arXiv Bans Researchers for One Year Over Unchecked AI-Generated Content and Hallucinated References

Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban

The physical-sciences repository arXiv is banning researchers from posting their manuscripts on the platform for one year if a submission is found to contain references that have been hallucinated by artificial-intelligence tools. The ban also applies to authors who submit manuscripts containing

Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work | TechCrunch

ArXiv, a widely used open repository for preprint research, is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers. Although papers are posted to the site before they are peer-reviewed, arXiv (pronounced "archive") has become one of the main ways that

ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slop

Last year, ArXiv also updated its policies to reduce AI slop by only allowing computer science review articles and position papers to be published if they have been peer reviewed and have been accepted at a conference or a journal. "The advent of large language models have made this type of content

Major Scientific Repository arXiv Cracks Down on AI-Generated Papers

If the platform finds 'incontrovertible evidence' that a submission's large language model (LLM) used wasn't checked, they could face a one-year ban, as well as long-term scrutiny of what they submit. ArXiv.org, one of the world's most popular repositories of free scientific research, has cracked

A key science publishing platform is cracking down on AI slop

The pre-print website arXiv has announced that researchers who put their names to papers which included errors clearly generated by artificial intelligence (AI) will face a year-long ban and ongoing restrictions. The move is a response to a growing influx of AI-generated papers faced by scholarly

ArXiv will ban researchers for a year if they submit papers with AI slop

Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. Science Slop: Large language models and chatbots are growing in popularity for both recreational use and, in some cases, serious research projects. However, one of the internet's most popular

ArXiv introduces one-year ban for researchers who submit papers with unchecked AI-generated content

ArXiv, the open-access repository that has served as the primary distribution channel for preprint research in computer science, mathematics, and physics for more than three decades, will ban authors for one year if they submit papers containing obvious signs of unchecked AI generation. Thomas

ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science. ArXiv, the open-access repository of preprint academic research, will ban authors of papers for a year if they submit obviously AI-generated work. Late Thursday evening,

A popular academic journal is coming down hard on AI-generated submissions

We're still in the early stages of the AI revolution, but there's already plenty of evidence that it won't be purely a blessing. Generative AI has made writing exponentially faster, if not necessarily better, and the result has been a massive increase in submissions of novels, newspaper pieces, and

ArXiv Warns Researchers Against Submitting Papers With Unchecked AI Content

ArXiv has moved to tighten its rules on careless use of large language models in research papers. The open-access preprint platform said authors must check all content before submitting work, even when they during writing or research. The policy does not block researchers from using large language