YouTube Creators Face Backlash Over Controversial AI Partnership With Higgsfield

2 Sources

Share

Prominent filmmaking YouTube creators Matti Haapoja and Sam 'Kold' Kolder sparked intense backlash after posting videos promoting AI platform Higgsfield's Seedance 2.5 technology. Fans and fellow creators questioned the transparency of these partnerships, with critics arguing the unlabeled content undermined creator-audience trust while promoting generative AI tools trained on uncredited human-made content.

YouTube Creators Spark Controversy With AI Platform Promotion

Prominent filmmaking YouTube creators including Matti Haapoja and Sam 'Kold' Kolder have ignited significant backlash after posting videos demonstrating AI platform Higgsfield and its recently added Seedance 2.5 functionality. The videos, which pitch these technologies as the future of video production, were not labeled as ads despite appearing as sponsored content. Neither the YouTube creators nor Higgsfield responded to questions about whether these represented paid AI partnerships

1

.

The controversy intensified when other creators began sharing screenshots of partnership offers they had received from PR firms working on Higgsfield's behalf. This led fans to conclude that Higgsfield was strategically leveraging creators to boost its profile and garner goodwill from the public. The situation highlights growing concerns about creator accountability and transparency in influencer marketing, particularly when promoting emerging technologies like AI-powered video production tools

2

.

Creator Content Raises Questions About Transparency

Matti Haapoja's video functioned like an infomercial, explaining how Cully Hill Boys—Higgsfield's feature-length film starring AI-generated duplicates of YouTubers Mikyle 'N3on' Rafiq and Matt Kiatipis—was produced with prompts. He demonstrated Seedance 2.5's capabilities using AI-manipulated footage of himself placed in different sci-fi settings. Sam 'Kold' Kolder's video, titled "AI is replacing me," presented a fictionalized narrative blending real footage with distinctly uncanny AI-generated imagery. Both videos enthusiastically framed Higgsfield and generative AI tools as innovative technologies with potential to revolutionize the entertainment industry

1

.

Source: The Verge

Source: The Verge

The caption for Sam 'Kold' Kolder's video appeared to contain an affiliate link offering a 30 percent discount on an annual Higgsfield subscription, further suggesting a commercial relationship. This lack of transparency in creator-brand partnerships left portions of their audiences feeling alienated, particularly given the ethical implications of AI in creative production

1

.

Industry Voices Challenge AI Comparisons

On Threads, Matti Haapoja's video met with substantial pushback from fans and fellow creators. Marques Brownlee took particular issue with Haapoja likening generative AI to the Canon EOS 5D Mark II, an iconic DSLR known for making shooting in 1080p full HD more affordable for independent filmmakers. Marques Brownlee emphasized a critical distinction: unlike the 5D Mark II, which was a physical tool people still had to learn how to use, generative AI is "trained on real human-made material without any credit." This criticism underscores broader concerns about uncredited human-made content being used to train AI systems

1

.

Sam 'Kold' Kolder's YouTube comments section showed a more mixed response, with many viewers responding positively with comments like "absolute cinema!" and "amazing transitions!" However, for every few positive reactions, critics lamented that "AI defeated our king" and insisted that "no AI can replace creative artists." This divide reflects the broader tension around AI adoption in creative industries

1

.

Pattern Emerges in AI Platform Marketing Strategies

The backlash against Matti Haapoja and Sam 'Kold' Kolder represents part of a larger pattern where AI companies attempt to build credibility through creator partnerships. Cully Hill Boys, which debuted last week, received relatively muted responses compared to the promotional videos. When scrolling through posts that the film's cast shared, there was a mix of AI boosters cheering Higgsfield on and critics knocking the company for being a "slop purveyor." Notably, those criticisms were not primarily aimed at the film's cast, who gave Higgsfield rights to use their likenesses but were not as directly involved in production as traditional actors would be

1

.

This situation mirrors what happened earlier this month when OpenAI invited influencers to a luxury "Summer Club" retreat in New York. Though those content creators did not upload substantial videos showing off OpenAI's tools, their posts about the trip and receiving OpenAI-branded swag were sufficient to turn off their followers. The pattern suggests that audiences are increasingly sensitive to perceived endorsements of generative AI, particularly when transparency is lacking

1

.

Why This Matters for Creator-Audience Trust

What distinguishes the Matti Haapoja and Sam 'Kold' Kolder situations is how their posts came across as sponsored advertising intended to ingratiate their audiences with Higgsfield. Even though neither creator explicitly stated "you, too, should absolutely be using these products," that message seemed implicit. This represents a critical moment for creator accountability, as audiences increasingly expect transparency about commercial relationships, particularly involving controversial technologies

2

.

The controversy demonstrates what can happen when people with large social media followings involve themselves with products and companies that do not align with their audiences' values. By endorsing generative AI in particular, YouTube creators open themselves to becoming focal points for negative feelings about the technology. While companies like OpenAI and Higgsfield can afford to rub people the wrong way to some extent, individual creators risk damaging the creator-audience trust that forms the foundation of their influence and livelihood. Watch for how other prominent creators navigate AI partnerships moving forward, as this incident may establish new expectations for disclosure and alignment with audience values in the AI-powered video production space

1

.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved