99% of Executives Expect AI Layoffs Within Two Years as Worker Anxiety Surges

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

3 Sources

Share

A Mercer survey of 825 C-suite leaders reveals 99% expect AI to trigger layoffs in the next two years, with 98% planning organizational design changes. Employee well-being has collapsed from 66% in 2024 to 44% in 2026 as AI-driven job displacement fears mount across industries.

Nearly All Executives Anticipate AI-Driven Job Cuts

A stark new executive survey from consulting firm Mercer reveals that 99% of C-suite leaders expect AI to trigger layoffs within the next two years

1

2

. The Global Talent Trends report, which surveyed 12,000 respondents including 825 C-suite executives across upper-level management, human resources, and employees, paints a sobering picture of the job market as companies accelerate their adoption of generative AI and automation

3

. This overwhelming consensus among business leaders signals that AI layoffs are no longer a distant possibility but an imminent reality reshaping corporate strategy.

Source: Mashable

Source: Mashable

The findings arrive as tech sector job losses in early 2026 have already surged past 100,000, with AI cited as a major factor in most cases

1

. Companies including Amazon, Atlassian, Block, Fiverr, Pinterest, and Snap have announced AI-related layoffs, contributing to an estimated 50,000 AI-driven layoffs in the next two years across industries

3

. The Mercer report indicates that 98% of executives are planning organizational design changes in the next two years, underscoring how deeply AI integration is influencing corporate restructuring

3

.

The Disconnect Between AI Promises and Workforce Reality

While 63% of executives expect AI to trigger layoffs believe that redesigning work around AI and automation will deliver the greatest returns, only 32% think their workforce can optimally combine human and machine capabilities

2

. This gap reveals a fundamental challenge: executives are betting heavily on AI despite limited confidence in their organizations' ability to integrate the technology effectively. The optimism about cost reductions and revenue increases may be misplaced, as a January survey found that more than half of CEOs who adopted AI had not seen reduced costs or increased revenue as a result

1

.

The corporate rhetoric around AI has shifted noticeably. Early promises that AI would augment and help humans rather than replace them have given way to more candid acknowledgments of headcount reductions. Firms such as Block and Meta now openly discuss AI-driven job displacement as part of their business strategy

1

. Yet experts remain conflicted over whether these commitments are resulting in meaningful productivity gains, with some suggesting AI's workforce disruption potential is merely a strategic tactic used by the AI industry to sell its products

2

.

Decline in Employee Well-Being Accelerates

The impact of AI-driven job displacement extends beyond those who lose their jobs. The Mercer survey found that employees "thriving" at work plummeted from 66% in 2024 to just 44% in 2026

1

2

. This dramatic decline in employee well-being stems from a depleted workforce, worries about AI-driven job displacement, and concerns over inequities in AI access. The anxiety has become so prevalent that researchers are proposing to coin the term "AI replacement dysfunction" or AIRD to describe the existential distress workers experience

2

.

Source: TechSpot

Source: TechSpot

More than a third of employees—35%—would consider leaving their organization if they felt disadvantaged by unequal access to AI tools or training

1

3

. This declining motivation is fueling a fall in productivity, creating a paradox where the very technology meant to boost efficiency is undermining workforce engagement. Young workers are bearing the brunt, with AI automation targeting early-career positions that traditionally provided on-the-job training needed to mature into higher-level roles

2

. The result has been the grimmest job market for 22-to-27-year-olds since the worst days of the pandemic

2

.

Conflicting Views on AI's Economic Impact

Not all executives share the same level of alarm. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon recently argued in a New York Times opinion piece that the "AI job apocalypse" is overblown, writing that "The United States has a long track record of creating new jobs in response to disruption"

3

. A Harvard Business School study found that generative AI is actually increasing demand for jobs in "augmentation-prone" roles in the short term, though workforce reductions are primarily hitting finance and tech sectors

3

.

According to a September Pew Research Center survey, 21% of Americans said their work is partially done with AI, while 65% of American workers still say AI hasn't encroached on their jobs

3

. However, AI integration is increasingly affecting younger, early-career employees and college graduates. A recent study found that Gen Z's use of AI was plateauing, with members of the cohort increasingly reporting feeling anxious and angry over the technology

2

. An NBC News poll from March found AI was so unpopular among voters that even ICE was viewed relatively more positively

2

.

The Mercer report identified digital acceleration, including AI, as the second-highest driver influencing C-suite people plans. Ironically, it sat behind talent scarcity—the top driver

1

. This suggests executives are simultaneously struggling to find qualified workers while planning to reduce headcount through automation, a contradiction that may define the next phase of workforce transformation as companies navigate the uncertain terrain between technological capability and human capital needs.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved