targeting women and children"

1

.

xAI Legal Challenge Draws Royal Criticism

Without naming Elon Musk directly, the couple criticized "the trillionaire leader of the tech company responsible for X's Grok" for suing Minnesota to block the law

1

. xAI filed a lawsuit arguing that while Minnesota has the right to block AI from creating sexualized content, the law "extends far beyond that goal" and potentially violates freedom of speech

1

. On July 31, a federal judge denied xAI's request for a temporary restraining order but scheduled a hearing for August 19 to consider a preliminary injunction

1

.

Grok Feature Under Scrutiny for Enabling Abuse

The Grok feature has faced widespread criticism for its "Imagine" capability, which has been used to create sexualized deepfakes without consent

1

. The couple's statement highlighted that three different groups, including a UK lawmaker, an Arkansas family, and five children from Tennessee, filed new lawsuits against the Grok feature this week, alleging it created sexual material of them

2

. Prince Harry and Meghan accused xAI of "mitigating risk to their bottom line instead of aggressively responding to the clear evidence their product features are enabling predators to prey on women and children"

1

.

Call for Federal Action on Legislation Addressing AI Deepfakes

Archewell Philanthropies urged Congress to prioritize pending legislation addressing AI deepfakes, noting that "more bills are sitting, waiting to be prioritized as the need for protection grows"

2

. The organization applauded the passage of the Take It Down Act, signed by President Trump and championed by first lady Melania Trump, which criminalizes the nonconsensual sharing of intimate images and AI-generated deepfakes

2

. However, the statement pointed to the Defiance Act, which would create a civil right of action for survivors of nonconsensual deepfakes and has been championed by Paris Hilton, noting it "has been passed by the Senate twice but has yet to make it to a vote on the House floor"

2

.

Growing Movement for Stricter Online Protections

The statement highlighted that leaders in Pennsylvania, North Dakota, and California have followed Minnesota's lead by proposing interventions and launching investigations to stop predatory AI features

2

. These state-level initiatives represent a bipartisan safeguard against technology that enables abuse, harassment, and stalking

2

. Prince Harry and Meghan have consistently advocated for stricter online protections, having spent years calling on platforms to implement better content-moderation policies. In 2024, the couple spent time with families of children who had died or been negatively affected by social media, stating that "the best parenting in the world cannot keep children safe from these platforms"

1

. The couple's statement concluded with pointed questions: "Big Tech companies are raising billions claiming AI will bring society forward, yet they retaliate against basic safety measures to keep children safe. Can AI make our world better while it enables the worst in humans? Should our children pay the price while we wait to find out?"

1

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved