Apple Alleges Former Engineer Used Stolen Trade Secrets to Train AI Agents at OpenAI

5 Sources

Share

Apple submitted new forensic evidence in its trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI, claiming former engineer Chang Liu accessed a proprietary circuit schematic and used it to train AI agents. The evidence, found on a MacBook Liu used after joining OpenAI, also suggests attempts to destroy evidence after Apple's internal investigation began.

Apple Presents Forensic Evidence in Trade Secret Case

Apple filed new evidence on August 31 in its ongoing trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI, revealing what it calls "shocking evidence" from forensic analysis of a MacBook used by former Apple engineer Chang Liu

1

3

. The filing supports Apple's push for expedited discovery in federal court, alleging that Liu not only accessed proprietary Apple files but actively used them in his work at the AI company.

According to court documents, Apple received the MacBook from OpenAI on August 21 as part of legal proceedings

1

5

. Initial forensic inspection uncovered four key allegations: Liu downloaded and used a confidential Apple circuit schematic in his OpenAI work, he and other OpenAI employees were aware of his unauthorized access to Apple's third-party cloud storage, he instructed a colleague to destroy evidence after learning of Apple's investigation, and he used tools with names identical to proprietary internal engineering tools used at Apple

3

4

.

Former Apple Engineer Allegedly Trained AI Agent with Proprietary Files

Chang Liu, who served as a senior system electrical engineer at Apple before joining OpenAI in January, allegedly exploited his access to download dozens of confidential Apple files, including a power converter circuit schematic

2

4

. Apple claims Liu accessed this circuit schematic in March 2026, two months after leaving the company, and used it to run simulations in LTspice, an electrical engineering tool

3

4

.

The former Apple engineer reportedly told OpenAI colleagues that his AI agent learned to run LTspice and review simulation results for power conversion development work

3

4

. Apple argues this represents a particularly dangerous form of misuse of proprietary information, stating that when trade secret information is fed into an AI agent or model that learns from it, that learning "may create irreversible and continually propagating uses of the trade secret"

3

.

Source: 9to5Mac

Source: 9to5Mac

Evidence Destruction Allegations Intensify Legal Dispute

Apple's filing alleges that upon learning he was the subject of an internal investigation, Liu directed an OpenAI coworker to "restore" any Apple-issued devices, which Apple interprets as an attempt to erase forensic evidence

2

3

. The colleague reportedly confirmed she would comply with these instructions

3

4

. Apple conducted the simulation work on a Mac mini that synced to the MacBook he retained from Apple, and the company now seeks to investigate that device as well

4

.

The tech giant emphasized that defendants chose not to inspect the laptop before advancing theories that the device's data now disproves

3

. Apple argues this forensic evidence demonstrates it is not conducting "fishing expeditions" but that its stolen trade secrets are being actively used and evidence is being destroyed

3

.

OpenAI Denies Wrongdoing as Apple Pushes for Expedited Discovery

Apple first filed the lawsuit in July against OpenAI employees Chang Liu and Tang Tan, accusing them of using multiple methods to steal data

3

. The company requested expedited discovery earlier in August, expanding the scope of its claims to include 11 former employees allegedly involved in sharing stolen trade secrets with OpenAI

2

. Apple is now asking the federal court to expedite discovery proceedings, including early document production and depositions of key OpenAI employees and executives

3

4

.

Source: MacRumors

Source: MacRumors

OpenAI has responded by seeking dismissal of the Apple OpenAI lawsuit, stating it is building products that are "entirely new"

1

5

. The AI company called Apple's charges "careless, aggressive and oddly personal" and has denied any wrongdoing

2

. OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the new forensic evidence

1

5

.

Implications for AI Development Practices and Intellectual Property

This legal dispute raises critical questions about AI development practices and the protection of intellectual property in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence industry. The case highlights concerns about how proprietary engineering tools and circuit schematics from one company might be incorporated into AI training processes at competing firms. Apple's argument that AI agents trained on stolen trade secrets could create "irreversible and continually propagating" uses of that information represents a novel challenge in intellectual property law.

The outcome of this case could establish important precedents for how courts handle trade secret violations involving AI systems. Industry observers should watch whether Apple succeeds in obtaining expedited discovery and whether the forensic evidence from the MacBook proves sufficient to demonstrate active misuse of proprietary Apple files. The case also underscores the importance of robust security protocols when employees transition between competing technology companies, particularly in sensitive engineering and AI development roles.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved