Irish Citizens' Jury Calls for AI Healthcare Regulator and National Strategy

Irish Citizens' Jury Proposes AI Healthcare Regulations

A citizens' jury in Ireland, comprising 24 individuals representative of the country's population, has put forward a series of recommendations to promote the "safe, ethical and inclusive use of AI" in the Irish healthcare system. The jury, organized by the Irish Platform for Patient Organisations, Science and Industry (IPPOSI), convened between September and December 2024 to offer public perspective on this complex topic 1

1

2

Key Recommendations

The jury's 25 recommendations include:

1. Establishing an independent statutory regulator for AI in healthcare
2. Creating an independent Commissioner for AI in Healthcare
3. Developing a national strategy for AI in healthcare over the next five years
4. Allocating multi-year funding for quality AI systems in healthcare
5. Providing specific training for medical professionals and students on AI in healthcare

Regulatory Framework

The proposed statutory regulator would be responsible for developing and enforcing standards for AI usage, including licensing, data governance, and monitoring. It would also impose penalties for breaches and publish compliance reports to advance secure, transparent, and accountable AI technologies in healthcare 2

2

The independent Commissioner for AI in Healthcare would serve as a public interest watchdog, protecting patient rights and increasing public awareness about AI use in healthcare. This role would also make recommendations on the use of individuals' health data by AI and identify opportunities to strengthen compliance with regulatory standards 1

1

2

Data Protection and Patient Rights

While supporting automatic enrolment of health data for AI training, the jury emphasized the importance of informed consent and patient rights. They recommended that:

1. Patients should be clearly informed about their data usage
2. An opt-out option should be available
3. Patients should have the right to receive diagnosis or treatment without AI involvement where feasible 1

   1

   2

   2

AI Implementation and Funding

The jury backed the "early, low-risk deployment of high-quality", human-monitored AI tools to help alleviate pressures on the healthcare system, pioneer advances in treatment and care, and empower individuals to take a more active role in their own health 2

2

They also called for:

1. Adequate multi-year funding for quality AI systems in healthcare
2. A task force to develop contingency plans for potential AI failures
3. Additional funding for research in AI healthcare applications 1

   1

Related Stories

UK Watchdog Demands New Laws for AI in Healthcare as Public Support Hinges on Transparency

WHO Europe sounds alarm as AI in healthcare races ahead of governance frameworks across 53 nations

UK Lawmakers Push for Independent AI Watchdog as OpenAI Backs Binding Regulation

International Experts Unveil Recommendations to Combat Bias in AI Health Technologies

Expert and Juror Perspectives

Professor Richard Greene, a member of the independent jury oversight panel and the HSE's chief clinical information officer, welcomed the jury's emphasis on keeping humans at the heart of patient care. He stated, "AI can support us in enhancing decision making and in delivering better outcomes, but it is an aid to healthcare professionals, not a replacement" 1

1

2

Juror Kim Lennard highlighted the need for a strong, independent regulator to ensure responsible and ethical AI use in healthcare. She emphasized that regulation is "just one piece of the puzzle" and called for clear policies and laws to protect patient rights 1

1

2

Next Steps

IPPOSI chairperson Joan Johnston has called for immediate action on developing a national strategy that reflects the priorities set out by the jurors. The recommendations come shortly after Ireland's AI Advisory Council made similar proposals to the government, advocating for independent organizations, specific guidelines, and improved education around AI usage 1

1

As AI continues to evolve and integrate into healthcare systems, these recommendations aim to ensure its responsible and beneficial implementation while safeguarding patient rights and data security.