2 Sources
[1]
Google's AI Overview still can't spell, and the internet is very aware of it
Google's AI tools remain abysmal at answering questions about spelling, having gone viral two years ago for responding to the question "how many r's are in the word strawberry?" incorrectly. But it's still bad. On Tuesday, X user Naomi Rohatyn tested the large language model's (LLM) current ability to answer to a spelling question. "How many e's in the word astronomical?" they asked. "There are exactly 2 'e's in the word "astronomical" (a-s-t-r-e-n-o-m-i-c-a-e-l)," replied AI Overview. This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. We tried it ourselves, getting the same answer. It appears to work for any word with four or more syllables: Suffice to say, people are having another gleeful round of testing the technology's spelling weakness, sharing their findings on social media. This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. I don't want to be all Billy Madison spelling bee about this, but considering users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results, surely the information provided in AI Overviews should be accurate. But it's complicated. AI chatbots need exact context and specifics to answer as well as they can, so surely spelling words within their training data seems easy. However, things get knotty when you ask an LLM to consider words letter-by-letter, as the model will process text in chunks rather than individual characters (it's called tokenisation). I thought I'd ask Google's Gemini itself, to see what it had to say for itself. Defend your poor spelling! "The short answer is that I don't look at or write text the way you do," Gemini told me. "When you write the word 'apple,' your brain processes five distinct letters. When I read or write text, I see the word as a single unit called a token (a numerical representation of a word or part of a word). "Because I process words as whole blocks of meaning rather than strings of individual letters, I don't naturally 'spell' out words sequentially. I know exactly what 'apple' means and how it relates to other words, but I don't inherently focus on the fact that it contains two 'p's unless specifically asked to break it down." Mashable has reached out to Google for human comment.
[2]
Google's search overhaul has social media users baiting the 'AI Overview' to prove a point
It's been just over a week since Google announced a controversial overhaul of its search engine. Rather than answering queries with a list of links, Google Search's AI Mode now drops users into an interactive AI-powered search box, an expansion to the AI overview features that have been part of Google Search since 2024. From there, users are able to ask follow-up questions within that AI search box, negating the need to access any websites beyond Google Search itself. The news broke the internet as social media lamented that Google was, well, breaking the internet. Users pointed out that Google's AI overviews are still rife with errors, and argued that expanding the search engine's AI integration might only exacerbate those problems. To prove their point, social media is subjecting Google's AI to an internet-wide spelling bee -- one that it's failing spectacularly. For some reason, Google's AI can't seem to keep track of even basic spelling. Take one viral post where a user asked Google how many letter Ls are in the word "google." The AI replied that there are two Ls, then respelled (and misspelled) the word to show where: "Goolle."
Share
Copy Link
Google's AI Overview continues to fail basic spelling tests, two years after initially going viral for the same issue. Social media users are now systematically testing the technology's weaknesses, revealing fundamental problems with how large language models process individual letters through tokenisation. The timing couldn't be worse, as Google just announced a controversial search overhaul expanding AI integration.
Google's AI Overview has sparked another viral moment on social media, demonstrating persistent AI spelling errors that first surfaced two years ago. X user Naomi Rohatyn recently asked the AI-powered search box a simple question: "How many e's in the word astronomical?" The Google AI Overview confidently responded with "There are exactly 2 'e's in the word 'astronomical' (a-s-t-r-e-n-o-m-i-c-a-e-l)," completely missing the correct answer of three
1
. The error appears systematic, affecting any word with four or more syllables, prompting social media users baiting the AI with increasingly creative spelling tests to expose its limitations.
Source: Mashable
The issue extends beyond isolated mistakes. When asked how many letter Ls are in "google," the system claimed there are two Ls, then respelled the word as "Goolle" to demonstrate
2
. These failures mirror the infamous "strawberry" incident from two years ago, when Google Search first went viral for incorrectly counting the letter R in that word. The persistence of these problems raises serious questions about accuracy in AI Overviews, particularly as users are less likely to click on traditional links when an AI summary appears in their results.The root cause lies in how large language models process text. When asked to explain its spelling difficulties, Gemini itself acknowledged the fundamental limitation: "When you write the word 'apple,' your brain processes five distinct letters. When I read or write text, I see the word as a single unit called a token (a numerical representation of a word or part of a word)"
1
. This process, known as tokenisation, allows LLMs to understand meaning and context efficiently but creates a blind spot when tasks require character-by-character analysis.Gemini explained that it processes "words as whole blocks of meaning rather than strings of individual letters," meaning it doesn't naturally focus on individual character counts unless specifically prompted to break down the structure. While this approach enables the AI to grasp complex semantic relationships, it fundamentally undermines its ability to perform tasks humans consider elementary. The technology excels at understanding what "astronomical" means and how it relates to other concepts, but fails to recognize it contains three instances of the letter E.
Related Stories
The timing of these viral spelling failures couldn't be more problematic for Google. Just over a week ago, the company announced Google's search overhaul that dramatically expands AI integration. Rather than presenting users with a traditional list of links, Google Search's AI Mode now drops users into an interactive AI-powered search box, building on AI Overview features that have been part of the search engine since 2024
2
. Users can now ask follow-up questions within that interface, potentially negating the need to access any websites beyond Google Search itself.This expansion has triggered widespread concern across social media and among web publishers. Critics argue that if Google's AI Overview still can't spell basic words correctly, expanding its role in search results could amplify existing problems rather than solve them. The search engine's increased reliance on AI-generated responses means more users will encounter potentially inaccurate information without the opportunity to verify through traditional sources. As one search engine that processes billions of queries daily, the stakes for accuracy are extraordinarily high, yet the technology continues to demonstrate fundamental weaknesses in tasks that seem straightforward to human users. Google has been contacted for comment on the ongoing issues but has not yet provided an official response to the latest wave of criticism on X and other platforms.🟡 untrained_model_only_variables=🟡id: ar-140575
Summarized by
Navi
1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Science and Research
