9 Sources
[1]
Encyclopedia Britannica Wants Perplexity to Stop Using Its Logos When AI Makes Stuff Up
Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines the verb plagiarize as "to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own: use (another's production) without crediting the source." And that's exactly what its parent company, Encyclopedia Britannica, is alleging the AI company Perplexity did
[2]
Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster sue AI search company Perplexity
The AI web search company Perplexity is being hit by another lawsuit alleging copyright and trademark infringement, this time from Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster. Britannica, the centuries-old publisher that owns Merriam-Webster, sued Perplexity in New York federal court on September
[3]
Encyclopedia Britannica sues Perplexity over AI 'answer engine'
Sept 11 (Reuters) - Perplexity AI is the latest artificial intelligence company to be hit with a lawsuit by copyright holders, accused by Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster of misusing their content in its "answer engine" for internet searches. The reference companies alleged, opens new
[4]
Perplexity's definition of copyright gets it sued by the dictionary
Merriam-Webster and its parent company Encyclopedia Britannica are the latest to take on AI in court. The plaintiffs have sued Perplexity, claiming that AI company's "answer engine" product unlawfully copies their copyrighted materials. They are also alleging copyright infringement for instances
[5]
After Anthropic's Billion-Dollar Settlement, Dictionaries Are Suing Perplexity AI
Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster accuse the AI startup of copying their content and attributing hallucinated answers to their brands. Anthropic’s recent $1.5 billion settlement could open the floodgates for more publishers to sue AI companies over how they use copyrighted
[6]
Merriam-Webster and Encyclopedia Britannica sue Perplexity
Add Merriam-Webster and Encyclopedia Britannica to the growing list of companies suing AI company Perplexity for allegedly misusing its content. The companies behind the well-known dictionary and encyclopedia have filed suit in New York federal court, accusing Perplexity of copying their material
[7]
Perplexity hit with a lawsuit by two knowledge titans
They're accusing the AI company of 'cannibalizing' traffic to their websites, impacting revenue. Perplexity is an AI-powered search tool that excels at delivering speedy and relevant answers in a conversational tone. But it's now come up against two long-established giants of knowledge
[8]
Britannica and Merriam-Webster Sue Perplexity AI Over Copyright Claims | PYMNTS.com
By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions. The complaint alleges that Perplexity copied articles from Britannica and
[9]
Britannica Sues Perplexity Over Alleged AI Copyright Breach
This particular lawsuit is quite interesting, as both Britannica and Merriam-Webster create products that mostly contain facts. Copyright law generally does not protect facts but only their particular expression. This fact of the law is something other AI companies, like OpenAI, have relied upon to
Share
Copy Link
Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster have filed a lawsuit against AI search company Perplexity, alleging copyright and trademark infringement. The case highlights growing tensions between traditional publishers and AI-powered search engines.
Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster have filed a lawsuit against AI search company Perplexity, alleging copyright and trademark infringement. The complaint, lodged in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, marks another chapter in the ongoing legal challenges faced by AI companies over their use of copyrighted material
1
2
.
Source: CNET
The lawsuit accuses Perplexity's 'answer engine' of several infractions:
Content Scraping: The plaintiffs allege that Perplexity unlawfully copies their material by scraping their websites
3
.Traffic Diversion: By summarizing articles and providing AI-generated answers, Perplexity is accused of redirecting web traffic away from the publishers' sites, potentially impacting their revenue streams
3
.Trademark Infringement: The complaint highlights instances where Perplexity allegedly attributes AI-hallucinated or incomplete content to Britannica and Merriam-Webster, potentially damaging their reputation
1
.
Source: PYMNTS
This case is part of a larger trend of legal challenges faced by AI companies. Other notable instances include:
1
.2
.4
.
Source: Quartz
Related Stories
The AI industry is grappling with these legal challenges in various ways:
Revenue Sharing: Some companies, including Perplexity, have introduced revenue-sharing programs with media companies
1
.Licensing Deals: Companies like OpenAI and Google have struck licensing agreements with certain publishers to use their content
5
.Legal Precedents: Recent cases, such as Anthropic's $1.5 billion settlement over the use of pirated books, may influence future lawsuits and settlements
5
.As AI technology continues to evolve, the legal landscape surrounding copyright and fair use in the context of AI training and operation remains a contentious and rapidly developing area. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the future of AI-powered search engines and their relationship with traditional content publishers.
Summarized by
Navi
16 Mar 2026•Policy and Regulation

15 Oct 2024•Policy and Regulation

05 Dec 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Science and Research

2
Technology

3
Technology
