Delivery Robots Accused of Scanning Faces Without Consent in Chicago Lawsuits

8 Sources

Share

Two Chicago residents filed class action lawsuits against Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics, alleging delivery robots scanned their faces and hands using AI-powered cameras and lidar systems without consent. The suits claim violations of Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act and raise concerns about data being used for AI training.

Delivery Robots Capture Biometric Data Without Permission

Two Chicago residents have filed class action lawsuits against Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics, alleging that delivery robots scanned their biometric data without consent during food deliveries.

1

The suits, filed in Cook County on October 9, claim the companies violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting facial geometry and hand measurements through AI-powered cameras and lidar systems.

4

Plaintiff Mitchell Breidinger alleged that a Coco robot delivered his DoorDash order in September 2025, even though he hadn't selected robot delivery. While entering a pickup code, the robot's cameras captured his face, head, and hands, while lidar technology measured the geometry of those body parts.

1

Breidinger also claimed a remote operator watched the delivery in real-time, and the company failed to notify him in writing about collecting data without consent or retention schedules.

2

Source: TechRadar

Source: TechRadar

BIPA Violations and AI Training Data Concerns

The second plaintiff, Barry Schain, received three Serve Robotics deliveries through Uber Eats without requesting robot delivery. His lawsuit alleges the company retained video and sensor data, potentially using it for AI training data purposes or licensing it to third parties, including OpenAI.

3

The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act requires companies to provide written notice of data collection types and purposes, obtain prior written consent, and maintain clear retention and deletion schedules.

1

The lawsuits seek statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation or $5,000 per intentional or reckless violation, plus additional unspecified relief.

4

Both cases hinge on whether the robots' scanning of faces and hands constitutes biometric data collection under BIPA, and whether customers were properly informed and consented.

5

Companies Deny Allegations Amid Sidewalk Surveillance Debate

Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics have denied the allegations. A Serve Robotics spokesperson stated that their robots "use cameras and sensors to navigate the sidewalks of Chicago safely" and do not use data to identify individuals or create biometric profiles.

1

Coco Robotics called the lawsuit "frivolous," claiming they collect only navigational data for navigational purposes to make sidewalks safer and do not share data from delivery trip endpoints under data sharing partnerships.

4

However, privacy concerns extend beyond customers. The lawsuits raise questions about whether passersby on sidewalks could also have their faces and hands scanned by the robots, intensifying debates about AI-driven surveillance in public spaces.

5

Chicago has become ground zero for these debates, with residents expressing frustration over sidewalk congestion and safety hazards created by the growing number of delivery robots.

2

Source: Futurism

Source: Futurism

Rapid Industry Growth Raises Privacy and Job Concerns

Coco Robotics now operates approximately 1,000 robots across Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington DC, and Miami, while Serve Robotics has more than 2,000 robots in Los Angeles, Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, Miami, Chicago, and Alexandria, Virginia.

1

Both companies primarily deliver food for DoorDash, Uber Eats, and Grubhub. The US robotic delivery market is projected to grow from $252 million in 2025 to $3.1 billion by 2035.

1

Source: Mashable

Source: Mashable

Privacy experts and digital rights activists warn that autonomous courier technology could be used by governments or corporations to track people's activities, while also eliminating delivery jobs.

1

The backlash mirrors growing resistance to other surveillance tools like Flock Safety cameras across the US, with delivery robots being punched, kicked, tipped over, and defaced according to reports.

1

Chicago's pilot program for these machines expires in May 2027, giving regulators a deadline to weigh benefits against privacy and safety issues.

5

The outcome of these class action lawsuits could establish precedent for how delivery robots collect, store, and share data, particularly as Illinois maintains one of the strongest biometric privacy laws in the United States. Watch for how courts interpret whether lidar systems and camera scanning constitute biometric data collection, and whether the companies' navigational data defense holds up under BIPA's stringent consent requirements.

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved