3 Sources
[1]
London mayor putting 'politics over safety' Palantir UK boss says
London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has been accused of "putting politics over public safety" after blocking a £50m contract between the Metropolitan Police and US tech firm Palantir. Scotland Yard had been in talks to use the company's artificial intelligence to speed up criminal investigations. Palantir's UK chief executive Louis Mosley also said the decision would "give hostile states and criminals an advantage". The Met has previously warned it will have to cut officer numbers if the deal does not proceed. Palantir, founded by tech billionaire Peter Thiel, a prominent donor to US President Donald Trump, already holds contracts with other UK public sector bodies. City Hall has raised concerns about value for money. It is also understood Sir Sadiq intends to speak to the government about whether a company's ethics should be taken into account during procurement. Mosley told Times Radio: "Not allowing the Metropolitan Police to have this software will give hostile states and criminals an advantage. It'll mean they cannot put more officers on the front line. "I think the mayor is putting politics over public safety. He talks about values, but I think what Londoners value is not being mugged, not being raped by a serving police officer." The Business Secretary Peter Kyle, speaking on the same programme, said Sir Sadiq needed to "set out the reasons" for his decision. He said: "We need to have more British AI companies that can do those kinds of things, which is why I've taken equity stakes in British AI firms and British tech firms, so that we can scale them up much, much faster." On Thursday, the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) said Palantir was the only supplier the Met had seriously considered for the contract. MOPAC said the force had failed to present its procurement strategy for approval - calling it a "clear and serious breach" of procedure, despite the requirement being "specifically emphasised" to the Met. City Hall was originally told the contract would cost between £15m and £25m per year over two years. Following negotiations, the Met increased the figure to £25m so the total cost would be £50m. MOPAC said it was not satisfied the cost could be met across both years without placing "unacceptable" pressure on other budgets. The Met has argued it needs new technology to remain effective amid staffing cutbacks. The mayor's office has been approached for comment. Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to [email protected]
[2]
Palantir hits back at Sadiq Khan after £50m contract with Met police blocked
London mayor accused of 'putting politics above public safety' for rejecting deal to use AI in intelligence analysis Palantir has accused Sadiq Khan of "putting politics above public safety" after the London mayor blocked its £50m contract with the Metropolitan police in a move that has also led to tensions inside Labour over its involvement with the US tech company. Louis Mosley, who heads Palantir in the UK and Europe, accused Khan of politicising procurement after he rejected a two-year deal for Scotland Yard to use AI to process intelligence in criminal investigations, as first revealed by the Guardian. Mosley said: "What Londoners value is not being mugged, not being raped by a serving police officer." The Met had planned to hire Palantir, which was co-founded by the Trump-supporting tech billionaire Peter Thiel, to automate aspects of investigations. But the mayor's office, which oversees large Scotland Yard contracts, said there had been a "clear and serious breach" of procurement rules. Palantir also works for the Israeli military and the Trump administration in its immigration crackdown. Khan has previously said Londoners only wanted to see public money being paid to companies that "share the values of our city". Last year, when the company's chief executive, Alex Karp, was challenged that "Palantir kills Palestinians" in Gaza, he said: "Mostly terrorists, that's true." Khan's stance puts him at odds with the UK government which has a £330m NHS England deal with Palantir and a £240m deal with the Ministry of Defence. Scotland Yard said Khan's move was "disappointing", adding that without new technology it would have to cut officer numbers which would in turn affect the force's ability to keep London safe. On Friday, Mosley told Times Radio: "What Londoners value is not being mugged, not being raped by a serving police officer and that's really what the focus here should be ... If we are going to politicise procurement in that way then we are going to compromise public safety". His response drew an angry response from the Labour MP Stella Creasy, who said Mosley "should be ashamed of himself". She said: "To hear the CEO of Palantir using the serious matter of sexual abuse by Met officers to attack the mayor of London for rejecting his company and so cutting his profits shows exactly why Palantir are not fit to lecture anyone on values." Mosley also questioned why Khan took exception "with our values and not with other tech companies". "We may work with Israel, but so does Amazon, and so does Microsoft," he said. "We may work with the Trump administration supporting the immigration enforcement arm of his government, so does Amazon, so does Microsoft ... why do we get singled out?" Mosley's response came as Khan's decision appeared to split parts of the Labour party. MPs including Rosena Allin-Khan and Clive Lewis called it the "right call". "Palantir does not reflect the values of our city," said Allin-Khan. "We must maintain public trust and ensure that any tech partnerships truly serve the safety and rights of Londoners." Lewis said: "Other mayors and police and crime commissioners should take note and keep Palantir out of policing." But Peter Kyle, the business secretary, said Palantir could do things "no one else does around the world at the moment, and that's something that I am really taken with". Kyle, who is among Labour ministers who have been lobbied by Palantir, according to records of ministerial meetings, called on the London mayor to "come out and explain" his "big decision". Scotland Yard appointed Palantir initially on a separate deal worth less than £500,000, which meant it did not have to be scrutinised by the mayor. That deal was to use AI to detect rogue officers by scanning to see how they might be abusing rosters and other systems. The body that represents rank and file officers, the Metropolitan Police Federation, described it as a "big brother" system and criticised the "unchecked use of a controversial AI provider to spy on every single one of our colleagues". Met chiefs wanted to extend Palantir's involvement, using it to scan criminal intelligence data for patterns and clues, as it already does for smaller police forces including Bedfordshire and Leicestershire. But City Hall found that the process for extending Palantir's role did not allow bids from other suppliers. Ministers say they are aware of the need for less reliance on foreign AI companies as the technology becomes increasingly applied in the delivery of public services. Kyle said: "We need to have more British AI companies that can do those kinds of things, which is why I've taken equity stakes in British AI firms and British tech firms, so that we can scale them up much, much faster."
[3]
Spotlight - AI, Palantir & the Pushback: Sadiq Khan's much discussed decision over Met Police contract
One of your browser extensions seems to be blocking the video player from loading. To watch this content, you may need to disable it on this site. As AI tools keep raising many concerns about national security and sovereignty, London Mayor Sadiq Khan blocked a fifty million pound contract the Metropolitan Police was supposed to sign with AI giant Palantir. The AI firm would have offered the police force tools to process intelligence in criminal investigations. Susan Hall is the leader of the Conservative Party in the London Assembly, and she discussed this matter with Gavin Lee.
Share
Copy Link
London Mayor Sadiq Khan blocked a £50m contract between the Metropolitan Police and US tech firm Palantir, citing procurement rule breaches and value-for-money concerns. The decision has sparked fierce debate within Labour, with Palantir's UK chief accusing Khan of prioritizing politics over public safety while MPs defend the move as protecting London's values.
Sadiq Khan has blocked a £50m contract between the Metropolitan Police and US tech firm Palantir, triggering a heated public dispute over AI technology for criminal investigations and law enforcement priorities. The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) cited a "clear and serious breach" of breaches in procurement rules, stating that Palantir was the only supplier Scotland Yard had seriously considered for the two-year deal
1
. City Hall was originally told the Met Police contract would cost between £15m and £25m per year over two years, but following negotiations, the Metropolitan Police increased the figure to £25m annually, bringing the total to £50m1
. MOPAC said it was not satisfied the cost could be met without placing "unacceptable" pressure on other budgets, raising concerns about value for money1
.
Source: BBC
Louis Mosley, who heads Palantir in the UK and Europe, launched a sharp rebuke against the London Mayor blocks contract decision, accusing Khan of "putting politics above public safety"
2
. Speaking to Times Radio, Mosley said: "Not allowing the Metropolitan Police to have this software will give hostile states and criminals an advantage. It'll mean they cannot put more officers on the front line"1
. He added: "What Londoners value is not being mugged, not being raped by a serving police officer"2
. The Met had planned to use AI tools from Palantir to automate aspects of intelligence analysis, scanning criminal intelligence data for patterns and clues to speed up investigations2
. Scotland Yard warned it would have to cut officer numbers if the deal does not proceed, potentially affecting the force's ability to keep London safe1
.The decision has exposed tensions within Labour over Palantir's involvement with controversial clients. Khan has previously stated that Londoners only want public money paid to companies that "share the values of our city"
2
. City Hall is understood to be considering whether a company's ethics should factor into procurement decisions1
. Palantir, co-founded by tech billionaire Peter Thiel, a prominent donor to US President Donald Trump, works for the Israeli military and the Trump administration in its immigration crackdown2
. When Palantir CEO Alex Karp was challenged that "Palantir kills Palestinians" in Gaza, he responded: "Mostly terrorists, that's true"2
. Labour MPs including Rosena Allin-Khan and Clive Lewis defended Khan's decision as the "right call," with Allin-Khan stating: "Palantir does not reflect the values of our city"2
. However, Business Secretary Peter Kyle said Palantir could do things "no one else does around the world at the moment," calling on Khan to "come out and explain" his decision2
.
Source: France 24
Related Stories
The controversy highlights broader concerns about national security and reliance on foreign AI companies in delivering public services
3
. Khan's stance puts him at odds with the UK government, which has a £330m NHS England deal with Palantir and a £240m deal with the Ministry of Defence2
. Kyle acknowledged the need for less reliance on foreign suppliers, saying: "We need to have more British AI companies that can do those kinds of things, which is why I've taken equity stakes in British AI firms and British tech firms, so that we can scale them up much, much faster"2
. Scotland Yard initially appointed Palantir on a separate deal worth less than £500,000 to detect rogue officers by scanning rosters and systems, which the Metropolitan Police Federation criticized as a "big brother" system2
. The company already holds contracts with smaller UK police forces including Bedfordshire and Leicestershire2
.Summarized by
Navi
23 Mar 2026•Policy and Regulation

15 Jan 2026•Policy and Regulation

20 Apr 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Science and Research

3
Science and Research
