Google Gemini 3.5 Pro stuck months behind schedule as coding capabilities disappoint

4 Sources

Share

Google's next flagship AI model, Gemini 3.5 Pro, is months behind schedule as coding performance falls short of internal goals. The delay has frustrated engineers and raised concerns about falling behind competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI. Despite updating training data in late June, results remain disappointing.

Google's Flagship AI Model Faces Significant Delays

Google Gemini is experiencing a major setback as the company's next flagship AI model, Gemini 3.5 Pro, remains months behind schedule due to persistent internal development challenges. The delay has sparked frustration among engineers, researchers, and managers who worry about falling behind competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI in the rapidly evolving AI landscape

1

2

.

Google had widely been expected to unveil Gemini 3.5 Pro at its developer conference in May, with CEO Sundar Pichai stating at Google I/O that the model was "showing great improvements" and would arrive the following month

3

4

. That deadline has passed with no release, and the company is still working to bring the model up to its internal standards.

Source: 9to5Google

Source: 9to5Google

Coding Capabilities Fall Short of Goals

Coding performance appears to be the primary obstacle preventing the launch. In late June, Google updated the training data used to develop the model in an attempt to improve its coding capabilities, but the results were disappointing according to sources familiar with the matter

2

3

. This timeline suggests development saw a reset between the May announcement and the missed June launch, adding further delays to an already behind schedule project.

The coding struggles come as both OpenAI and Meta recently released new models that outpace Google's current AI model for writing code, intensifying pressure on teams already struggling to ship

2

. The competitive gap has become a significant concern for Google employees, with some worried that the company is losing ground in a critical area of AI development.

Internal Struggles and Structural Challenges

Google's sheer organizational complexity may be working against it. Multiple teams across Google Cloud, DeepMind, and Android are all building AI coding tools for developers, creating internal competition and fragmentation that has slowed progress

1

2

. Several layers of stakeholders are involved in preparing models for release, adding bureaucratic overhead to an already complex development process.

Resource competition has also emerged as a significant problem. Engineers who try to use AI for their own work often hit capacity constraints due to internal competition for computing power, a problem that extends to external customers as well

2

. Co-founder Sergey Brin has been pushing for the company to move faster on AI coding, but his efforts have been hampered by competing factions and by engineers who believe important code should still be human-written to meet Google's standards

2

.

Google has taken steps to address these structural issues. Chief AI Architect Koray Kavukcuoglu is working to unite the company's internal AI coding tools, and a new team within DeepMind led by research engineer Sebastian Borgeaud has been formed specifically to tackle the coding problem

2

. At its most recent Cloud conference, Google stated that 75 percent of code at the company is now AI-generated and approved by engineers, up from 50 percent last fall

3

.

Market Impact and Customer Response

The delays have had tangible consequences. Alphabet shares slipped more than three percent following news of the setback

2

. The delays have also contributed to a wave of senior departures to Anthropic and other labs, with former employees citing frustration with Google's competitive position as a driving factor

2

.

Customers waiting for the Pro upgrade have had mixed experiences with the current upgraded Flash model. Rodrigo Davies, a product manager at Figma, said the model hit "a sweet spot of speed and quality" for the design platform's AI assistant. However, Freddy Vega, CEO of Latin American education platform Platzi, said the Flash model is more expensive and slower than its predecessor while remaining far less capable than competitors, prompting his team to shift to Anthropic instead

2

.

What Google Says and What's Next

Google pushed back on the notion that it is moving too slowly. A company spokesperson stated that Google is "shipping quickly across a wide range of models while keeping them highly cost-effective for customers"

1

. The company confirmed it is currently testing Gemini 3.5 Pro, an upgraded Flash model, and other models with partners, while engaging productively with the U.S. government on model testing and broader frameworks

4

.

Despite the setbacks with the Pro version, Google has maintained momentum in user adoption. The Gemini app is serving more than 900 million monthly users across 230 countries, with daily queries growing sevenfold

4

. Gemini 3.5 Flash became the default model across the Gemini app and Search's AI Mode following its May launch.

Source: PYMNTS

Source: PYMNTS

The situation highlights the intense pressure facing major AI labs as they race to develop increasingly capable models. For Google, the challenge is not just technical but organizational—finding ways to leverage its vast resources and talent without being slowed by internal complexity. How quickly the company can resolve its coding performance issues and streamline its development process will determine whether it can close the gap with competitors or continue to fall further behind in this critical domain.

Source: Android Authority

Source: Android Authority

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved