2 Sources
[1]
This patient's Neuralink brain implant gets a boost from generative AI
"I am so excited to get this in my head," Smith replied, typing out an answer using a device that tracks his eye movement. This was the technology he'd previously used to communicate, albeit slowly. Smith was about to get brain surgery, but Musk's virtual appearance foretold a greater
[2]
Nonverbal Neuralink Patient Is Using Brain Implant and Grok to Generate Replies
The third patient of Elon Musk's brain computer interface company Neuralink is using the billionaire's foul-mouthed AI chatbot Grok to speed up communication. The patient, Bradford Smith, who has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and is nonverbal as a result, is using the chatbot to draft
Share
Copy Link
Bradford Smith, a Neuralink patient with ALS, is using a brain implant and AI tools to communicate, sparking discussions about the intersection of brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence.

Bradford Smith, the third patient to receive Elon Musk's Neuralink brain implant, has made headlines by using the device in conjunction with AI tools to communicate. Smith, who has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and is nonverbal, has been able to type messages and interact on social media platforms using his thoughts
1
.Smith's ability to communicate has been significantly enhanced by the Neuralink implant. He can now control a cursor on his computer screen simply by thinking about it. In a message on X (formerly Twitter), Smith described the experience: "It feels wild, like I'm a cyborg from a sci-fi movie, moving a cursor just by thinking about it"
2
.To further facilitate his communication, Smith has been using Grok, an AI chatbot developed by Musk's company xAI. Smith explained that he provides Grok with notes about his progress, and the AI then drafts full answers to questions. This combination of brain-computer interface and AI technology has allowed Smith to communicate more quickly and efficiently
1
.The use of AI in conjunction with brain-computer interfaces raises important ethical questions. Neuro-ethicists are concerned about the blurring lines between human thought and AI-generated content. Eran Klein, a neurologist at the University of Washington, noted, "There is a trade-off between speed and accuracy. The promise of brain-computer interface is that if you can combine it with AI, it can be much faster"
2
.Smith's newfound abilities extend beyond text-based communication. He has begun creating and editing YouTube videos using his brain-controlled cursor. Additionally, he uses AI voice cloning technology from ElevenLabs to recreate his voice, allowing him to narrate his videos with a synthesized version of his pre-ALS voice
2
.Related Stories
The fact that Smith is using multiple technologies developed by Elon Musk's companies (Neuralink, xAI, and X) has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest and the extent of Musk's influence on Smith's communication. This interconnected ecosystem highlights the complex relationship between users and the technologies they rely on
1
.Smith's case represents a significant step forward in the integration of brain-computer interfaces and AI. It demonstrates the potential for these technologies to restore communication abilities to those with severe neurological conditions. However, it also underscores the need for continued research and ethical considerations as these technologies advance
1
2
.As brain-computer interfaces and AI continue to evolve, cases like Smith's will likely become more common, prompting ongoing discussions about the nature of human-AI interaction and the boundaries of assisted communication.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
01 Apr 2025•Science and Research

16 Jun 2026•Science and Research

23 Aug 2024

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
