Match Group survey reveals 47% of singles view AI in dating negatively, but many see benefits

3 Sources

Share

A Match Group survey of 1,000 U.S. singles aged 18 to 39 found that 47% hold negative views about AI in romantic contexts. While two in five singles refuse to date someone who uses AI companion apps like Replika or Kindroid, 64% believe AI tools could help with profile-building and conversation starters. The findings highlight a complex relationship where singles want AI assistance with dating mechanics but reject technology that feels inauthentic.

News article

Singles Express Strong Reservations About AI in Dating

Match Group, the dating app conglomerate behind Tinder, Hinge, and OkCupid, recently released findings from a comprehensive study examining singles' attitudes toward AI in romantic contexts. The Match Group survey, which polled approximately 1,000 U.S. singles aged 18 to 39 between April 13 and May 8, 2026, revealed that 47% hold a negative view of AI in dating scenarios

1

2

. This skepticism comes at a time when dating apps across the industry are rapidly integrating AI features, from Bumble's dating assistant named Bee to Tinder's substantial investment in AI tools that has reportedly slowed its hiring process

1

.

AI Companion Apps Emerge as Major Dating Dealbreaker

The research uncovered particularly strong opposition to AI companion apps, with two in five singles aged 18 to 39 saying they would refuse to date someone using platforms like Kindroid and Replika

2

3

. This dating dealbreaker sentiment intensifies among women aged 18 to 24, where 51% view dating someone using an AI companion as unacceptable

1

3

. Despite this aversion, only 12% of 18- to 24-year-olds reported actually using a companion app over the last three months

1

. Among those who did engage with these apps, the primary motivations were boredom and entertainment at 45%, followed by roleplay and simulation at 43%. Only about a third—38%—said they were seeking genuine connections with chatbots

3

.

Practical AI Tools for Dating Apps Gain Cautious Acceptance

While singles express wariness about AI replacing human connection, the data reveals a more nuanced perspective on AI tools for dating apps. Sixty-four percent of respondents said they could see how AI might help them in their dating journey

1

3

. Specific use cases where singles see value include AI conversation starters, with 26% to 27% expressing interest in using AI to keep conversations going or initiate them

2

3

. Similarly, 27% see potential in AI profile optimization to build stronger profiles, and 24% would consider using AI for date planning

3

. These preferences align with existing industry trends, as Hinge has already introduced Convo Starters to ease messaging pressure, while Tinder offers AI-powered matching based on user interests

2

.

Gen Z Shows Broader AI Adoption Outside Romance

The survey data indicates that Gen Z and younger millennials are far from technology-averse—nearly 75% of singles aged 18 to 39 use AI tools like ChatGPT regularly

2

3

. Sixty-nine percent rely on AI mainly for productivity tasks such as summaries, problem-solving, and content writing

2

. However, when it comes to relationship advice, only 20% turn to AI—just two percentage points below the 22% who consult professional therapists. The vast majority, 60%, prefer seeking guidance from friends and family

2

3

. Relationship therapist Michael Salas tested AI for advice on a complicated friendship situation and received problematic guidance. "It told me this friend clearly didn't care about me. Verbatim, it told me this," Salas explained. "When I told it that, it immediately course-corrected, told me I was right, and shifted to a new framework. That's not wisdom." He recommends using AI for editing and generating ideas, like ways to show someone you care, but cautions against using it as a substitute for humans

2

.

What This Means for Dating App Development

Match Group's findings deliver a clear message to dating app developers: singles want "help with the hard parts, but hands off for the human parts," as the company stated in a blog post

1

. Users will accept AI assistance to refine profiles or navigate conversation lulls, but the actual connection must remain authentically human. This insight carries particular relevance given recent proposals from industry leaders like Bumble founder Whitney Wolfe Herd, who suggested users could have personal bots that date other users' bots—an idea the survey results suggest would face significant user resistance

1

. As Bumble recently faced online backlash after announcing plans to eliminate swiping in favor of a more AI-driven experience, these findings underscore the delicate balance platforms must strike

3

. The data suggests that while AI features may streamline certain aspects of online dating, technology that feels inauthentic or replaces human judgment risks alienating the very users these platforms aim to serve.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved