New York School Pauses AI Humanoid Robot 'Sally' After State and Union Pushback

9 Sources

Share

The Salamanca City Central School District in New York halted plans to deploy Sally, an AI-powered humanoid robot, after state education officials and teachers' unions raised concerns. The $57,590 robot from Realbotix sparked backlash over student data privacy, the company's ties to a sex doll manufacturer, and fears about replacing human educators with technology.

State Intervention Halts Humanoid Robot Deployment

The Salamanca City Central School District has paused its plan to deploy an AI-powered humanoid robot named Sally after New York State Education Commissioner Betty Rosa intervened with a formal letter expressing concern

1

2

. The district, located on the Seneca Nation reservation in rural western New York and serving roughly 1,300 students, had approved the nearly $60,000 purchase in June with plans to introduce Sally the robot into high school robotics courses this autumn

3

. Rosa's letter questioned the robot's role as a "tutoring platform" despite assurances it wouldn't deliver classroom instruction, while also highlighting concerns about student data privacy and the broader effect that a humanoid robot may have within a high-school classroom

2

.

Source: Futurism

Source: Futurism

The AI in education initiative was designed with input from student government members who helped shape Sally's appearance as a young female with dark hair, pale silicone skin, and an upbeat personality programmed to know local history including the Kinzua Dam

1

. Superintendent Mark Beehler defended the pilot program as essential preparation for living with technology rather than banning it, noting that "students will find a way around most rules that schools put in place"

2

5

.

Realbotix Connection Triggers Teachers' Unions Backlash

What transformed a modest pilot program into a statewide controversy was Realbotix's corporate lineage. The Toronto-based company acquired Simulcra in 2024, the parent company of RealDoll, which manufactures hyperrealistic sex dolls and companion robots

2

4

. Though Realbotix insists the two divisions share no staff, premises, or technology and is pursuing full separation by September, the association mobilized teachers' unions into action

2

. "A robot built by a company associated with sex dolls has no business in our classrooms," declared Melinda Person, president of New York State United Teachers

3

4

.

Source: NPR

Source: NPR

The company's $175,000 robotic companion Aria and its history of showing off male sex bots with robotic genitals in 2022 made it difficult to shake ethical concerns about bringing such technology into robot in high school classrooms . Realbotix responded by emphasizing that Sally was a "newly manufactured, purpose-built educational unit" with no modified hardware from its adult product lines

3

. The school district paid $57,590 for the robot and an accompanying AI teaching assistant, a discount from the $95,000 list price, as part of a package built around the WozEd curriculum from Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak

2

3

.

Privacy Concerns and Technology Overload in Education

Beyond the sex doll company controversy, the pilot program raised fundamental questions about student data privacy and the appropriate role of technology in learning environments

4

. Lacey Pihlblad, president of Salamanca Teachers' Association, expressed concern about "the security of the software that they're implementing, and whether or not the data will be stored, how it will be gathered, are the recording capabilities"

4

. The district stressed that Sally carries no facial recognition, keeps no recordings, and runs on a closed network with no internet access, with all information stored locally and consuming roughly the same energy as a laptop

3

2

.

The AI teaching assistant component would allow students to access an avatar on their laptops for homework help, feedback, and real-time translation in more than 100 languages, available virtually 24/7

2

4

. Yet this raised additional concerns as half of American parents already worry their children lean on AI too much, and New York state is currently shifting away from excessive technology in classrooms

2

4

.

Fears About Replacing Teachers and Cultural Insensitivity

Teachers' unions pushed back forcefully against what they perceived as a move to replace teachers with automation. "Our students don't need robots," Person stated. "They need real relationships with caring adults"

3

. Person characterized the initiative as leading to "the dehumanization of the profession of education," arguing that "putting a lifeless machine in front of students is a bad idea" for young people still learning interpersonal skills

4

. Beehler countered that "there is no possible way a robot can replace a human in a school" and stressed that "teaching is a human-to-human process"

3

.

Source: New York Post

Source: New York Post

Local residents also criticized the selection of a New York school with nearly 40% Native American enrollment as a testing ground for experimental technology

4

. "Out of all the schools in New York state, let alone in the US, they chose to experiment on Native American children yet again," said Sierra May Abrams, a substitute teacher and local resident, referencing the traumatic legacy of Native American boarding schools

4

. The Salamanca City Central School District now says it will use the pause to work through enhanced student data privacy agreements with state officials and continue community outreach before deciding whether to proceed

2

3

. Realbotix CEO Andrew Kiguel stated the company wants the program to be "demonstrably safe, fully district-approved, and strongly supported by teachers"

2

.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved