2 Sources
[1]
AI is storming workplaces -- and barely making a difference, study says
Surely, the billions of dollars invested in AI chatbots will increase productivity and put economic performance into hyperdrive, right? Hold the phone, say researchers at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a think tank in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "Despite substantial investments [in
[2]
AI is not increasing productivity or leading to job losses, finds a study
A recent study indicates that AI's impact on employee pay and hours has been minimal, despite its rapid adoption. While some companies like CrowdStrike and Duolingo are cutting staff in favor of AI, others, such as Klarna, are bringing back human workers after AI failed to meet expectations in
Share
Copy Link
A recent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research challenges the hype surrounding AI's impact on workplace productivity, revealing minimal effects on earnings and work hours across various professions.

A recent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) has cast doubt on the widely-held belief that AI chatbots are revolutionizing workplace productivity. The research, conducted by economists Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard, reveals that despite substantial investments in AI technology, its economic impact remains minimal
1
.The study, titled "Large Language Models, Small Labor Market Effects," estimates that productivity gains from AI chatbots amount to a mere 3% in time savings. Surprisingly, the researchers found no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation, with confidence intervals ruling out effects larger than 1%
1
.The research, which collected data primarily from Denmark, a country with high AI adoption and detailed record-keeping, examined 7,000 workplaces across various fields, including law, journalism, bookkeeping, financial advice, and teaching
1
.The findings stand in stark contrast to the corporate hype surrounding AI's potential. Companies like Shopify and Duolingo have recently announced that managers would need to justify hiring humans instead of using AI. However, the NBER report suggests that much of this enthusiasm may be driven by corporate FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and a desire to keep up with competitors rather than tangible benefits
1
.While the study found that AI adoption has not led to massive layoffs, it also revealed that it hasn't delivered considerable financial advantages to either employers or employees. The time freed up by AI was often used for other work tasks, including fixing mistakes created by AI or developing measures to prevent AI-assisted cheating
1
.Related Stories
Despite the study's findings, some companies continue to replace workers with AI. Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike announced a 5% workforce reduction in favor of AI, while Duolingo plans to gradually stop using contractors for work that AI can handle
2
.Conversely, Swedish fintech company Klarna is preparing to bring back more human workers after heavily relying on AI for customer service tasks. The company admitted that AI customer agents could not match the quality of service delivered by humans, highlighting the limitations of current AI technology in certain roles
2
.Nobel prize winner Daron Acemoglu predicts that AI adoption will increase the U.S. GDP by only 1.6% in the next decade, with productivity increasing by a mere 0.05%. He suggests that the current hype is leading to poor investment decisions, with too much focus on automation and not enough on providing expertise and information to workers
1
.As the debate on AI's impact on the workplace continues, this study provides valuable insights into the current state of AI adoption and its effects on productivity and employment. It underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of AI's potential and limitations in various professional contexts.
Summarized by
Navi
30 Apr 2025•Business and Economy

18 Feb 2026•Business and Economy

01 Oct 2025•Business and Economy

1
Science and Research

2
Technology

3
Technology
