Chicago Law School bans phones and laptops for first-years to combat AI reliance

3 Sources

Share

The University of Chicago Law School unveiled one of the most restrictive AI policies among U.S. law schools, banning first-year law students from using phones and laptops in required classes. Dean Adam Chilton says the move aims to develop essential human skills and critical thinking before students learn AI tools, acknowledging that legal employers expect graduates to use the technology responsibly.

University of Chicago Law School Implements Sweeping Device Ban

The University of Chicago Law School has introduced what appears to be among the most restrictive AI policies adopted by any U.S. law school, barring incoming first-year law students from using phones and laptops in all required courses starting this academic year

1

. The phones and laptops ban represents a dramatic shift in legal education as institutions grapple with artificial intelligence's rapid integration into both academia and the legal profession

2

.

Source: CBS

Source: CBS

Dean Adam Chilton told Reuters he was unaware of any other law school implementing a blanket first-year laptop and phone ban of this scope. The policy affects core courses including constitutional law, torts, and property, where students will be required to take handwritten notes or rely on designated classroom scribes who use electronic devices to create shared notes for the entire class

1

.

Three-Pronged AI Strategy Targets Critical Thinking

The University of Chicago Law School spent the past year developing a comprehensive AI strategy after consulting with alumni, law firm leaders, business leaders, legal technology executives, and their own faculty and students

3

. The resulting approach focuses on three core objectives: developing AI-resilient pedagogy and assessment, elevating essential human skills that distinguish excellent lawyers, and teaching responsible AI use.

"The feedback we have received throughout this process has been consistent," the school stated. "We need to ensure that our students actually learn to think critically, strategically, and independently without relying on AI; but we also must face the reality that AI tools are already widely available to our students, and our graduates will be expected to be prepared to use them in legal practice"

2

.

Chilton emphasized the importance of preparing students for real-world scenarios where they must answer legal questions without AI assistance. "AI is forcing us to ask ourselves, 'What are the essentially human skills that we should be training that AI can't replace?'" he said

1

.

Exam Protocols and Gradual AI Integration

All exams in required first-year courses will be administered in-class without access to the internet, electronic files, or apps under the new AI policy

1

. The school is piloting these rules for the upcoming academic year, with plans to review and revise the approach as technology and legal practice evolve.

The strategy to curb AI usage doesn't mean eliminating the technology entirely from legal education. Legal research and writing courses will incorporate AI, but only after students first master writing without it. Students will then learn to use AI for research, revision, and preparations for oral arguments, with both their writing and AI use subject to review

3

.

Upper-Level Courses and AI Lab Offer Advanced Training

While restricting first-year access, the University of Chicago Law School has expanded AI education for advanced students through upper-level courses explicitly focused on AI use and the creation of AI tools for legal work. The school has also launched an AI lab where students learn to develop tools themselves

1

.

Chilton acknowledged that student reactions will likely be mixed, though he noted that individual professors who previously imposed laptop bans received positive feedback from students who felt the restrictions improved their focus. Faculty teaching elective courses will have flexibility to experiment with their own AI policies, though the phone and laptop ban along with in-class exams will remain the default

1

.

Source: Reuters

Source: Reuters

Broader Implications for Legal Education

The move positions Chicago alongside Berkeley Law, which in May introduced rules that drastically limit student AI use, though critics argued Berkeley's policy prohibits too many legitimate applications at a time when legal employers expect new attorneys to demonstrate AI competency

1

. The tension between building foundational skills and preparing students for an AI-enabled legal profession represents a challenge facing law schools nationwide.

The school acknowledged the evolving nature of this challenge, stating: "We recognize that no statement of an AI strategy or vision can be final. Technology is changing too fast. Thus, all the changes we are currently making will be subject to review, reconsideration, and revision as we learn more and as both technology and the practice of law evolve"

2

. This adaptive approach suggests law schools may continue adjusting their policies as they balance the need to promote independent critical thinking with the reality of AI's growing role in the legal profession.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved