3 Sources
[1]
Ukraine to pick AI models operated without provider control, official says
July 7 (Reuters) - Ukraine will favour AI systems it can run on its own servers, a senior ministry official said on Tuesday, as wartime Kyiv seeks to keep digital tools for government services, businesses and the military from depending on remote systems that providers can restrict or switch off. The approach favours self-hosted, or "on-premise," models that Ukraine can deploy on its own infrastructure, while limiting solutions that, by design, remain under the provider's control -- a category that includes Anthropic and OpenAI's main models. The policy was reinforced after the U.S. government ordered Anthropic to cut access to powerful models, echoing broader European sentiment, Roman Kyslyi, Chief AI Officer at Ukraine's Ministry of Digital Transformation, told Reuters. "It confirms that AI sovereignty isn't just a defensive talking point, it's a necessity," he said. Reuters reported on Tuesday, opens new tab that Chinese authorities are considering curbs on top AI models, which currently dominate the open-source market. Kyslyi said the decisive criterion is not about where the model is from. "If the vendor will provide it to run on our on-premise (infrastructure), there are no restrictions." "The model is essentially a commodity," Kyslyi said, adding that Ukraine would work with any provider whose technology could be deployed under Ukrainian control. Currently, Ukraine's AI assistant inside the Diia government app runs on Google's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab remote-only Gemini, accessed through servers within the European Union. Kyslyi said Google provided free tokens for it, meaning no budget spending. Still, Ukraine strips personal data before sending queries to Gemini because they "don't control those models," he said, describing Gemini as an "interim" solution. Ukraine is also developing its own model with Kyivstar (KYIV.O), opens new tab based on Google's Gemma, its open variant, due to be released in autumn and intended for use across government services, private enterprises and the military. Kyslyi said the ministry compared several open-source options before choosing Gemma, including Mistral models and OpenAI's GPT-OSS. Gemma and Mistral matched remote-only alternatives on many performance tests, he said. Reporting by Leo Marchandon and Gianluca Lo Nostro in Gdansk, Editing by William Maclean Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab * Suggested Topics: * Artificial Intelligence * Data Privacy Leo Marchandon Thomson Reuters Leo's stories appear regularly on the technology and media desk, with a particular focus on France, Ukraine, and Europe's tech build up. He has reported extensively on major players across media & entertainment, artificial intelligence, and digital regulations. A background in tech-related law, Leo started his journalism career in Bordeaux, where he covered the full spectrum of the technology beat, from AI and spacetech to payment systems and regulations. He is now based in Gdansk, covering business, tech and entertainment news across Europe with Reuters. Gianluca Lo Nostro Thomson Reuters Gianluca's stories appear regularly on the business and technology section, with a particular focus on France and its efforts to compete with global rivals. He has reported extensively on connectivity and the geopolitics behind it in the war in Ukraine. A background in international studies, Gianluca started his journalism career in Milan and has covered French general and political news with Reuters in Paris.
[2]
Ukraine to Pick AI Models Operated Without Provider Control, Official Says
By Leo Marchandon and Gianluca Lo Nostro July 7 (Reuters) - Ukraine will favour AI systems it can run on its own servers, a senior ministry official said on Tuesday, as wartime Kyiv seeks to keep digital tools for government services, businesses and the military from depending on remote systems that providers can restrict or switch off. The approach favours self-hosted, or "on-premise," models that Ukraine can deploy on its own infrastructure, while limiting solutions that, by design, remain under the provider's control -- a category that includes Anthropic and OpenAI's main models. The policy was reinforced after the U.S. government ordered Anthropic to cut access to powerful models, echoing broader European sentiment, Roman Kyslyi, Chief AI Officer at Ukraine's Ministry of Digital Transformation, told Reuters. "It confirms that AI sovereignty isn't just a defensive talking point, it's a necessity," he said. Reuters reported on Tuesday that Chinese authorities are considering curbs on top AI models, which currently dominate the open-source market. Kyslyi said the decisive criterion is not about where the model is from. "If the vendor will provide it to run on our on-premise (infrastructure), there are no restrictions." "The model is essentially a commodity," Kyslyi said, adding that Ukraine would work with any provider whose technology could be deployed under Ukrainian control. Currently, Ukraine's AI assistant inside the Diia government app runs on Google's remote-only Gemini, accessed through servers within the European Union. Kyslyi said Google provided free tokens for it, meaning no budget spending. Still, Ukraine strips personal data before sending queries to Gemini because they "don't control those models," he said, describing Gemini as an "interim" solution. Ukraine is also developing its own model with Kyivstar based on Google's Gemma, its open variant, due to be released in autumn and intended for use across government services, private enterprises and the military. Kyslyi said the ministry compared several open-source options before choosing Gemma, including Mistral models and OpenAI's GPT-OSS. Gemma and Mistral matched remote-only alternatives on many performance tests, he said. (Reporting by Leo Marchandon and Gianluca Lo Nostro in Gdansk, Editing by William Maclean)
[3]
Ukraine to pick AI models operated without provider control, official says
Ukraine will favor AI systems run on its own servers for government services. This approach seeks to avoid dependence on remote systems that providers can restrict. The policy was reinforced after the US government ordered Anthropic to cut access. Ukraine is developing its own model with Kyivstar based on Google's Gemma. This model will be intended for use across government, business, and military. Ukraine will favour AI systems it can run on its own servers, a senior ministry official said on Tuesday, as wartime Kyiv seeks to keep digital tools for government services, businesses and the military from depending on remote systems that providers can restrict or switch off. The approach favours self-hosted, or "on-premise," models that Ukraine can deploy on its own infrastructure, while limiting solutions that, by design, remain under the provider's control - a category that includes Anthropic and OpenAI's main models. The policy was reinforced after the U.S. government ordered Anthropic to cut access to powerful models, echoing broader European sentiment, Roman Kyslyi, Chief AI Officer at Ukraine's Ministry of Digital Transformation, told Reuters. "It confirms that AI sovereignty isn't just a defensive talking point, it's a necessity," he said. Reuters reported on Tuesday that Chinese authorities are considering curbs on top AI models, which currently dominate the open-source market. Kyslyi said the decisive criterion is not about where the model is from. "If the vendor will provide it to run on our on-premise (infrastructure), there are no restrictions." "The model is essentially a commodity," Kyslyi said, adding that Ukraine would work with any provider whose technology could be deployed under Ukrainian control. Currently, Ukraine's AI assistant inside the Diia government app runs on Google's remote-only Gemini, accessed through servers within the European Union. Kyslyi said Google provided free tokens for it, meaning no budget spending. Still, Ukraine strips personal data before sending queries to Gemini because they "don't control those models," he said, describing Gemini as an "interim" solution. Ukraine is also developing its own model with Kyivstar based on Google's Gemma, its open variant, due to be released in autumn and intended for use across government services, private enterprises and the military. Kyslyi said the ministry compared several open-source options before choosing Gemma, including Mistral models and OpenAI's GPT-OSS. Gemma and Mistral matched remote-only alternatives on many performance tests, he said.
Share
Copy Link
Ukraine will prioritize AI systems it can run on its own servers, a senior official announced, as wartime Kyiv seeks independence from remote systems that providers can restrict. The policy shift follows U.S. government orders to Anthropic to cut access to powerful models, with Ukraine's Chief AI Officer calling AI sovereignty "a necessity, not just a defensive talking point."

Ukraine will favor self-hosted AI models that operate on its own servers, marking a strategic shift in the nation's approach to artificial intelligence deployment. Roman Kyslyi, Chief AI Officer at Ukraine's Ministry of Digital Transformation, confirmed the policy direction on Tuesday, emphasizing that wartime Kyiv must maintain control over digital tools used across government services, businesses, and the military
1
. The approach limits reliance on remote systems that providers can restrict or switch off, directly affecting AI models operated without provider control from companies like Anthropic and OpenAI whose main models remain under centralized control2
.The Ukraine AI policy was reinforced after the U.S. government ordered Anthropic to cut access to powerful models, a move that echoed broader European concerns about digital infrastructure dependency
3
. "It confirms that AI sovereignty isn't just a defensive talking point, it's a necessity," Kyslyi told Reuters. This statement reflects growing global tensions around AI access, with Reuters also reporting that Chinese authorities are considering curbs on top AI models that currently dominate the open-source AI models market1
. The decisive criterion for Ukraine is not geographic origin but operational control. "If the vendor will provide it to run on our on-premise infrastructure, there are no restrictions," Kyslyi explained, adding that "the model is essentially a commodity" that Ukraine would work with from any provider whose technology could be deployed under Ukrainian control2
.Ukraine's AI assistant inside the Diia government app currently runs on Google's remote-only Gemini model, accessed through servers within the European Union. Google provided free tokens for the service, meaning no budget spending for Ukraine
1
. However, Ukraine strips personal data before sending queries to the Gemini model because "they don't control those models," with Kyslyi describing it as an "interim" solution3
. This temporary arrangement highlights the tension between immediate operational needs and long-term strategic goals around AI for government and military use.Related Stories
Ukraine is developing its own model in partnership with Kyivstar, based on Google's open-source Gemma, the open variant of Google's proprietary system. The on-premise model is due to be released in autumn and intended for use across government services, private enterprises, and the military
2
. Before selecting Gemma, the ministry compared several open-source options including Mistral models and OpenAI GPT-OSS. According to Kyslyi, both Gemma and Mistral models matched remote-only alternatives on many performance tests1
. This evaluation process demonstrates Ukraine's commitment to balancing performance requirements with sovereignty concerns, ensuring that self-hosted AI models can deliver comparable capabilities to centralized alternatives while maintaining operational independence.The shift in Ukraine AI policy reflects broader concerns about U.S. government restrictions and the vulnerability of nations dependent on external AI infrastructure. For countries watching geopolitical AI dynamics, Ukraine's approach offers a template for maintaining digital autonomy without completely rejecting foreign technology. The emphasis on deployment flexibility rather than origin suggests that open-source AI models may become increasingly attractive to governments seeking to balance innovation with control. As more nations confront similar questions about AI sovereignty, the market for self-hosted solutions and open-source alternatives could expand significantly, potentially reshaping how AI companies structure their offerings for government and military clients worldwide.
Summarized by
Navi
17 Jun 2026•Policy and Regulation

12 Mar 2026•Technology

26 Jun 2026•Technology

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
