Saber Interactive CEO Apologizes to Writer Replaced by AI, Then Attacks Portal Writer Chet Faliszek

2 Sources

Share

Saber Interactive CEO Matthew Karch apologized to lead writer Stella Sacco after firing her in favor of ChatGPT on Rideshare Stimulator. But the apology was undermined when Karch publicly attacked Portal writer Chet Faliszek, calling him an unsuccessful writer and reigniting the controversy just as it was settling.

Saber Interactive CEO Issues Apology After Weeklong AI Controversy

Saber Interactive CEO Matthew Karch privately apologized to writer Stella Sacco after a weeklong controversy over AI in game development and her termination from Rideshare Stimulator. Sacco shared on Bluesky that Karch "apologized unreservedly for the awful way he spoke about me in the press." While she accepted his apology, noting that "apologies are simply in too short a supply these days to spurn one when it's offered," she emphasized that they remain opposed on their personal stances regarding AI use

1

2

.

How the Rideshare Stimulator Controversy Unfolded

The controversy began when Saber Interactive released a trailer for Rideshare Stimulator, an AI-driven game simulating cab driving. Stella Sacco, the game's former lead writer, publicly claimed she was fired and her workload taken over by an LLM. Saber's official statement admitted to AI use but denied that any writers were replaced wholesale by AI tools. However, Karch supplied his own statement belittling Sacco's competency, stating "I would frankly in retrospect have been happy to replace her with AI"

1

. The Steam page was subsequently updated to include an AI disclaimer revealing that voice overs, music, and non-campaign mission dialogue were AI-generated content

2

.

CEO Escalates Controversy by Attacking Portal Writer

Just as the situation appeared to be resolving, Karch posted a statement on LinkedIn that reignited the controversy. While he reflected on the need to "resolve issues human-to-human" and acknowledged crossing a line, he also attacked Chet Faliszek, the Portal writer who had criticized his handling of the situation. Karch called Faliszek "an unsuccessful writer" and referenced his 26-minute video essay analyzing the controversy. He wrote that when "industry analysis devolves into personal insults and threats, it says far more about the creator than it does about the subject"

1

.

Source: PC Gamer

Source: PC Gamer

Public Backlash and PR Implications for AI in Creative Roles

Faliszek's primary argument was that Karch's original statement was a completely avoidable PR catastrophe that worsened the controversy. Ironically, Karch's own conclusion in the LinkedIn post was that he should have said nothing and left it to the communication team. By providing identifying information about Faliszek's video, Karch effectively expanded the story to "Saber CEO vs. Portal writer" right as things were calming down

1

. This incident highlights the broader ethical implications of AI replacing creative roles and the PR implications when leadership publicly addresses such controversies. Watch for how this affects industry discourse around transparency in AI use and whether other studios will be more cautious about replacing writers with ChatGPT or similar LLMs.

Today's Top Stories

Š 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved