Nobel laureate Maria Ressa warns humanity will lose agency without immediate AI regulation

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Issues Urgent Warning on AI Threats

Maria Ressa, the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureate and co-chair of the UN scientific panel on AI, delivered a stark warning about artificial intelligence during a conference on threats to democracy in Oslo. She emphasized that AI regulation must happen immediately or humanity risks losing its agency entirely.1

1

The Filipino and American journalist, recognized for documenting the power of large tech companies, framed the issue as one of public safety rather than freedom of speech. "I think we're at that phase where if this doesn't happen, we will tip ... (It) will be beyond our control if we don't step in now," Ressa stated.2

2

Three Waves of AI Have Already Transformed Society

Ressa outlined three distinct phases of artificial intelligence that have progressively eroded human autonomy. She explained that AI "is neither artificial nor intelligent" and has existed for roughly 70 years, with each wave bringing new challenges.3

3

The first wave involved social media manipulation, where platforms captured attention while polarizing societies and isolating individuals. The second phase focused on biological hacking through chatbots that exploit human needs for intimacy. The third and most concerning wave centers on agentic AI and multi-agentic AI—frontier models creating machines that don't just simulate human behavior but actively act on our behalf, fundamentally threatening human agency.1

1

Dismissing the China Competition Argument

Addressing critics like U.S. President Donald Trump who oppose AI regulation over fears of losing ground to China, Ressa dismissed this reasoning as "good spin." She pointed out that China AI safeguards actually exceed those imposed by Silicon Valley on global users. "China actually puts more safeguards in place for its citizens than Silicon Valley does for the rest of the world. If you're on TikTok, the version of TikTok that is in China has age restrictions," she noted.4

4

This observation challenges the narrative that regulation would disadvantage Western tech companies in the global AI race.

Holding Tech Companies Accountable for Damage Done

Ressa emphasized that the first step toward meaningful change is to hold tech companies accountable for harm already inflicted. She welcomed recent U.S. lawsuits that resulted in Meta paying up to $18 billion over the next decade while imposing strict limits on how teenagers use Facebook and Instagram.5

5

"The very first one (step) is to actually make the companies responsible for the damage they've done," she said.1

1

Her comments came before Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called on AI companies to slow their advancement of model capabilities amid mounting fears of artificial intelligence misuse.

Age Limits Don't Address the Fundamental Flaw

While Ressa welcomed moves by the European Union and Australia to impose age limits on social media, she argued these measures fail to address the core problem: addictive features harm users of all ages. "We know this is harmful, so you should remove the addictive features, not just for teenagers, but for all of us," Ressa stated.2

2

She stressed that political manipulation through these platforms affects entire populations, not just youth, making comprehensive reform essential for protecting democracy worldwide.3

3

Building Public-Interest Communication Platforms as Alternatives

Ressa advocated for creating public-interest communication platforms outside Big Tech control, comparing them to public works like parks. Her news outlet Rappler launched Rappler Communities in 2023 as a model for this approach.4

4

Built on Matrix, an open-source, secure, and decentralized protocol, the mobile app enables the Rappler newsroom to connect with readers while facilitating genuine conversations among community members. Rappler has invited other Filipino media organizations to join and is now extending this model to outlets across Southeast Asia. "It's a place where people can be safe in the digital sphere, where they can talk to each other and more importantly, listen to each other so that the great work of democracy happens," Ressa explained.5

5

This initiative demonstrates how alternatives to Silicon Valley-controlled platforms can prioritize user wellbeing and democratic discourse over engagement metrics and profit.