arXiv Caps Submissions at 2 Per Month as AI-Generated Papers Flood Preprint Repository

The 1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

has implemented an 2

2

2

2

capping authors at two submissions per calendar month, with a maximum of three active submissions at any time. The measure, effective October 1st, 2026, responds to an unprecedented 1

1

1

1

driven largely by 2

2

2

2

that make paper production faster but often sacrifice quality.

Submission Volume Quadruples in a Decade

The numbers tell a stark story. In September 2026, 2

2

2

2

received 40,363 submissions—a 309 percent increase from the 9,869 submissions received in September 2016. More alarmingly, submissions have doubled in just the past two years, jumping from 20,569 in September 2024. This explosive growth generated nearly 9,000 support tickets for arXiv staff and 1

1

1

1

in September alone, straining the volunteer-based moderation system that has long been the backbone of the 2

2

2

2

repository.

AI Slop Overwhelms Volunteer Moderators

The flood of 1

1

1

1

has created what many are calling 1

1

1

1

—papers that fail to meet basic scholarly standards. 2

2

2

2

report seeing an uptick in "thin papers of narrow scope" and "salami papers," where authors split a single work into multiple smaller submissions. Dense, 2

2

2

2

that lack substance have become increasingly common. "A relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators' time," explained arXiv editorial advisory council chair Thomas Dietterich in 1

1

1

1

. "This is unfair to authors who continue to submit quality papers—their papers can be delayed for days or weeks as a result."

Rate Limit Policy Aims for Fair Moderation

The new 2

2

2

2

replaces the previous "practical limit" that gave 1

1

1

1

discretion to determine excessive submissions. Before AI tools became widespread, there was an easily discernible ceiling to how many papers an individual could produce. That ceiling no longer exists. The 2

2

2

2

apply uniformly across all submitters and categories, counting rejected papers toward the monthly total. However, papers with multiple authors only count toward the submission rate of the individual who files them, meaning large institutional projects with multiple researchers should see minimal impact.

Temporary Measure While Best Practices Evolve

ArXiv community engagement manager Kat Boboris characterized the policy as a 1

1

1

1

—a stopgap while the organization determines new best practices for submissions in an AI-assisted research environment. The separate limit of three active submissions has been in place since 2024. ArXiv policy permits 2

2

2

2

when significant use of generative AI tools is disclosed, when those tools support research rather than replace it, and when the resulting work meets standards for scholarly interest and advances the field. Many recent submissions fail these requirements.

What This Means for Academic Publishing

The policy update signals a broader reckoning for academic publishing as 2

2

2

2

fundamentally alter research workflows. ArXiv, which became an independent nonprofit over the summer after 25 years under Cornell University's stewardship, now faces the challenge of maintaining 2

2

2

2

and 2

2

2

2

while adapting to technological change. The organization is asking researchers to "prioritize their submissions and consider submitting papers that reflect the full scope of their work rather than multiple incremental papers." ArXiv will monitor the policy's impact on submission rates and moderation load, making further changes as needed. For researchers dealing with 2

2

2

2

or conference deadlines, the new limits may require strategic planning about which work to submit and when. The policy aims to distribute 2

2

2

2

more fairly while protecting the integrity of the arXiv corpus—a balancing act that will define how open-access repositories navigate the AI era.