3 Sources
[1]
99% of executives expect AI to trigger layoffs within two years, survey finds
Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. A hot potato: Still think the AI-driven jobs apocalypse has been overblown? A new report that interviewed almost 1,000 executives found that 99% expect AI to lead to layoffs in the short term. Moreover, most executives believe that redesigning work to incorporate AI and automation will drive the greatest returns, while just 32% say their workforce can optimally combine human and machine capabilities. Consulting firm Mercer's Global Talent Trends report covers several AI-related topics. The most depressing finding is that virtually every one of the 825 C-suite leaders who participated expects AI to lead to at least some headcount reduction in the next two years. It was recently reported that tech sector job losses in early 2026 have already surged past 100,000, with AI being a major factor in most cases. Unfortunately, this latest survey suggests we might not have seen the worst of it. Interestingly, the report also found that a depleted workforce, worries about AI-driven job displacement, and concerns over inequities in AI access have led to a collapse in the number of employees "thriving." The figure was at 66% in 2024 and has fallen to 44% in 2026. Also, 35% of employees would consider leaving their organization if they felt disadvantaged by unequal access to AI tools or training. This declining motivation is fueling a fall in productivity. Somewhat paradoxically, 63% of executives believe redesigning work around AI and automation will deliver the greatest returns. That optimism seems a little misplaced given a January survey that found more than half of CEOs who had adopted AI had not seen reduced costs or increased revenue as a result. When companies first started embedding AI more widely, executives constantly talked about the technology augmenting and helping humans, rather than replacing them. Today, firms such as Block and Meta are more candid about AI-related layoffs, something reflected in the survey: just over three out of 10 execs think their workforce can optimally combine human and machine capabilities. Another part of the survey looked at drivers influencing C-suite people plans. Digital acceleration, including AI, was the second-highest factor. Somewhat ironically, it sat behind talent scarcity - the top driver. Despite AI becoming increasingly widespread, sentiment toward the technology is not improving. Direct and indirect job losses keep growing, anger over new data centers is increasing, and AI-generated content in almost any medium is often met with public outcry.
[2]
99% of CEOs Expect AI-Driven Layoffs in the Next Two Years
Virtually all CEOs surveyed in a recent study said they expect corporate AI initiatives to lead to layoffs within the next two years. According to consulting firm Mercer's Global Talent Trends report, 99% of CEOs are prepared for AI-driven layoffs in the short term. The report says that most executives believe redesigning work to incorporate automation will drive the greatest return on investment, but only 32% said they believed the workforce can optimally combine both human and machine capabilities. The corporate world is eagerly adopting artificial intelligence as the next big profit maximizer. Over the past year, many companies, and increasingly those in Silicon Valley, have claimed that artificial intelligence initiatives are working so well that they can justify massive layoff decisions. But while executives and investors alike have been relatively open about their expectations for an AI-driven white-collar unemployment crisis in the near future, experts are conflicted over whether these commitments are resulting in meaningful productivity gains, while others are discarding AI's potential to disrupt the workforce merely as a strategic tactic used by the AI industry to sell its products. Taking the brunt of this are young workers. According to a recent survey by yet another consulting firm, most of the AI-driven headcount reduction that CEOs are bracing for is expected to focus on early-career positions. The reasoning for that, as it goes, is that AI is best at automating simpler tasks that an early-career worker would be expected to perform at a company as they get on-the-job training needed to mature into higher-level positions. But many executives, dazzled by the promise of an AI chatbot that can finish tasks in mere seconds and work 24/7 without needing so much as a bathroom break, have said to hell with early-career workers and training the future of the workforce. That impact is not hypothetical and has already landed, according to several studies published over the past year. The result has been the grimmest job market for 22-to-27-year-olds since the worst days of the pandemic, and hordes of young people overwhelmingly disillusioned about both AI and their futures. A recent study found that Gen Z's use of AI was plateauing, and members of the cohort increasingly report feeling anxious and angry over the technology. This AI skepticism has infected other age groups as well. An NBC News poll from March found that AI was so unpopular among voters that even Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE), the agency at the center of a crackdown which led to massive nationwide protests, was viewed relatively more positively. Setting aside the question of whether this trend of layoffs can actually be justified by AI's productivity gains, workers are impacted by how executives are espousing the technology at the expense of their workforce. According to Mercer's survey, only 44% of employees reported thriving at work in 2026, down from 66% in 2024, and anxiety over AI-driven job displacement is to blame. This existential distress and deep anxiety are prevalent enough among workers that researchers are proposing to coin the term "AI replacement dysfunction" or AIRD to describe it.
[3]
Vast majority of executives expect AI layoffs soon, survey says
Corporate leaders are still laser focused on AI. Credit: sdecoret / Shutterstock Corporate execs are prepped and ready to cut their workforces down due to AI in the next two years, according to a new corporate survey of the job market. Conducted by the Mercer consulting firm, the global report surveyed 12,000 respondents across upper-level management, human resources, and lower-level employees. Mashable 101 Fan Fave: Vote for your favorite creator today! More than 99 percent of executives surveyed for the report said they expect AI "to lead to at least some headcount reduction in the next two years." In addition, fully 98 percent of executives said they were "planning organization design changes in the next two years." And, when compared to other employees, C-Suite-level execs were much more focused on figuring out how to incorporate AI and automation. So far this year, Amazon, Atlassian, Block, Fiverr, Pinterest, and Snap have announced layoffs related to AI, and an estimated 50,000 AI layoffs occurred in 2025. Not every exec believes the shifting job market is cause for alarm. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon recently penned a New York Times opinion piece calling the "AI job apocalypse" overblown. "The United States has a long track record of creating new jobs in response to disruption," Solomon wrote. "The historical pattern is clear: The U.S. economy can and will adapt to major advances in technology." A recent study conducted by the Harvard Business School found that generative AI is actually increasing demand for jobs in "augmentation-prone" roles in the short term, and that workforce reductions are primarily hitting finance and tech sectors. But only a third of execs told the consulting firm they believe human and machine capabilities can be effectively combined in workforces at large. Employee satisfaction is still a concern, as well. Amid worsening workforce and economic anxiety, more than a third of employees said they would consider leaving their jobs if they felt disadvantaged when it came to AI, according to the trend report. According to a September Pew Research Center survey, 21 percent of Americans said their work is partially done with AI. While the larger majority of American workers (65 percent) still say AI hasn't encroached on their jobs, AI integration is increasingly affecting younger, early-career employees and college graduates.
Share
Copy Link
A Mercer survey of 825 C-suite leaders reveals 99% expect AI to trigger layoffs in the next two years, with 98% planning organizational design changes. Employee well-being has collapsed from 66% in 2024 to 44% in 2026 as AI-driven job displacement fears mount across industries.
A stark new executive survey from consulting firm Mercer reveals that 99% of C-suite leaders expect AI to trigger layoffs within the next two years
1
2
. The Global Talent Trends report, which surveyed 12,000 respondents including 825 C-suite executives across upper-level management, human resources, and employees, paints a sobering picture of the job market as companies accelerate their adoption of generative AI and automation3
. This overwhelming consensus among business leaders signals that AI layoffs are no longer a distant possibility but an imminent reality reshaping corporate strategy.
Source: Mashable
The findings arrive as tech sector job losses in early 2026 have already surged past 100,000, with AI cited as a major factor in most cases
1
. Companies including Amazon, Atlassian, Block, Fiverr, Pinterest, and Snap have announced AI-related layoffs, contributing to an estimated 50,000 AI-driven layoffs in the next two years across industries3
. The Mercer report indicates that 98% of executives are planning organizational design changes in the next two years, underscoring how deeply AI integration is influencing corporate restructuring3
.While 63% of executives expect AI to trigger layoffs believe that redesigning work around AI and automation will deliver the greatest returns, only 32% think their workforce can optimally combine human and machine capabilities
2
. This gap reveals a fundamental challenge: executives are betting heavily on AI despite limited confidence in their organizations' ability to integrate the technology effectively. The optimism about cost reductions and revenue increases may be misplaced, as a January survey found that more than half of CEOs who adopted AI had not seen reduced costs or increased revenue as a result1
.The corporate rhetoric around AI has shifted noticeably. Early promises that AI would augment and help humans rather than replace them have given way to more candid acknowledgments of headcount reductions. Firms such as Block and Meta now openly discuss AI-driven job displacement as part of their business strategy
1
. Yet experts remain conflicted over whether these commitments are resulting in meaningful productivity gains, with some suggesting AI's workforce disruption potential is merely a strategic tactic used by the AI industry to sell its products2
.The impact of AI-driven job displacement extends beyond those who lose their jobs. The Mercer survey found that employees "thriving" at work plummeted from 66% in 2024 to just 44% in 2026
1
2
. This dramatic decline in employee well-being stems from a depleted workforce, worries about AI-driven job displacement, and concerns over inequities in AI access. The anxiety has become so prevalent that researchers are proposing to coin the term "AI replacement dysfunction" or AIRD to describe the existential distress workers experience2
.Source: TechSpot
More than a third of employees—35%—would consider leaving their organization if they felt disadvantaged by unequal access to AI tools or training
1
3
. This declining motivation is fueling a fall in productivity, creating a paradox where the very technology meant to boost efficiency is undermining workforce engagement. Young workers are bearing the brunt, with AI automation targeting early-career positions that traditionally provided on-the-job training needed to mature into higher-level roles2
. The result has been the grimmest job market for 22-to-27-year-olds since the worst days of the pandemic2
.Related Stories
Not all executives share the same level of alarm. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon recently argued in a New York Times opinion piece that the "AI job apocalypse" is overblown, writing that "The United States has a long track record of creating new jobs in response to disruption"
3
. A Harvard Business School study found that generative AI is actually increasing demand for jobs in "augmentation-prone" roles in the short term, though workforce reductions are primarily hitting finance and tech sectors3
.According to a September Pew Research Center survey, 21% of Americans said their work is partially done with AI, while 65% of American workers still say AI hasn't encroached on their jobs
3
. However, AI integration is increasingly affecting younger, early-career employees and college graduates. A recent study found that Gen Z's use of AI was plateauing, with members of the cohort increasingly reporting feeling anxious and angry over the technology2
. An NBC News poll from March found AI was so unpopular among voters that even ICE was viewed relatively more positively2
.The Mercer report identified digital acceleration, including AI, as the second-highest driver influencing C-suite people plans. Ironically, it sat behind talent scarcity—the top driver
1
. This suggests executives are simultaneously struggling to find qualified workers while planning to reduce headcount through automation, a contradiction that may define the next phase of workforce transformation as companies navigate the uncertain terrain between technological capability and human capital needs.Summarized by
Navi
04 Mar 2026•Business and Economy

02 Apr 2026•Business and Economy

08 May 2026•Business and Economy

1
Startups

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
