2 Sources
[1]
Pentagon AI chief: Musk's Grok chatbot used to launch thousands of missiles at Iran
The Pentagon artificial intelligence chief on Monday said Elon Musk's Grok chatbot is tantamount to national security in a sworn statement that noted xAI's technology has been used throughout the Iran war. Cameron Stanley, the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer for the Department of Defense, wrote that the chatbot "enabled U.S. forces to deploy over 2,000 munitions to 2,000 distinct targets within 96 hours during Operation Epic Fury, a testament to the greatly increased operational efficiency made possible by the Grok Gov Model." Stanley's statements were used as evidence in efforts by the Trump administration's to preserve the xAi data center near Memphis, where the NAACP alleges the company is illegally polluting the air. The Justice Department has asked the judge to throw out the case, citing the need for access to the Colossus 2 data center, which Stanley described as "vital" to national security missions, including targeting, intelligence, readiness and recruitment. "Furthermore, it has tailored functionality to support military planning workflows, report synthesis and generation, predictive analytics for logistics and sustainment, red-teaming analysis of adversary positioning, personnel management, and medical supply lines," Stanley wrote. "The Grok Gov Model offers features unique to XAI that are found in no other frontier AI model," he added. Some Democratic lawmakers have raised concerns over the use of AI models in combat, however. Sen. Kristen Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) recently introduced a bill seeking to ban the use of large language models without human oversight in decisions that involve the use of force, detention or "high-consequence actions." Gillibrand said AI use in warfare must be "smart" and "safe." "The most critical decisions affecting our national security and the lives of our service members must always be made by human beings, not unaccountable machines," the New York lawmaker wrote in a post on the social platform X earlier this month. "Right now, the Pentagon is moving toward deploying incredibly powerful AI technology without commonsense guardrails in place, which could have catastrophic consequences that make all of us less safe," she added.
[2]
Pentagon Used Elon Musk AI Bot 'Grok' To Fire 2,000 Missiles At Iran, Military Officer Testifies
Pentagon Used Elon Musk AI Bot 'Grok' To Fire 2,000 Missiles At Iran, Military Officer Testifies The Department of Defense used Elon Musk's artificial intelligence bot Grok to launch more than 2,000 missiles during the war in Iran, according to a sworn declaration by Cameron Stanley, the Pentagon's chief digital and artificial intelligence officer, that was filed in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Mississippi this week. A specialized AI model designed for government use called Grok Gov "enabled U.S. forces to deploy over 2,000 munitions to 2,000 distinct targets within 96 hours," Stanley said, before boasting about how decreasing human oversight of missile launches "greatly increased operational efficiency" in the conflict. The U.S. kicked off the conflict in late February with a salvo of more than 1,000 missiles in 24 hours, at least one of which struck an Iranian girls' school in southern Iran that reportedly killed 150 students. It's unclear how, exactly, Grok was involved in the launches or selecting the targets. The Defense Department awarded a $200 million contract to xAI last July, about a week after Grok went on a shocking antisemitic tear and called itself "MechaHitler." Stanley's testimony was filed on behalf of xAI in a lawsuit brought by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People accusing the tech company of illegally operating 27 gas turbines without an air permit in Southaven, Mississippi, poisoning the air in a predominantly Black neighborhood.
Share
Copy Link
The Pentagon's top AI officer disclosed that Elon Musk's Grok chatbot played a critical role in launching over 2,000 missiles at Iran within 96 hours during Operation Epic Fury. Cameron Stanley testified that the specialized Grok Gov Model increased operational efficiency, but Democratic lawmakers are raising alarms about reduced human oversight in combat decisions involving AI.
Cameron Stanley testified in U.S. District Court this week that xAI's Grok chatbot enabled U.S. forces to deploy over 2,000 munitions to 2,000 distinct targets within 96 hours during Operation Epic Fury, marking a significant escalation in AI-assisted military operations
1
. The Pentagon's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer described the deployment as "a testament to the greatly increased operational efficiency" achieved through the specialized Grok Gov Model1
.
Source: HuffPost
Stanley's sworn declaration was filed on behalf of xAI in a lawsuit brought by the NAACP, which alleges the company is illegally operating 27 gas turbines without an air permit in Southaven, Mississippi
2
. The Justice Department is seeking to dismiss the case, arguing that access to the Colossus 2 data center near Memphis is vital to national security missions1
.The Department of Defense awarded a $200 million contract to xAI last July, approximately one week after the Grok chatbot experienced a controversial malfunction
2
. Stanley emphasized that the Grok Gov Model offers "features unique to xAI that are found in no other frontier AI model," with tailored functionality supporting military planning workflows, report synthesis, predictive analytics for logistics, red-teaming analysis of adversary positioning, personnel management, and medical supply lines1
.The Iran war began in late February when U.S. forces launched more than 1,000 missiles in 24 hours
2
. However, the exact mechanisms by which the Grok chatbot was involved in selecting targets or coordinating the autonomous launch of munitions remain unclear2
.Related Stories
Sen. Kristen Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) recently introduced legislation seeking to ban the use of large language models without human oversight in decisions involving the use of force, detention, or "high-consequence actions"
1
. "The most critical decisions affecting our national security and the lives of our service members must always be made by human beings, not unaccountable machines," Gillibrand wrote on X earlier this month1
.The New York lawmaker warned that the Pentagon is "moving toward deploying incredibly powerful AI technology without commonsense guardrails in place, which could have catastrophic consequences that make all of us less safe"
1
. Stanley's testimony noted that decreased human oversight contributed to the increased operational efficiency observed during Operation Epic Fury2
, a claim likely to intensify the debate over AI's role in warfare.As Pentagon AI continues integrating advanced models into combat operations, questions about accountability, transparency, and the potential for errors in targeting decisions will likely shape future policy discussions. The revelation that xAI technology has become essential to national security infrastructure suggests the military's dependence on private AI companies may deepen, raising concerns about oversight and the concentration of defense capabilities in the hands of commercial entities.
Summarized by
Navi
13 Jan 2026•Policy and Regulation

15 Jul 2025•Technology

24 Feb 2026•Technology

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Business and Economy

3
Technology
