Study Reveals Extensive 24/7 Student Monitoring by School-Based Online Surveillance Companies

Extensive Student Monitoring Unveiled by UC San Diego Study

A groundbreaking study conducted by researchers at the University of California San Diego has shed light on the extensive monitoring practices of school-based online surveillance companies. The research, published on July 8, 2025, in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, provides the first detailed assessment of companies offering surveillance services to middle and high schools 1

1

2

Source: Newswise

Scope and Methodology

The study, led by Professor Cinnamon S. Bloss and first author Alison O'Daffer, identified 14 companies actively marketing online surveillance services to schools. These services include social media monitoring, student communications monitoring, and online activity monitoring, often extending beyond school-issued devices and outside of school premises 1

1

Key Findings

The research uncovered several concerning trends in the practices of these surveillance companies:

1. 24/7 Monitoring: A staggering 86% of the companies monitor students around the clock, seven days a week, not limiting their surveillance to school hours 1

   1

   .

2. AI-Driven Flagging: 71% of the companies employ artificial intelligence for automated flagging of "concerning activity." However, only 43% utilize human review teams, raising questions about the accuracy and context of flagged content 1

   1

   .

3. Device Coverage: While 93% of companies monitor school-issued devices, 36% claim to also monitor student-owned phones and computers. The extent of monitoring on personal devices remains unclear 1

   1

   .

Source: Tech Xplore

4. Risk Scoring: 29% of the companies generate "risk scores" for students based on their online behavior, viewable at various levels including individual student, classroom, or school-wide 1

   1

   .

Privacy and Transparency Concerns

The study highlights significant privacy and transparency issues:

• Companies use various methods to access student digital activity, including browser plug-ins, API integrations, and device software 1

  1

  2

  2

  .
• Sensitive data, including private messages and search histories, are collected and flagged by many companies 1

  1

  2

  2

  .
• Most companies provide little to no public information about their algorithms, potential error rates, or bias mitigation strategies 1

  1

  2

  2

  .

Related Stories

AI Surveillance in Schools: Balancing Student Safety and Privacy Concerns

AI Surveillance in Schools: Protecting Students or Criminalizing Careless Words?

Study Reveals Social Media's Impact on Youth: Declining Attention Spans and Addiction-Like Behaviors

Google Search AI labeled unsafe for kids as Common Sense Media report reveals alarming failures

Implications and Future Research

While these surveillance services were originally intended to support students' mental health and prevent adverse events like school shootings, the study raises important questions about privacy, equity, and oversight 1

1

2

The researchers suggest that further investigation is needed to understand:

1. The prevalence of monitoring adoption across U.S. schools.
2. How teachers and school administrators respond to alerts provided by the monitoring systems 1

   1

   2

   2

   .

Funding and Implementation

Schools either pay for these surveillance services directly or may request federal grant funding to cover the costs. Some companies provide additional features such as dashboards for administrators, after-hours alert systems, and even direct crisis intervention, including contacting law enforcement 1

1

2

As this technology continues to evolve and become more prevalent in educational settings, it is crucial to balance the potential benefits with the significant privacy and ethical concerns raised by this comprehensive study.